similar to: [LLVMdev] standalone build

is it ok to have the same install directory for the llvm tools and llvm-gcc? -- www.smsglobal.net SMS Global Ltd Short Message Service For Seafarers

On 4/19/06, Patrick Meredith <pmeredit at uiuc.edu> wrote: > I haven't seen anyone claim x86 linux objdir == srcdir, so I'll test it out. > Missed the 18th,but I'll try to have it done asap. > > > On Apr 18, 2006, at 2:51 PM, Robert L. Bocchino Jr. wrote: > I'll test on Darwin/PPC, precompiled llvmgcc, objdir == srcdir. > > Rob > Sorry for being

Rogelio Serrano wrote: > is it ok to have the same install directory for the llvm tools and llvm-gcc? Yes. I don't see why it wouldn't work. -- John T. > > -- > www.smsglobal.net SMS Global Ltd Short Message Service For Seafarers > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu

Is there an llvm objc frontend we can play with? If none then is there being written now? -- SMS Global Ltd Short Message Service For Seafarers -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20051213/c9765598/attachment.html>

On 4/19/06, Rogelio Serrano <rogelio.serrano at gmail.com> wrote: > On 4/16/06, Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: > > > > I've put the pre-release tar balls here: > > http://llvm.org/prereleases/1.7/ > > > > The build failed on i686-pc-linux-gnu. > > llvm[2]: Flexing FileLexer.l > llvm[2]: Compiling FileLexer.cpp for Release build

On 4/16/06, Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: > > I've put the pre-release tar balls here: > http://llvm.org/prereleases/1.7/ > The build failed on i686-pc-linux-gnu. llvm[2]: Flexing FileLexer.l llvm[2]: Compiling FileLexer.cpp for Release build /home/rogelio/Desktop/llvm/utils/TableGen/FileLexer.l: In function 'int Filelex()':

I have flex version 2.5.31, gcc version 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-13), and am obviously using Debian. I would assume that the reason your build fails and mine succeeds in due to one (or more) of those things being different ;-) On Apr 19, 2006, at 2:19 AM, Rogelio Serrano wrote: > On 4/19/06, Patrick Meredith <pmeredit at uiuc.edu> wrote: >> I haven't seen anyone claim x86

How does the cfrontend generate llvm ir? by adding an llvm ir backend to gcc or modifying the gcc c frontend? -- www.smsglobal.net SMS Global Ltd Short Message Service For Seafarers

I've put the pre-release tar balls here: http://llvm.org/prereleases/1.7/ I'm asking for help to test this release and to review documentation. If anyone can spare some time to help out, I would really appreciate it. The more people that test, the better this release will be. Secondly, now that the tarballs have been created, everyone is free to check in documentation changes into the

Hi, I just saw this thread. I work on llvm at Xilinx but I do not work on microblaze. I will check to see if there is any interest here at Xilinx to contribute resources to the maintenance of this backend. Thanks, Jeff On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 7:38 PM, Rogelio Serrano <rogelio.serrano at gmail.com>wrote: > > On Feb 6, 2013 4:52 AM, "Chandler Carruth" <chandlerc at

Hi jeff! Any news? On Feb 9, 2013 1:53 AM, "Jeff Fifield" <fifield at mtnhigh.net> wrote: > Hi, > > I just saw this thread. I work on llvm at Xilinx but I do not work on > microblaze. > > I will check to see if there is any interest here at Xilinx to contribute > resources to the maintenance of this backend. > > Thanks, > Jeff > > > > On

On Feb 6, 2013 4:52 AM, "Chandler Carruth" <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote: > > The MBlaze backend seems to be essentially unmaintained since 2011. The maintainer (Wesley Peck who is BCC'ed) seems to have vanished, and in fact all emails to him are bouncing. > > I propose to remove the MBlaze backend on Friday if none step forward as a maintainer. Currently, folks

Hi , One of the things I am working on requires me to have a kernel and an initrd (as root filesystem , based on busybox) in one single image. I am trying to use initramfs for this, but there are a few things that I just can't figure out. As a test, I made a cpio archive of my own for the kernel source (plain 2.6.0-test5). Everything gets unpacked just fine during boot. Somehow I was

I tried building with linux-2.6.0-test7 build dies with: make[1]: Entering directory `/home/rogelio/src/klibc-0.80/klibc' gcc -Wp,-MD,./.fork.d -march=i386 -Os -fomit-frame-pointer -malign-functions=0 -malign-jumps=0 -malign-loops=0 -nostdinc -iwithprefix include -I../klibc -I../klibc/arch/i386/include -I../klibc/include/bits32 -D__KLIBC__ -DBITSIZE=32 -I../klibc/include

Im using snapshot 0.81. make[1]: Entering directory `/home/rogelio/src/klibc-0.81/klibc' gcc -Wp,-MD,./.getenvtest.d -march=i386 -Os -falign-functions=0 -falign-jumps=0 -falign-loops=0 -nostdinc -iwithprefix include -I../klibc -I../klibc/arch/i386/include -I../klibc/include/bits32 -D__KLIBC__ -DBITSIZE=32 -I../klibc/include -I../linux/include -W -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings

I haven't seen anyone claim x86 linux objdir == srcdir, so I'll test it out. Missed the 18th,but I'll try to have it done asap. On Apr 18, 2006, at 2:51 PM, Robert L. Bocchino Jr. wrote: > I'll test on Darwin/PPC, precompiled llvmgcc, objdir == srcdir. > > Rob > > On Apr 16, 2006, at 1:42 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > >> On Sun, 16 Apr 2006, Tanya Lattner

I'll test on Darwin/PPC, precompiled llvmgcc, objdir == srcdir. Rob On Apr 16, 2006, at 1:42 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Sun, 16 Apr 2006, Tanya Lattner wrote: >> For testing, we would like a mix of people to do x86 and ppc. >> Please send email to the list if you plan to test, what >> architecture, and if you will use the llvm-gcc binary or compile >> it

Doesn't seem to get a lot of love since most of the commits in the last 3 years have been maintenance. I guess it doesn't take a whole lot of maintenance either, but... cc'ing Wesley since he seems to be the last guy to commit to it. Thoughts? -eric

The MBlaze backend seems to be essentially unmaintained since 2011. The maintainer (Wesley Peck who is BCC'ed) seems to have vanished, and in fact all emails to him are bouncing. I propose to remove the MBlaze backend on Friday if none step forward as a maintainer. Currently, folks are having to keep it up to date when changing shared parts of the backend with no help. -Chandler

Chandler brought up removing it back in February but Rogelio Serrano said he could maintain it and Jeff Fifield from Xilinx was supposed to check if someone could help. If no one has stepped up in the past 5 months, then I don't see an issue with removing it. Micah > -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] > On