similar to: [LLVMdev] llvm.org is back

Thanks Anton and Chris, it works. On a side note is there a way to have llc preserve function names upon output to C so that external CPP files that link this file in will be able to find the correct functions. And how about name mangling? I assume this is something not taken care of by llc or at least from llvm-g++ to bytecode. Ashwin On 6/2/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote:

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005, Naftali Schwartz wrote: > I'm sorry, it had seemed to me that the documented functionality: > > // ConvertibleToGEP - This function returns true if the specified value V is > // a valid index into a pointer of type Ty. If it is valid, Idx is filled in > // with the values that would be appropriate to make this a getelementptr > // instruction. The type

On Mon, 19 Sep 2005, Brian R. Gaeke wrote: > Sorry, I don't personally have any of that stuff anymore -- I seem > to recall that page didn't have a whole lot on it, though. I think > Misha has messed around with llvm-tv more recently than I have. If > you really want that particular page, it looks like you can get (a > version of) it from the Internet Archive... > >

Well, I guess I was hoping soemthing like this would help in the pointer-to-array transformation for the following code: > > int A[100], B[100], C[100], X, Y, Z; > > > > int *p_a = &A[0]; > > int *p_b = &B[0]; > > int *p_c = &C[0]; > > > > int i, j, k, f; > > for ( k = 0; k < Z; k++ ) > >

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005, Naftali Schwartz wrote: > But it's completely empty, no? > > const Type *llvm::ConvertibleToGEP(const Type *Ty, Value *OffsetVal, > std::vector<Value*> &Indices, > const TargetData &TD, > BasicBlock::iterator *BI) { > return 0; > }

misspellings: What's new, 1st paragraph: "nightly tester <http://llvm.org/nightlytest/>, llvm-config enhancEments"; 've found nothing wrong except of it :) On 8/8/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > > > Hi All, > > Here's the first draft of the LLVM 1.8 release notes. Please take a look > and send me any comments or feedback you

On Sun, 9 Nov 2003, Rahul Joshi wrote: > Coming back to the issues that I had integrating LLVM with > MSSP, will the code in include/Support also be put in the > llvm namespace? That will solve many problems and help prevent > others. Absolutely. -Chris > ---- Original message ---- > >Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 10:13:03 -0600 (CST) > >From: Chris Lattner <sabre at

Didn't SparcV9 backend implement list scheduling? 2005/12/16, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org>: > On Thu, 15 Dec 2005, thean kiat sew wrote: > > I am planning to use list scheduling on LLVM instructions. > > Any recommendation on how to start ? As in which codes in LLVM that I need > > to look at. > > We don't currently have a list scheduler in the

On Wed, 7 Nov 2007, Bill Wendling wrote: > On 11/7/07, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: >> No, it wouldn't be terrible. This sounds like a good short-term fix. >> > My patch as the short-term fix? :-) Just force the alignment of llvm.memcpy and friends to 1 in all cases. -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/

On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Jeff Cohen wrote: > It will have to be Morten. I can't get ltdl.c to compile. But wasn't > the whole point of doing platform-specific DynamicLibrary.cpps to get > rid of ltdl.c? ltdl.c is part of libtool that is supposed to BE the cross-platform dynamic linker interface. However, for platforms it doesn't really support, using custom code makes perfect

On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Daniel Berlin wrote: > This certainly doesn't occur in gcc mainline. > In fact, I improved the error message, and added a error test to gcc > just yesterday. Yep, clang reports: t.c:4:12: error: read-only variable is not assignable arr[0] = 1; ~~~~~~ ^ 1 diagnostic generated. so this is specific to llvm-gcc somehow. -Chris > On 8/9/07, Chris

This was the default version I got from public cvs last week. On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 03:44:19 -0600 (CST), Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Valery Khamenya wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > maybe it is of interest for someone: > > I successfully compiled llvm and gcc front-end sources at Gentoo Linux > > (even on exotic

El 26/06/2007, a las 20:05, Chris Lattner escribió: > On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, [ISO-8859-1] Alberto González wrote: >> I'm using LLVM to instrument C code to test the efectiveness of some >> methods of error detection with dynamic invariants (see http:// >> citeseer.ist.psu.edu/hangal02tracking.html). I'm using also a range >> invariant (max an min values seen). The

I'm sorry, it had seemed to me that the documented functionality: // ConvertibleToGEP - This function returns true if the specified value V is // a valid index into a pointer of type Ty. If it is valid, Idx is filled in // with the values that would be appropriate to make this a getelementptr // instruction. The type returned is the root type that the GEP would point to would be quite

I commented this line and it is compiling now: extern void *malloc ARGS((unsigned)); I hope that will not cause a different kind of problem. What it is zalloc used for? Thanks --- Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Sat, 12 Mar 2005, xavier wrote: > > > It seems that this happened before but I do not know the details: > >

Yes, sorry for not mentioning it. I added that header also Although I suppose that if I am not using Sparc there will be no problem (it's an Itanium 2 machine) Thanks --- Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Sat, 12 Mar 2005, xavier wrote: > > > I commented this line and it is compiling now: > > > > extern void *malloc ARGS((unsigned)); > >

On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, [ISO-8859-1] Alberto González wrote: > I'm using LLVM to instrument C code to test the efectiveness of some > methods of error detection with dynamic invariants (see http:// > citeseer.ist.psu.edu/hangal02tracking.html). I'm using also a range > invariant (max an min values seen). The problem is that for those > invariants, I need to know if the value is

On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Jingling Xue wrote: > I understand that LLVM is now available in the public domain. Yes it is. It can be downloaded from the LLVM releases page here: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/releases/ > I need to decide which compiler system I will use for my advanced > compiler course this year. The current release is 1.1. We are tentatively planning to release 1.2 sometime in

Coming back to the issues that I had integrating LLVM with MSSP, will the code in include/Support also be put in the llvm namespace? That will solve many problems and help prevent others. Rahul ---- Original message ---- >Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 10:13:03 -0600 (CST) >From: Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> >Subject: [LLVMdev] LLVM namespac'ification >To: LLVMdev List

> > Message: 3 > Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:42:50 -0700 (PDT) > From: Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Partial evaluation and LLVM > To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0706121039530.30413 at nondot.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > On Tue,