similar to: [LLVMdev] new llvmgcc4 snapshop

On Sat, 2006-05-20 at 19:22 -0500, Chris Lattner wrote: > This should build with mainline, includes some performance tweaks, better > build support for mingw, detects a faulty --enable-llvm configure > option, and has better support for the Darwin/X86 ABI: Any functional changes for non-Darwin or am I ok continuing to use the last snapshop? Andrew

Hi All, There's a new snapshot of llvmgcc4 available here: http://nondot.org/sabre/2006-05-08-llvm-gcc-4.tar.gz This release includes the various portability fixes contributed on llvmdev, includes fixes to build with mainline CVS (and, thus, *requires* mainline CVS), and includes various other bug fixes. If you're interested, please try it out. Thanks, -Chris --

Chris Lattner wrote: > > Hi All, > > There's a new snapshot of llvmgcc4 available here: > > http://nondot.org/sabre/2006-05-08-llvm-gcc-4.tar.gz > > This release includes the various portability fixes contributed on > llvmdev, includes fixes to build with mainline CVS (and, thus, *requires* > mainline CVS), and includes various other bug fixes. > > If

Chris Lattner wrote: > > Hi All, > > There's a new snapshot of llvmgcc4 available here: > > http://nondot.org/sabre/2006-05-08-llvm-gcc-4.tar.gz Chris, is there any chance that the new frontend will support dynamic loading of backends? I.e: llvm-g++ -load my_backend.so -march=my_arch a.c ? Thanks, Volodya

On Sat, 13 May 2006, Vladimir Prus wrote: >> If you're interested, please try it out. > I get this with LLVM CVS: > Adding: > #include "llvm/Target/TargetData.h" > Fixed this. Right, thanks. > Chris, any change you'll make gcc4 frontend source available from some CVS? > Then, I can put together a script to build it every night, to make sure > things

Hi, I ran into a problem when running DSA on Linux kernel (the Kernel version I used is 2.4.31). The analysis was aborted when it tried to do DSNode::mergeTypeInfo on some data structure in the kernel. I have filed a bug report at http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1656. My question is what version of Linux kernel LLVM has been tested on successfully? To run DSA analysis, should I use the

On 9/13/07, Haifeng He <hehaifeng2nd at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I ran into a problem when running DSA on Linux kernel (the Kernel > version I used is > 2.4.31). The analysis was aborted when it tried to do > DSNode::mergeTypeInfo on some data structure in the kernel. I have > filed a bug report at http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1656. It is possible there was a

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Oct 25, 2011, at 9:29 AM, David A. Greene wrote: > >> Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> writes: >> >>> I'm removing old targets that no longer appear actively maintained, >>> to reduce the burden for target-independent codegen maintenance. >>>

On Monday 22 May 2006 22:22, Andrew Lenharth wrote: > On Mon, 2006-05-22 at 15:33 +0800, 澶忎竴姘� wrote: > > But my code does not always works: if the arguments are not pointer, > > CompleteBUDataStructures not records it. So, if you want to find all indirect > > calls, you maybe have to repair CompleteBUDataStructures. :) > > Not surprising, CBU is trying to do something

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Sat, 13 May 2006, Vladimir Prus wrote: >>> If you're interested, please try it out. >> I get this with LLVM CVS: >> Adding: >> #include "llvm/Target/TargetData.h" >> Fixed this. > > Right, thanks. > >> Chris, any change you'll make gcc4 frontend source available from some >> CVS? Then, I can

Hi, i tried compiling llvmgcc4 on x86_64-linux. The two changes i needed to apply to llvm and llvmgcc4 are attached. Those two patches tell llvmgcc4 to use the x86 code-generator for x86_64 and give x86_64-* targets a score of 10 for the x86 backend when trying to find appropriate backends. Now i'm getting stuck during the compile when an assertion is triggered: make[3]: Leaving

Thanks for the info. My impression is that __sync_synchronize takes no arguments and is the memory barrier, i.e., "llvm.memory.barrier(i1 true,i1 true,i1 true,i1 true,i1 true)". Is that right? I would like a little finer control to express just a write barrier (st-st) or a read barrier. -- Mon Ping On Sep 17, 2008, at 5:50 AM, Andrew Lenharth wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16,

On Oct 25, 2011, at 9:29 AM, David A. Greene wrote: > Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> writes: > >> I'm removing old targets that no longer appear actively maintained, >> to reduce the burden for target-independent codegen maintenance. >> >> Does anyone object to the removal of the Alpha backend? > > It would be a shame to lose it. Alpha is an

Hi Everyone, Here are my notes on the LLVM 1.7 release, which will go into the final release announcement. As Tanya mentioned, it has been far too long since the last release, and there have been a lot of CVS commits since Novemeber. :) I went through them all and pulled out some of the major improvements, which I've listed below. I'm certain that I have forgotten some things, so

On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 13:32 +0800, Nai Xia wrote: > On Monday 22 May 2006 22:22, Andrew Lenharth wrote: > > On Mon, 2006-05-22 at 15:33 +0800, 澶忎竴姘� wrote: > > > But my code does not always works: if the arguments are not pointer, > > > CompleteBUDataStructures not records it. So, if you want to find all indirect > > > calls, you maybe have to repair

The gcc4 tree is in svn. We believe it should be straight forward to create a public svn image but it will be late next week before we can set it up (minimal svn experience between Chris and myself.) Cheers, -- Jim On May 15, 2006, at 3:12 AM, Vladimir Prus wrote: > Chris Lattner wrote: > >> On Sat, 13 May 2006, Vladimir Prus wrote: >>>> If you're

Dear list, we have a relatively new Sun Storage 7310, where we connect CentOS 5.5 Servers (IBM LS21/LS41 Blades) via Brocade Switches, 4GBit FC. The Blades boot from SAN via qla2xxx, and have no harddisks at all. We want them to use multipathing from the very beginning, so /boot and / are already seen by multipathd. Problem is, that the Sun 7310 has two storage heads which run in

Hi, My storage admin just assigned a Lun (fibre) to my server. Then re scanned using echo "1" > /sys/class/fc_host/host5/issue_lip echo "1" > /sys/class/fc_host/host6/issue_lip I can see the scsi device using dmesg But mpath device are not created for this LUN Pleas see below. The last 4 should be active and I think this is the problem Kernel:

>> Sorry for the delay, please try this tarball: >> http://nondot.org/sabre/2006-03-02-llvm-gcc-4.tar.gz > > There's some confusion with --enable-llvm configure parameter. I've built > LLVM to a separate build dir. The source is ~ghost/Work/llvm-cvs and build > dir is /space/p2/ghost/build/llvm-cvs ... > So, it seems like, at the same time: > > 1. buildir

I am trying to implement an ANOVA on a pair of quantile regression models in R. The anova.rq() function performs a basic check to see whether the models are nested, but I think this check is failing in my case. I think my models are nested despite the anova.rqlist() function saying otherwise. Here is an example where the GLM ANOVA regards the models as nested, but the quantile regression ANOVA