similar to: [LLVMdev] line number information

The debug intrinsics are intended for that. Please see: http://llvm.org/docs/SourceLevelDebugging.html for the details. Please note that this is being worked on actively Jim Laskey at Apple. He's working to get these intrinsics to generate DWARF output so that LLVM generated code can be used with a debugger. However, the intrinsics can be processed in whatever way you'd like via an LLVM

Thanks for your help. I took a look at http://llvm.org/docs/SourceLevelDebugging.html and it seems like this doesn't give you much in the way of line number information. If you know what source line you are interested in then you can set a breakpoint, but suppose you want to know the line number in the source code for some arbitrary bytecode instruction. In my particular case, I have a pass

On Sat, 8 Apr 2006, Jim Laskey wrote: > If you look at the stoppoint calls you'll see that you can find the line > number and if you follow the compile unit argument on the call you will find > the file. The byte codes that follow the call would have been generated by > the code on that source line. I'd suggest an approach like this: Given an instruction in the a basic

John, If you look at the stoppoint calls you'll see that you can find the line number and if you follow the compile unit argument on the call you will find the file. The byte codes that follow the call would have been generated by the code on that source line. -- Jim On Apr 8, 2006, at 5:33 AM, John Trimble wrote: > Thanks for your help. I took a look at http://llvm.org/docs/

I get it now, I can't believe I didn't understand that before. Thank you all for your help! - John On 4/8/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > > On Sat, 8 Apr 2006, Jim Laskey wrote: > > If you look at the stoppoint calls you'll see that you can find the line > > number and if you follow the compile unit argument on the call you will > find >

Hi, I would like to know how much effect these stoppoint calls have on the optimization of the bytecode? DOes insertion of debugging info cause opportunities for optimization (especially interprocedural dead code elimination and interprocedural constant propogation) to be reduced? The -g code is not very readable, so I am not able to confirm this by my own experiment. Thanks! Nikhil On Sat,

Hi all LLVMdev! Here is a question: I try to understand how I can realize a debugging in LLVM!? I have written a back end for my target and now I need a debug. I asked developers Chris Lattner and Robert L. Bocchino. They recommend me ask the LLVMdev. Is there a tool like "llvm-db" about Robert said? Here a mail from Robert: On Jun 29, 2009, at 17:14 PM, Robert L. Bocchino

NOTE: Starting tomorrow (Aug 1, 2006) the llvm-gcc4 repository will be moved to svn://anonsvn.opensource.apple.com/svn/llvm/trunk. This is to support tagging and future releases. I am told if you go to your llvm svn directory you can; svn switch --relocate svn://anonsvn.opensource.apple.com/svn/llvm svn://anonsvn.opensource.apple.com/svn/llvm/trunk Cheers, -- Jim -------------- next

On 12/2/06, Jim Laskey <jlaskey at apple.com> wrote: > Rafael, > > Please bracket portions of your changes that involve modification of > C/C++ source code. For cases of modifying configuration scripts and > make files, use your best judgement. Obviously having the brackets > emitted in generated code is problematic (line numbers et cetera), so > don't bother in

Hi all! I am from the Windows world and am trying to migrate to Linux and have done a fairly good job so far. My recent challenge is that I have built a Samba file/print server that works very well on my internal network but when I VPN into the network remotely I am unable to access the server via it's server name. What is driving me crazy is the fact that the last of my Windows

Apologies. Looks like the merges didn't take. I'll try and straighten this out today. Watch for the posting tomorrow. Cheers, -- Jim On Aug 1, 2006, at 7:59 AM, Jim Laskey wrote: > Still hasn't gone through yet. I'm predicting 11am EST. > > Cheers, > > -- Jim > > > > On Jul 31, 2006, at 7:18 PM, Jim Laskey wrote: > >> NOTE: Starting

I had to revert these changes. When I did a clean build I was inundated with errors. I'm not sure if I made the cut off time for the mirror. -- Jim On Dec 5, 2006, at 8:35 AM, Jim Laskey wrote: > This patch should be in today's mirror ~6am PST. > > Cheers, > > -- Jim > > On Dec 4, 2006, at 4:32 PM, Rafael Espíndola wrote: > >> On 12/2/06, Jim Laskey

On Thu, 3 Aug 2006, Jim Laskey wrote: > To force the load/linking of your register allocator into the llc/lli tools, > add your create function's global declaration to "Passes.h" and add a > "pseudo" call line to "llvm/Codegen/LinkAllCodegenComponents.h" . Another note: with this new functionality you should be able to dynamically load register

Dear all, I am using Samba 3.0.20-4 SUSE. When a user (under Windows) modifies an Excel or Word file, he/she becomes the owner of that file !!! I have read that this is because Excel & Word delete the original file and recreate a new one with the modifications. But I didn't find a solution to prevent this. Thank you in advance for your reply. Ivan Tadic Brussels, Belgium

I am having trouble with getting my Homes section to work properly. When I browse to the server from a Windows client, I can see my home directory. However, when I try to access it, it challenges me for a userID and password. No matter what I enter, I will not allow me access. Can someone point me in the right direction to solve this? Here are the errors... [2006/03/27 11:19:22, 0]

Hi All, I''m new on ZFS, so I hope this isn''t too basic a question. I have a host where I setup ZFS. The Oracle DBAs did their thing and I know have a number of ZFS datasets with their respective clones and snapshots on serverA. I want to export some of the clones to serverB. Do I need to zone serverB to see the same LUNs as serverA? Or does it have to have preexisting,

Hi, I have a samba server sharing some stuff. Now i want to enable access to some share only to SOME users on the domain. this is the smb.conf : [global] netbios name = DATASVR server string = DATASVR socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=16384 SO_SNDBUF=16384 idmap uid = 10000-20000 idmap gid = 10000-20000 winbind enum users = yes

The build is failing with; LiveIntervalAnalysis.cpp:218: error: floating constant exceeds range of 'double' LiveIntervalAnalysis.cpp:253: error: floating constant exceeds range of 'double' LiveIntervalAnalysis.cpp:328: error: floating constant exceeds range of 'double' LiveIntervalAnalysis.cpp:1350: error: floating constant exceeds range of 'double' If I

Hi All, I'm putting together the announcement for the LLVM 1.6 release. Here is what I have so far. Because so much has been done, it is very likely that I have forgotten something. If you have done something that is not on the list, please send me a private email so I can add it (also, please tell me if I've made a mistake or miscredited something)! My next project is to start

I am seeing some extremely slow logons to my SUSE servers. All are configured exactly the same. When I attempt to log on, I can enter my domain (AD) account without any problems. I then enter my password and sit and wait for several minutes until it eventually takes me to my desktop. In attempting to debug the problem, we have been able to see millions of calls to the domain controller. They