similar to: [LLVMdev] Enabling debug in LLVM-1.7 release

Hi Am Dienstag, 30. Mai 2006 19:21 schrieb Chris Lattner: > On Tue, 30 May 2006, Silken Tiger wrote: > > Everthing now compiles fine, but when running llc with invoking my own > > backend derived from the cbackend i get the following error: > > namespace llvm { > > class MParSchedule : public BasicBlockPass { > > public: > > > >

Hi > Right it does. However, does something *else* require MParSchedule? If > so, what? Ok, i am writing on a different backend based on the cbackend. The test usage of this pass looks like this: void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const { AU.addRequired<LoopInfo>(); AU.addRequired<MParSchedule>(); AU.setPreservesAll(); } and then in the

On Wed, 31 May 2006, Silken Tiger wrote: >> that requires a BasicBlockPass, it will fail the same was as when a >> ModulePass requires a FunctionPass. > void MParSchedule::getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const { > AU.setPreservesAll(); > } > > MParSchedule requires nothing and changes nothing. So hopefully the above code > represents this fact? Right

Hello, my name is Marc. I wrote a llvm function pass by using the "hello world" tutorial. But this selfwritten pass (GA_VHDL_Pass) dependes on another function pass (GenomePass). GenomePass also dependes on two other function passes. The Pass GenomePass generates an object, which is used in my GA-VHDL_Pass. When I compile my Make file I always get this error message:

Hi all, There's a configuration switch --enable-debug-runtime that sets DEBUG_RUNTIME to 1 (see http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/configure?view=markup) IIUC this variable is meant to control the debug symbols in the runtime libraries, but it is not used anywhere except projects/sample/ I'd like to be able to build compiler-rt with debug symbols, but not all the users will

Hi I have just written an pass which does some simple ASAP scheduling. First i registered it as optimization pass because it so nice documented and speeds up the compilation and testing times dramaticly :-). Then i just registered this part as an analysis part which should be used in a modified cbackend. All seems to work fine, exept that llc fails to link. I tried removing the

Hi, I am trying to install llvm 2.5 in my PowerPC machine. I have already installed XCode Tools 2.4.1. I can compile programs using gcc run them. I try to configure llvm 2.5, the configuration aborts with following message: checking build system type... powerpc-apple-darwin8.11.0 checking host system type... powerpc-apple-darwin8.11.0 checking target system type... powerpc-apple-darwin8.11.0

I've been using the John Fraser's Showdown JavaScript port of Markdown to do real-time previews in-browser. But I also would like to take advantage of some of the extensions in Michel Fortin's PHP Markdown Extra. Has anyone already tried to implement Markdown Extra in JavaScript? Thanks, Keith

Hi Chris and llvm list Thanks for your answer. > So again, this is the problem I described earlier: you have a pass > (MParSchedule) which is a basic block pass. This pass is being required > by another pass (your C backend-based thing) which is not a basic block > pass. This is the problem, please see the "how to write a pass" doc. The > fix is to change

Hi I am currently trying to schedule instructions with my own algorithm. For that i need to get the data dependency between the instructions. So currently i am dooing s.t. like: for(BasicBlock::iterator j=B.begin(),bbe=B.end();j!=bbe;++j) { InstructionList.push_back(j); if (const AllocaInst *AI = dyn_cast<AllocaInst>(j)) {

Hi > One would expect this, its a facility of the C++ language. The anonymous > namespace is, essentially, the same as declaring everything in it > static. That is, the symbols are not exported and not available for > linking. Yes, it was pretty clear after finding out that this isn't a linking error which i suspected... > > So for all those trying to add an analysis path:

On Tue, 30 May 2006, Silken Tiger wrote: > Everthing now compiles fine, but when running llc with invoking my own backend > derived from the cbackend i get the following error: > namespace llvm { > class MParSchedule : public BasicBlockPass { > public: > This pass has been tested as optimization pass with opt, and everything worked > in this

On Fri, 12 May 2006, Silken Tiger wrote: > To find the first instructions which are not depending on others results. So > far it seems to be working but i am missing instructions like: > %tmp.1 = seteq int %argc, 2 ; <bool> [#uses=1] > There seems only an function like llvm::Instruction::mayWriteToMemory > but nothing like llvm::Instruction::mayReadFromMemory or

Hi I have just taken a look at the LLVM-compiler and i am trying to write a pass which analyses the dataflow and sideeffects. So far i have written my own pass which works and i can traverse the blocks, functions and instructions. Currently i am using the "runOnFunction" function and iterate over the functions and blocks. But this seems to be not optimal since the instructions

Hi I am currently investigating the possibility of implementing speex in hardware. So i would be very interested in an integer implementation of speex. The newest changelog entry had somthing about fixes of fixpoint but not much more information. A first glance at the source was not to enlightning so some hints would be really apreciated. Thanks st

I can configure it now. Thank You! --- On Wed, 6/17/09, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote: From: Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Configure problem of llvm2.5 in Mac OS X 10.4.11 To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Date: Wednesday, June 17, 2009, 6:26 PM Hi Murat, This looks suspicious:  

Hi Thanks for all your feedback. I just found the reason for the compile failure for my analysis pass: I had to add my object to the namespace llvm instead of anonymous. This took me some time since i was looking for an linking failure... but as errors go i should have looked at the error message a little closer. So for all those trying to add an analysis path: * add the object name to the

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70208 Priority: medium Bug ID: 70208 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: Nouveau driver doesn't find vbios for Geforce GT 750M on Asus N750JV laptop QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified

On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 1:48 AM Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work at gmail.com> wrote: > > On (06/19/19 01:20), Ilia Mirkin wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 1:08 AM Sergey Senozhatsky > > <sergey.senozhatsky.work at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On (06/14/19 11:50), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > > > dmesg > > > >

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42280 Bug #: 42280 Summary: NVc0 generation card (0x0c1000a1) not working Classification: Unclassified Product: Mesa Version: unspecified Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: