similar to: [LLVMdev] Re: single exit BB

Hello. I'm new to LLVM, so I apologize if this is a basic question. I've used llvm-gcc to produce an LLVM assembly file (-S) as well as the bytecode file. I then used 'analyze -print-cfg' on the bytecode and realized that some optimizations have been applied against the corresponding assembly file. If I understand the operations, the emitted assembly file has no optimizations,

First, thanks to those who have responded to my earlier pleas for help. You have either directly or indirectly helped me find the answers I needed. I'm slowly getting up to speed with LLVM. Now I have 2 more questions. 1) I'm using LLVM 1.8a with llvm-gcc3. I'm trying to compile firefox (with regular gcc and make) while using LLVM to automatically instrument one source file

Jerry Hom wrote: I haven't seen anyone answer this question yet, so I'll take a crack at it: > First, thanks to those who have responded to my earlier pleas for > help. You have either directly or indirectly helped me find the > answers I needed. I'm slowly getting up to speed with LLVM. Now I > have 2 more questions. > > 1) I'm using LLVM 1.8a with

I'm running into an error message about PHINode which I don't understand too well. Hopefully I can explain this clearly. At a high level, I'm just trying to add a fprintf() statement at the end of functions to show me a timestamp. However, I also add an if/then such that I can turn the printing on/off. When using llvm-gcc, I've disabled linker and assembler optimizations in

Hi, This is the first time I've posted, and I apologize if I formulate this incorrectly. I am analyzing data from a multi-region carrot variety trial. 35 varieties of carrots were grown in 3 randomized complete blocks in organic and conventional fields in Wisconsin, Indiana, Washington, and California. In this example I am comparing the heights of the carrot tops at harvest. In other

This question is similar to Ryan Lefever's post on May 1, 2006 about printf declaration. In my case, I want to insert fprintf(stderr, ...) calls. I'm new to LLVM, and I don't know what's the recipe for putting together the arguments. Can someone give me basic instructions or point me in the direction on what to do? I can't find any more documentation on this. Thanks!

For the following code is there a way to make the jitter all line up horizontally, instead of them being just randomly spread around a value. So for ex if there are multiple values at 63 for genotype wt then all the values should be plotted on the same y value of 63 but spaced apart by a certain factor or noise.. library(lattice); dataFrame <- as.data.frame(t(structure(c( 64,'wt',

Thanks Bert for all the help. I got the legend figured out Friday but left early becoz of long weekend so didn't get a chance to reply.. I modified the plot margins a little bit and Here's what I finally had... par(mar=c(c(10, 6, 6, 10) + 0.1)); par(xpd=FALSE); with (dataFrame, stripchart(marbles_buried ~ genotype, method="jitter", vertical=TRUE, col = c('blue',

-----Original Message----- From: Ghosh, Sandeep Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 5:43 PM To: 'Berton Gunter' Subject: plot legend outside the grid Thanks for the pointers... I managed to get everything to look and feel the way I want except for the legend to plot outside the grid... Thanks for the note on the par, but I'm not able to it to plot outside the plot grid.. dataFrame <-

Hello, I am working on the SimpleITK package for R. This is an enormous package that is largely automatically generated via a set of swig/json/lua magic, and is working well under linux and osx. However we're having a lot of trouble with the Windows side. In fact, we are struggling to get the base libraries to build using the RTools 3.4 toolchain, even before the worrying about the R-specific

> I'll be happy to answer any further questions you may have, feel free to e-mail > me directly (though right now our mail server is down) > The salient features that we want to have in the driver are: 1. llvm-ld will be used as "The Optimizer". 2. If the user has specified to generate the final executable, then llvm-ld should run on all the .bc files generated by clang

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Long Fei wrote: > > This didn't work as I tried with 197.parser. it works without > "-Wl,-disable-opt" switch though. > > [197.parser]$ llvm-gcc analyze-linkage.c and.c build-disjuncts.c > extract-links.c fast-match.c idiom.c main.c massage.c parse.c post-process.c > print.c prune.c read-dict.c utilities.c xalloc.c word-file.c

Am 31.05.2017 um 16:35 schrieb Timo Sirainen: > On 31 May 2017, at 16.53, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net > <mailto:h.reindl at thelounge.net>> wrote: >> >> LTO build is as broken as 2.2.30 >> >> libtool: link: ( cd ".libs" && rm -f "lib10_quota_plugin.la" && ln -s >> "../lib10_quota_plugin.la"

Hi all. Any reason not to turn these on if the system supports them? They're cheap but not free (a bit under 1% slower to run the complete regress suite in a completely unscientific test). They're based on info from these places: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ToolChain/CompilerFlags http://wiki.debian.org/Hardening http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/hardened/gnu-stack.xml and I've attempted to

This didn't work as I tried with 197.parser. it works without "-Wl,-disable-opt" switch though. [197.parser]$ llvm-gcc analyze-linkage.c and.c build-disjuncts.c extract-links.c fast-match.c idiom.c main.c massage.c parse.c post-process.c print.c prune.c read-dict.c utilities.c xalloc.c word-file.c strncasecmp.c -Wa,-disable-opt -Wl,-disable-opt -lm -o llvm_parser [197.parser]$

Hi, All, Thanks for your answer ahead of time. I plug in an new pass into LLVM to insert one line of code to each BB for printing current BB number. I insert this pass in the Instrumentation phase. But after code generation, I found the total number of BB is different with the number shown in Assembly code. For example, when I traverse all BBs during the instrumentation phase, there are 30000.

Anyone see any reason not to add these extra compiler/linker flags if they're supported? Index: aclocal.m4 =================================================================== RCS file: /home/dtucker/openssh/cvs/openssh/aclocal.m4,v retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -p -r1.8 aclocal.m4 --- aclocal.m4 20 May 2011 01:45:25 -0000 1.8 +++ aclocal.m4 17 Dec 2012 03:56:32 -0000 @@ -21,6 +21,23 @@

Hi Sanjiv, Sanjiv Gupta <sanjiv.gupta <at> microchip.com> writes: > The salient features that we want to have in the driver are: > [...] As promised, I've implemented a basic compiler driver for the PIC16 toolchain. It's under tools/llvmc/examples/mcc16. Some examples illustrating the features you requested: > 2. If the user has specified to generate the final

Hi, I was installing hundreds of packages on a machine with a single call to install.packages() and after a long time the call to install.packages() finally returned with the following warnings and errors: Warning messages: 1: packages ?hgu133aprobe?, ?hgu95av2.db?, ?BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2?, ?BSgenome.Mmusculus.UCSC.mm10?, ?BSgenome.Dmelanogaster.UCSC.dm3.masked?,

Long Fei wrote: > > I am investigating some inlining issue, so I did > > llvm-gcc aaa.c bbb.c ... nnn.c -o output > opt -inline -inline-threshold=xxx < output.bc | llc -march=c > > output_inline.c I am unsure of whether the LLVM GCC frontend does any inlining. However, I do know that your methods above run the LLVM inlining pass, albeit indirectly. If you use