Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Regarding exceptions (new to this list)"
2006 May 01
0
[LLVMdev] Regarding exceptions (new to this list)
On Sun, 30 Apr 2006, Aristid Breitkreuz wrote:
> I am, as said in the subject, new to this list. I have not actually used
> LLVM, I tried with an older version but failed. Recently I noticed that
> 1.7 came out and looked at the release notes. And there was something
> that stroke me: llvm-g++ adheres to the IA64 ABI but _not for
> exceptions_. I was not able to find information why
2016 Feb 08
3
[LLD] Is there any reason to add _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ to .dynsym?
When LLD builds a shared library for x86_64 it puts
_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ to the both .symtab and .dynsym and defines it
as a GLOBAL symbol. If later this shared library participates in
executable file linking and GNU BFD linked is used for that, this
linker shows an error:
/usr/bin/ld: a.out: hidden symbol `_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_' in
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/crt1.o is referenced by DSO
Gold
2015 Oct 05
7
[PATCH 0/4] Improve linker scripts
From: Sylvain Gault <sylvain.gault at gmail.com>
These patches basically remove unused linker scripts and port a change that was
made to an unused script.
Those are to be applied on top of the gcc 5 bug fixes as they would conflict
otherwise.
Sylvain Gault (4):
diag/mbr: fix dependency to linker script
Remove unused linker scripts
core: Make symbols defined in linker script HIDDEN
2015 Sep 29
10
[PATCH 0/2] Fixes for gcc 5
From: Sylvain Gault <sylvain.gault at gmail.com>
TL;DR: The section aligment in linker scripts messed-up the memory mapping
needed for the compression / decompression to work.
The bug with gcc 5 is not trivial, I'll do my best to explain it here.
Basically, there are two memory mappings of the code. One in "virtual memory",
and one in "load memory". The one in
2019 Mar 19
2
AArch64 tests failing
I'm seeing a bunch of failures on AArch64 after updating this morning.
These are NOT failing on x86-64. These all seem to be caused by
segfaults (example backtrace below). Is anyone else seeing this?
-David
LLVM :: DebugInfo/symbolize-no-debug-str.test
LLVM :: tools/gold/X86/comdat.ll
LLVM :: tools/gold/X86/visibility.ll
LLVM ::
2019 Jan 16
2
[RFC] Adding support for dynamic entries in yaml2obj
The goal of this proposal is to introduce a new type of YAML section for
yaml2obj that allows the population of ELF .dynamic entries via a list of
tag and value pairs. These entries are interpreted (and potentially
validated) before being written to the .dynamic section. The simplest way
to satisfy this requirement is for all dynamic entry values to be numeric
values. Unfortunately, this
2019 Feb 27
14
RFC: Linker feature for automatically partitioning a program into multiple binaries
Hi folks,
I'd like to propose adding a feature to ELF lld for automatically
partitioning a program into multiple binaries. (This will also involve
adding a feature to clang, so I've cc'd cfe-dev as well.)
== Problem statement ==
Embedded devices such as cell phones, especially lower end devices, are
typically highly resource constrained. Users of cell phone applications
must pay a
2020 Jun 02
2
LLD : __start_ and __end_ symbols for orphan sections
On 2020-06-02, Moshtaghi, Alireza wrote:
>Sorry for the cryptic code but I had to modify stuff from original
>In the following example see the difference when you comment or uncomment the line in the linker script:
>============ test.c ============= :
>struct orphan_dummy_anno_s {
> void (*func)(void);
>};
>
>static void dummy_export_dbg_log_init_f (void) __attribute__
2007 Mar 05
7
[PATCH 2/10] linux 2.6.18: COMPAT_VDSO
This adds support for CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO. As this will certainly raise
questions, I left in the code needed for an alternative approach (which
requires mode C code, but less build script changes).
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Index: head-2007-02-27/arch/i386/Kconfig
===================================================================
---
2007 Mar 05
7
[PATCH 2/10] linux 2.6.18: COMPAT_VDSO
This adds support for CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO. As this will certainly raise
questions, I left in the code needed for an alternative approach (which
requires mode C code, but less build script changes).
