similar to: [LLVMdev] successfully bootstraped on a i686-linux-gnu

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] successfully bootstraped on a i686-linux-gnu"

2006 Apr 28
0
[LLVMdev] successfully bootstraped on a i686-linux-gnu
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, [UTF-8] Rafael Esp?ndola wrote: > To work aroud the problem I edited gcc/objc/config-lang.in and removed > the comment from the line > #target_libs=target-libobjc > > With this change it is again possible to build without objc. The > complete configure line was > > ../llvm-gcc4-1.7.source/configure --prefix=$CFEINSTALL > --enable-languages=c,c++
2006 May 01
1
[LLVMdev] successfully bootstraped on a i686-linux-gnu
Hi, I recently bootstrapped gcc4 frontend on a i686-linux-gnu too. As I notice, if the llvm "tools-only " was build with srcdir != objdir , the building of llvm-gcc4-1.7.source encountered mistakes of unable to find some header files. So I just edited llvm-gcc4-1.7.source/gcc/Makefile.in and a line like this: INCLUDES += -I$(LLVMOBJDIR)/include With this change, the building errors
2005 May 19
2
[LLVMdev] Building LLVM cfrontend
Hi, I am still new to LLVM and also GNU softwares. I am doing a project using LLVM. I was building cfrontend on my windows cygwin, however I encountered this problem, may I now what is the cause? ******************************** my configuration output is: bash-2.05b$ ../src/configure --prefix=$CFEINSTALL --disable-threads --disable-n ls --disable-shared --enable-languages=c,c++ loading
2006 Apr 20
2
[LLVMdev] trying to bootstrap gcc 4.0.1 and the cvs llvm
I am trying to bootstrap the just released gcc 4.0.1 and the cvs head llvm. I was able to build the llvm tools without a problem. gcc has a small problem (from the apple branch IIRC): libojc is built unconditionally, so objc must be in the --enable-languages option for the build to be successful. Building the rest of llvm fails with llvm[3]: Compiling crtend.ll to crtend.bc for Debug build
2005 May 19
0
[LLVMdev] Building LLVM cfrontend
The very first time you build GCC, you should do "make bootstrap". After that, you can use "make" and "make install" Reid. On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 00:15 +0800, thean kiat sew wrote: > Hi, I am still new to LLVM and also GNU softwares. > > I am doing a project using LLVM. > > I was building cfrontend on my windows cygwin, however I encountered >
2004 Dec 22
3
[LLVMdev] README: Build Environment Changes
LLVMers, If you're not working from the CVS "head", you can ignore this. Otherwise, please read it! I have committed changes to CVS head that require changes to your build environment. This is part of PR432. The changes involve getting the CFE to build an executable named llvm-gcc instead of gcc. The hyphenated name was chosen to be consistent with other LLVM tools, it is also
2010 Apr 26
3
[LLVMdev] r102300 breaks Obj-C codegen on Darwin x86
After commit 102300, any obj-c software compiled with clang crashes at launch time with the following stack trace. Reverting this specific commit fix the issue. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Date/Time: 2010-04-26 10:07:01.630 +0200 OS Version: Mac OS X 10.6.3 (10D573) Report Version: 6 Interval Since Last Report:
2010 Apr 26
0
[LLVMdev] r102300 breaks Obj-C codegen on Darwin x86
I managed to build a reduced test case: ================== foo.m ================== #include <Foundation/Foundation.h> @interface BaseNode : NSObject <NSCoding, NSCopying> { } @end @implementation BaseNode @end int main(int argc, char **argv) { return 0; } ========================================== # clang -o foo -arch i386 -framework Foundation foo.m foo.m:8:1: warning:
2006 Oct 10
1
[LLVMdev] gccas problem with crtend.ll again
> On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, [UTF-8] Rafael Esp?ndola wrote: > > > I am trying to bootstrap the just released gcc 4.0.1 and the cvs head llvm. > > > > I was able to build the llvm tools without a problem. > > gcc has a small problem (from the apple branch IIRC): libojc is built > > unconditionally, so objc must be in the --enable-languages option for > > the
2004 Dec 21
1
[LLVMdev] More on Cygwin
Hi all, After successfully building llvm tools-only and cfontend, I went back to llvm directory and ran configure --with-llvmgccdir=$CFEINSTALL Unfortunately, at the end of the process I got the following configure: WARNING: ***** llvm C/C++ front end was not found, or does not configure: WARNING: ***** appear to be working. And I do have CFEINSTALL environment variable.... BTW, I have noticed
2006 Apr 20
0
[LLVMdev] trying to bootstrap gcc 4.0.1 and the cvs llvm
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, [UTF-8] Rafael Esp?ndola wrote: > I am trying to bootstrap the just released gcc 4.0.1 and the cvs head llvm. > > I was able to build the llvm tools without a problem. > gcc has a small problem (from the apple branch IIRC): libojc is built > unconditionally, so objc must be in the --enable-languages option for > the build to be successful. > > Building
2004 Aug 16
3
[LLVMdev] Re: [llvm-announce] LLVM 1.3 Release!]
