similar to: [LLVMdev] Creating Release 1.7 Branch at 1:00pm PDT

Branches have been created. You are free to checkin to cvs head again. I'll send mail once I have the prerelease tar balls up. Please continue to review and revise the documentation. I can fold this into the release later. Thanks, Tanya On Thu, 13 Apr 2006, Tanya Lattner wrote: > > I will be creating the release branch at 1:00pm PDT. Please refrain from > checking in from

The various intrinsic assert/crashes should all be fixed on mainline CVS (they are PR733, which I just fixed). The only ones that I'm wary of are: XPASS: /proj/llvm/build/../llvm/test/Regression/CFrontend/2004-02-20- StaticRedeclare.c.tr FAIL: /proj/llvm/build/../llvm/test/Regression/CFrontend/2005-12-04- DeclarationLineNumbers.c: In the former case, I would guess that the test isn't

I just updated again (both llvm and llvm-gcc). The only thing that changed was: P test/Regression/CFrontend/2005-12-04-DeclarationLineNumbers.c The regression test below was done *with* your llvm-gcc changes to llvm- expand.c. I don't know what the failures are all about, but I will try it again. If its the same, I'll let you know. Reid. On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 16:20 -0500, Chris Lattner

Here's what's left on Linux (GCC 4.1.0), after all updates that went into the branch: Running /proj/llvm/build/../llvm/test/Regression/CFrontend/dg.exp ... FAIL: /proj/llvm/build/../llvm/test/Regression/CFrontend/2004-02-12- LargeAggregateCopy.c.tr: gccas: /proj/llvm/build/../llvm/lib/VMCore/Function.cpp:266: unsigned int llvm::Function::getIntrinsicID() const: Assertion `0 &&

On Thu, 13 Apr 2006, Reid Spencer wrote: > I just updated again (both llvm and llvm-gcc). The only thing that > changed was: > P test/Regression/CFrontend/2005-12-04-DeclarationLineNumbers.c > > The regression test below was done *with* your llvm-gcc changes to llvm- > expand.c. I don't know what the failures are all about, but I will try > it again. If its the same,

Cyrille Mescam wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 11:02:10AM -0500, John Criswell wrote: > >>Cyrille Mescam wrote: >> [snip] > > In fact, i am using the CFE build procedures. I am on instructions 5. > > cyrille > Okay, I took a closer look at your output. I was correct in that gccas is attempting to assemble a native PPC assembly language file. However,

>> Is attached patch acceptable? > > Looks great, applied, thanks! > http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20050131/023931.html Thanks! >> Also I have in Makefile.rules (but not include in patch) some >> modification for simplify used common Makefile.rules in LLVM projects and >> non-LLVM project (guarding some LLVM specific parts by ifdef

On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 11:02:10AM -0500, John Criswell wrote: > Cyrille Mescam wrote: > >Hi, > > > > > >When compiling the cfrontend for Linux/PPC architecture on a powermac > >G5, i got > >the following error : > > I hate to ask a silly question, but are you using "make bootstrap" to > build the cfrontend? Your output looks like gccas

On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Tanu Sharma wrote: > I have been trying to randomize blocks in a program and modified > "BasicBlockPlacement.cpp" for the purpose but getting segmentation > fault.I am not able to determine the problem.Can anyone please decrypt > these error messages or suggest what might be the possible cause of > failure? I'd be happy to fix this, but I need

Hi, I have been trying to randomize blocks in a program and modified "BasicBlockPlacement.cpp" for the purpose but getting segmentation fault.I am not able to determine the problem.Can anyone please decrypt these error messages or suggest what might be the possible cause of failure? -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi, I'm having some problems cross-compiling from ppc (OS X) to x86 object files and to ia64, at all. I'd appreciate some advice as to whether or not I'm actually supposed to be able to do this, and what's wrong if so. Here's how I configured it: ../llvm-darcslocal/llvm/configure --with-llvmgccdir=$LLVMGCCDIR --prefix=$HOME/Documents/hpcl/LLVM/install The results work fine

Thanks a lot for replying Chris, I m trying to randomize the blocks in a program.I generate a random number( between the current "InsertPos" and the last block), and then iterate through the list of basicblocks , picking up block with position equal to that of the random number and place it into the current InsertPos and increment InsertPos. Running it like this:

OK, I noticed a few problems with my previous email, so I will boil the question down: What I want to do is compile for x86 and ia64 from darwin. I also want to load my own passes into opt and llc. Should I be using llvmc at all here, or should I be doing something like llvmgcc -> gccas -> opt -> llc ? I've given up on the filetype=obj argument, so now the problem is that llc is

1. If we run a few passes in a sequence ..is the bytecode file transformed after each pass in sequence i.e if we have a) opt -pass1 -pass2 -pass3 < in.bc > out.bc b)opt -pass1 -pass2 < in.bc > tmp.bc opt -pass3 < tmp.bc > out.bc are the above two equivalent ? what I basically want is to run my pass on an optimised bytecode , so should i optimize it and get a new bytecode

I got the following error in 1.5 release. As far as installation is concerned, everything went fine. llc hello.bc -o hello.bs llc((anonymous namespace)::PrintStackTrace()+0x17)[0xd435f1] llc((anonymous namespace)::SignalHandler(int)+0xbd)[0xd437ff] /lib64/tls/libc.so.6[0x3ff522e410] llc(llvm::Type::isFirstClassType() const+0x13)[0x8fc38d] llc(llvm::FunctionType::FunctionType(llvm::Type const*,

Hi, In my experiments, I need to disable several linking optimizations. However, bzip2, vortex and eon failed if "-disable-opt" was passed to gccld. I tried the out-of-box llvm and the building process provided by llvm-test. The same problem was observed, when I specified EXTRA_LINKTIME_OPT_FLAGS = -disable-opt on Makefile.program and simplied typed "make" under

HI , I understand that the standard C library functions are executed using the native library of the host machine. ( for example when we execute a bytecode to extract the profile info ) Is it possible to extract for each standard library function that is executed , the arguments that the function is called with. For example if printf ("%d", some_int ) when called during runtime

Hi, Thank Brian Gaeke so much. Following TraceBasicBlocks.cpp, I modified the code as below and could insert instruction or function I need into anywhere in Module. But it works well without BB->getInstList().push_back(InstrCall), and if I add the BB->getInstList().push_back() following new CallInst(), I got error information when runing opt. What is the reason for it? And is it necessary

On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 11:01:48AM +0200, Finn S Andersen wrote: > For some of the benchmarks the linear scan regalloc > works. When it does, results are in the x1.0 - 1.5 > range. Unfortunately, the linear scan allocator breaks > on most of my code. Is there a chance you can try cvs? I would be interested to get a simplified test case where the allocator breaks. A lot of

Dear LLVM guys, I am getting an error with my pass implementation, and I cannot figure it out. Basically, I've implemented part of a register allocation algorithm, but I am having problems to set the passes correctly. For instance, for this program below, the following error message is produced: .c ----------------------| .bc ---------------------------------