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Index: head-2007-02-27/arch/i386/Kconfig
===================================================================
---
2007 Mar 05
7
[PATCH 2/10] linux 2.6.18: COMPAT_VDSO
This adds support for CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO. As this will certainly raise
questions, I left in the code needed for an alternative approach (which
requires mode C code, but less build script changes).
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Index: head-2007-02-27/arch/i386/Kconfig
===================================================================
---
2011 Oct 12
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-objdump related patch
Michael,
I have rework the patch according to your suggestion. And I have
read binutil/objdump source code and found that it has a logic that if
there's no symtab, it will use dynsym, which is missing in llvm-objdump.
Songmao
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0002-Fix-the-address-calculation-for-llvm-objdump.patch
Type: text/x-patch
2019 Mar 02
2
RFC: Linker feature for automatically partitioning a program into multiple binaries
I covered the example of the operating system API in the original proposal,
but yes, you might also be able to use this for kernel modules. The
justification isn't as great for them since kernels typically require
linker scripts, and I'm not planning to make this compatible with linker
scripts. But if you did manage to write a kernel that didn't need a linker
script, this seems like it
2011 Oct 11
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-objdump related patch
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Neo <smtian at ingenic.cn> wrote:
> Hi,
> I am new to llvm, not familiar with c++, after some use with
> llvm-objdump, and finding the broken output, I try to debug and fix the code
> so it can become usable. Please help review the patch, so that they can be
> merged.
> And there's still two major problem I have found about arm
2008 Oct 21
5
Why could I get function names from a stripped exec?
Hello, all experts.
When I use pid provider, my Dscript with -F option output the codepath with flowindent as you know,
e.g.
-> main
-> f1
-> f2
however I realized that the exec file I used at that time was stripped.
Does anyone know the reason why I could see the function names?
Thanks in advance.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
2014 Feb 23
2
mk/efi.mk: Add libefi.a dependency
.From the commit mailinglist
Op 2014-02-23 om 10:57 schreef syslinux-bot for Gene Cumm:
> Commit-ID: 819783d0c8b5af43423e9e5bbe0e233c728d6346
> Gitweb: http://www.syslinux.org/commit/819783d0c8b5af43423e9e5bbe0e233c728d6346
> Author: Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com>
> AuthorDate: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 12:00:47 -0500
> Committer: Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com>
2017 Jul 04
2
Performance metrics with LLVM
Dear all,
I wanted to gather LLVM statistics with lnt and found a nice flag, but
am unsure how such statistics can be made available in the LNT web
interface.
--cmake-define=TEST_SUITE_COLLECT_STATS=ON
which allows me to gather all the LLVM "-stats" output. On top of this I
see that the LNT cmake test-suite also dumps code-size statistics when
running, that look as follows:
size:
2011 Oct 11
5
[LLVMdev] llvm-objdump related patch
Hi,
I am new to llvm, not familiar with c++, after some use with
llvm-objdump, and finding the broken output, I try to debug and fix the
code so it can become usable. Please help review the patch, so that they
can be merged.
And there's still two major problem I have found about arm
disassembler:
1. arm instruction decoder cannot recognise bx series instructions.
2. As gcc will
2006 Jul 24
1
klibc parisc64
I hacked out a rough first implementation of parisc64 for klibc
last month, and only just got around to testing it now.
The good news, it compiled fine on the first shot. The bad news,
it failed to link usr/klibc/libc.so, and I'm not clueful enough
to know why.
hppa64-linux-gnu-ld -Ttext 0x40001000 -o usr/klibc/libc.so --start-group
[...]
usr/klibc/socketcalls/recvmsg.o
2017 Jul 04
1
Performance metrics with LLVM
Hi Tobias,
The metrics that you can collect in LNT are fixed per "test suite".
There are 2 such "test suite"s defined in LNT at the moment: nts and compile.
For more details on this, see http://llvm.org/docs/lnt/concepts.html#test-suites.
AFAIK, If you need to collect different metrics, you'll need to define a new "test suite". I'm afraid I don't really