Chris Lattner wrote: >On Sun, 15 Aug 2004, Robert Feldt wrote: > > > >>However, I wonder if someone supplies pre-built cfrontend binaries for >>cygwin? >> >> > >Nope, we don't have one yet, sorry. > > > >>I followed the instructions and tried to build them myself but get >>when building the cfrontend. Any ideas? >>
2018 Mar 20
3
[LLD/ELF] - Should we implement .note.gnu.property and/or Intel CET in LLD ?
Linux GABI [1] introduced new .note.gnu.property section which contains a program property note which describes special handling requirements for linker and run-time loader. LLD does not support .note.gnu.property yet. GABI specifies 2 types of entries: GNU_PROPERTY_STACK_SIZE and GNU_PROPERTY_NO_COPY_ON_PROTECTED: * GNU_PROPERTY_STACK_SIZE: Its pr_data field contains an integer in the format
2004 Aug 16
0
[LLVMdev] Re: [llvm-announce] LLVM 1.3 Release!]
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 01:07:39PM +0200, Robert Feldt wrote: > However, when I go back to rebuild llvm, reconfigure, setting the > CFEINSTALL dir, then make it can build the tools ok but not the > runtime: [snip] > Compiling crtend.c to bytecode > Files/ATI: not found [snip] > I don't understand the error message since I see no reference to > Files/ATI. Any clues? Can
2004 Nov 14
2
[LLVMdev] IMPORTANT: llvm-ar requirements
Ignore this at your own peril. I have committed changes to CVS that introduce a fully functional llvm-ar tool, and a new lib/Linker library that uses the archive's symbol table to hasten linking. However, this implies that archives read by the LLVM tools *must* have an LLVM symbol table in them. This happens automatically for the crtend.a library, but not for the runtime libraries produced by
2004 Apr 08
1
Building 3.7-p1 on i686-pc-linux-gnu for execution on i386-pc-linux-gnu
I have a small single-board computer (SBC) I'd like to run OpenSSH on, but when I build the binaries on my development station and copy them over, I get "Illegal Instruction" errors when running them (sshd, ssh-keygen, ssh-add, ssh-agent, ssh-keyscan). I have successfully built zlib 1.2.1 and tested it with minigzip on the SBC, so I don't think the problem is with zlib. I have
2004 Nov 11
2
[LLVMdev] install-bytecode no longer works
But there already was an "install", and it did far more than install the bytecode files. That changed too? On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 23:28:27 -0800 Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > Yeah, its just "install" now. > > I'll fix the documentation. > > Reid. > > On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 23:19, Jeff Cohen wrote: > > My rebuild from scratch
2005 Nov 25
1
ssh/scp at Redhat Enterprise 3 (2.4.21-32.ELsmp #1 SMP Fri Apr 15 21:17:59 EDT 2005 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux)
Dear People, I have following situation with "OpenSSH_3.6.1p2, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0x0090701f": a) I will send files via scp to: "OpenSSH_3.8p1, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0.9.7d 17 Mar 2004" b) used command: scp [-vvv] -p -B -C /home/gdg/generation/cr/test_lnx50/lnx50.test2.000001 gdg at lnx50:/home/gdg/EMPFANG/lnx50.test2 Login without PW runs fine,
2018 Mar 20
0
[LLD/ELF] - Should we implement .note.gnu.property and/or Intel CET in LLD ?
I think we should wait until there is someone wanting to use these features with lld. Cheers, Rafael ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On March 20, 2018 6:59 AM, George Rimar <grimar at accesssoftek.com> wrote: > Linux GABI [1] introduced new .note.gnu.property section which contains a program > property note which describes special handling requirements for linker and run-time
2004 Apr 08
2
Building 3.7-p1 on i686-pc-linux-gnu for execution oni386-pc-linux-gnu
Peter, thanks for the idea! I did it exactly as you described... and I still get "Illegal instruction" on the 386 platform. I also tried # CFLAGS='-mcpu=i386 -march=i386' ./configure --prefix=/my/prefix/here and # CFLAGS="-mcpu=i386 -march=i386" ./configure --prefix=/my/prefix/here just for grins, and all had the same result. Still trying... Thanks, Mike >