similar to: [LLVMdev] LLVM build error

It looks to me like your libLLVMSupport.a didn't get built or you didn't update all of LLVM. Please make sure you update from the root of the tree with the command: cvs update -ARPd Reid. On Sat, 2006-06-24 at 13:16 +0100, Lexington Luthor wrote: > Hi, > > While attempting to build the LLVM code from CVS today using gcc 4.1, I > encountered the following error. Any idea

Now that we have a "-why" option to the GenLibDeps.pl utility (which is used by llvm-config to deduce library dependencies), a review of the output has led to a few dubious library dependencies. Here they are: All of the following dependencies are singletons (the dependent library depends on only a single symbol from the dependency library): libLLVMCodeGen.a:

Hello Anton Thu, 3 Aug 2006 15:06:56 +0400 you wrote: > here it is in the attachment :) Ok. Could you also send LibDeps.txt file? It should be in /obj/tools/llvm-config directory -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov. Faculty of Mathematics & Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University.

The recent change in the library structure to make libLLVMCore.a instead of LLVMCore.o has caused a little fallout. The problem is LLVM tools that take a --load option to load a module dynamically may now cause those modules to fail to load at runtime. This occurs because the tool with the --load option might not be linking in all of libLLVMCore.a, but only the object modules actually needed by

Hello Anton Fri, 4 Aug 2006 21:45:19 +0400 you wrote: > Written by Mike Haertel and Paul Eggert. > I've updated llvm and llvm-gcc4 ant trying to build it again after > PR845 was resolved. According to Reid's letter this PR coud be the > reason of my problem. Anyway, "sort" call can cause large problems depending, where in your PATH cygwin directory is (before

Has anything been done about this issue since Reid first mentioned it? I think I'm getting bitten by it. -- John T. Reid Spencer wrote: > The recent change in the library structure to make libLLVMCore.a instead > of LLVMCore.o has caused a little fallout. The problem is LLVM tools > that take a --load option to load a module dynamically may now cause > those modules to fail to

There are some bugs against it that state the current progress. The problem is that it depends on how the libraries are being used. Even if you get past the linking problems, you will end up with re-registration of passes and options, etc., which causes asserts. So, for now, there aren't many good solutions. Reid. On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 17:21 -0500, John Criswell wrote: > Has anything

> > If you're building llvm-gcc4, you don't need the runtime libraries, so > I'd just stick with the "tools-only" build and declare success. If > you're building llvm-gcc3, I'd suggest you switch to llvm-gcc4 :) I switched to llvm-gcc4 but when I run make from obj folder i run into folowing errors: Can't find a library with no dependencies at

Hello Anton Thu, 3 Aug 2006 12:38:54 +0400 you wrote: > I've updated it yesterday and rebuilt - llvm built fine. But when > building llvm-gcc4 (also updated yesterday from new /trunk > directory) it fails with the same error. You might easily get llvm-gcc4-mingw32 binaries from "prerelease" directory. Since stdcall, fastcall & dllimport stuff is unsupported right now,

Hi, in trying to build an llvm-gfortran on linux from today's gcc4 SVN, I get the following link errors that didn't show up on OS X. This is also using LLVM CVS from this morning. They appear to mostly be related to CodeWarrior compatibility code, but a couple are less obvious. What's the best way to fix this? I'm stuck without my powerbook for at least three weeks and I'd

Hi, I recently switched to LLVM-GCC 4.2 on OS X, to go around a bug caused by gcc with optimized code. Unfortunately, I ran into another weird problem on LLVM-GCC. In my code, there's a file with a bunch of inline assembly blocks, that worked fine with GCC 4.2. Now, when compiling with LLVM-GCC 4.2, weird things happen. Here's an example: (the blocks are larger than that, but a single

This is release_50 branch of git, sha1: f1d5723be3f9456a6b16cdf687847ac2918846de Using gcc 7.2.0 from homebrew. $ CC=/usr/local/opt/gcc/bin/x86_64-apple-darwin16.7.0-gcc-7 CXX=/usr/local/opt/gcc/bin/x86_64-apple-darwin16.7.0-g++-7 cmake .. -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/Users/andy/local/llvm5 -DCMAKE_PREFIX_PATH=/Users/andy/local/llvm5 $ make VERBOSE=1 [ 92%] Linking CXX

You may find it helpful to reference http://www.ibiblio.org/gferg/ldp/GCC-Inline-Assembly-HOWTO.html. In particular, the information regarding clobbers and constraints. Generally speaking, it's best not to use inline assembly at all. What are you trying to do that you find it necessary? On Mar 16, 2010, at 12:30 AM, Fred / Kettch wrote: > Hi, > > I recently switched to LLVM-GCC

I''ve read the docs. Honestly. But, I still can''t get my site working with the latest gem. I''m confused over when and how I need to specify content blocks, and how these relate to the stuff in config.yaml. The specific problem is with my analytics file include, I get errors like this: An error has occurred: Error while processing </analytics.en.html>: Error

Hi, I' am trying to insert an InlineAsm Instruction in my pass, which FunctionType do I need for Inlineasm? If I understand it right, I need a call instruction to insert the new produced InlineAsm? Thanks for help, Michael for (BasicBlock::iterator bi = i->begin(), be = i->end(); bi != be; ++bi){ std::vector<const Type*> asm_arguments;

On Jul 31, 2009, at 10:24 AM, Michael Graumann wrote: > Hi, > I’ am trying to insert an InlineAsm Instruction in my pass, which > FunctionType do I need for Inlineasm? > If I understand it right, I need a call instruction to insert the > new produced InlineAsm? > > Thanks for help Inline asm works like a "callee". So for: call void asm sideeffect

Hi all, I'm trying to figure out which parameters of a given InlineAsm instruction are its inputs, and which are the outputs (rationale: make sure MSan doesn't check the output parameters of an asm() statement). As far as I understand, this information is only available through the ConstraintInfoVector for the InlineAsm. However there's no exact match between the constraints and the

(Sorry, previous post got sent by accident. This is the real one) Folks, Here's some timing results looking at LLVM when it uses libLLVMCore.o vs. libLLVMCore.a. We're trying to decide which way to go and thought some data would help. The net of it is that using libLLVMCore.a is cheaper in both time and size of executables. We save 37 seconds on linking LLVMCore and about 1 minute 30

Thank you Chris, for your hint, but I am still too stupid. I tried two versions asm_arguments.push_back(Type::VoidTy); FunctionType *asm_type = FunctionType::get(Type::VoidTy, asm_arguments, false); Alternatively FunctionType *asm_type = FunctionType::get(Type::VoidTy, std::vector<const Type*>(), false); . Can you give me a snippet of example code, or somebody else?

Hi, Recent trunk has a lot of failures on PPC64/Linux. One seems to be crash with a backtrace like: [ 3149s] -- [ 3149s] 0 libLLVMSupport.so 0x00003fff7ed0b864 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(_IO_FILE*) + 4294746876 [ 3149s] 1 libLLVMSupport.so 0x00003fff7ed0bb1c [ 3149s] 2 libLLVMSupport.so 0x00003fff7ed0c520 [ 3149s] 3 linux-vdso64.so.1 0x00003fff7f7b0478 __kernel_sigtramp_rt64 + 0 [ 3149s] 4