similar to: [LLVMdev] Running LLVM Analysis on real-world projects.

On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 04:27:55PM +0530, Pratik Mehta wrote: > I have made few attempts to compile some software packages with llvm. > My approach is to define Make variables as follows : > > export AS=llvm-as > export LD=llvm-ld > export AR=llvm-ar > export CXX=llvm-g++ > > and then run configure and make. > > This approach works with very small code bases

Thanks for your valuable input. By the way, I am exporting CC=llvm-gcc and RANLIB=llvm-ranlib for projects that use it. It was a mistake not to write it in the post as apache indeed uses gcc. If you see the error message, you would see llvm-gcc being used. I would try to investigate further on the lines you have mentioned. However, the question that stands is how to best handle failure to compile

Hi John, Thank you for your advice. LIBS and LDFLAGS work for the configure script, but they gave errors in the make stage for apache and mysql. I used either of the following ones with other flags: - export LIBS="-L/home/sangmin/Dropbox/Falcon/bin/ -ldummy" - export LDFLAGS="-L/home/sangmin/Dropbox/Falcon/bin/ -ldummy" Here are the error messages: Compile error (apache):

On 3/24/11 6:23 PM, Sangmin Park wrote: > Hi, > > I need advice in instrumenting programs using liblto and gold plugin. > Specifically, I added my pass in tools/lto/LTOCodeGenerator.cpp. > My pass inserts functions (myLoad and myStore) for some load and store > instructions. > The functions exist in a library file. > > I found that the approach works for the example in

Hi, I need advice in instrumenting programs using liblto and gold plugin. Specifically, I added my pass in tools/lto/LTOCodeGenerator.cpp. My pass inserts functions (myLoad and myStore) for some load and store instructions. The functions exist in a library file. I found that the approach works for the example in the link: http://llvm.org/docs/GoldPlugin.html $ llvm-gcc -flto a.c -c -o a.o $ ar q

Has anyone built an rpm for xboard for CentOS 4? I looked in the EPEL repo, KBS repo and rpmforge but none exist. The KBS repo has gnuchess in testing but what good is gnuchess without xboard? As usual the fedora SRPM for Fedora 6 and Fedora 9 cannot build on CentOS 4- they might build on CentOS 6 but i have no time machine :). -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

Actually, Misha, that won't work. The -C option is used directly in docs/Makefile. So the change will have to go into docs/Makefile. Either that or upgrade install to version 5. Reid. On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 11:33, Misha Brukman wrote: > On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 01:21:20PM -0600, Feng Chen wrote: > > llvm[1]: Installing HTML documentation > >

hi, I'm really new to llvm. I've successfully bootstrapped llvm-14 on my system and am able to successfully compile c code to llvm. the problem is now that gccld is complaining that it can't find the libraries, like "c" or "crtend". [1] all is fine, if I just use intrinsified functions like printf and friends, but I want to use the clock_gettime function and

Hello, Does any have Apache 2.0.49 with tomcat 5.5.4 and jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk2-2.0.4 working??? Apache was allready installed with CentOS 3 I installed tomcat with it's tar.gz file and instalation was good. but I installed first the j2sdk-1_4_2_06-linux-i586 java version... everything was OK... but when I try to install the jakarta-tomcat-connector I get an error when executing the

On Wednesday 04 May 2005 18:34, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Wed, 4 May 2005, Vladimir Prus wrote: > > %tmp.aux = cast bool %tmp.24 to int > > %tmp.x = xor int %tmp.aux, 1 ; negates tmp.24 > > %tmp.xx = cast int %tmp.x to bool > > %tmp.y = or bool %tmp.xx, %tmp.24 ; will be always true > > br bool %tmp.y,

On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 11:30:45AM -0600, Feng Chen wrote: > However, although the configuration and installation process doesn't > report any error/warning, the llvmc cannot work. It just says: > Unexpected unknown exception occurred :( > > Do you have any clue about that? Have you compiled and installed llvm-gcc/llvm-g++? llvmc is not a compiler, it's just a compiler

I am investigating some inlining issue, so I did llvm-gcc aaa.c bbb.c ... nnn.c -o output opt -inline -inline-threshold=xxx < output.bc | llc -march=c > output_inline.c 1) I noticed that even if I set xxx to 0 or even a very small negative number, many functions are eliminated. I am wondering if these functions are inlined by the frontend, or identified as deadcode. For instance,

Robert, Thanks for the info, you've confirmed what I was trying to do, but when I compile: ----------------------- #include <stdio.h> int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { printf("yo\n"); return 0; } ----------------------- without "-c" (llvm-gcc t1.c -o t1) the dissassembled bytecode does not call __main: ----------------------- ; ModuleID =

On May 5, Misha Brukman wrote: > Maybe we can use you for a testimonial... :) Certainly. > > Tail Call Elimination: > > > > I've read over the "Random llvm notes", and see that you guys have > > though about this already. > > > > However, the note dates from last year, so I am wondering if there is > > an implementation in the works.

I'm CC'ing the llvm-dev list because other people are more knowledgeable about the bytecode format/encoding than I am. Please follow-up the replies to the list. On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 11:27:53AM -0700, Yiping Fan wrote: > We also want to extend the llvm instructions/intrinsic > functions/types/passes to support our high-level synthesis for > hardware. First of all, we want to

On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 07:01:40AM +0200, Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer wrote: > While trying to hunt down a codegen bug (not yet found) ... Have you considered using bugpoint for your codegen debugging needs? http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/Bugpoint.html#codegendebug > I've collected some small patches you might find useful. Sweet! > Please review and apply as you see fit. I've

Hi all LLVMor, I just tried to compile a simple code and analyze the number of the basic blocks. But after compile, what I got, the bytecode is seems to be optimized bytecode. So the information of basic blocks is not what I expected. I want ot use the code as example to see how some of code optimization methods work. However, after compiling file using llvm test.c -o test, bytecode file

Suppose, I have a Pass1 implemented as a subclass of Pass, with source code in the directory of llvm source base( transform/analyze ) I can run that pass through opt on the bytecode emitted by gcc frontend through opt tool. However, I want that Pass1 to be the part of the actual GCC compiler. I want to know how I can position Pass1 among other passes /optimizations/ code generations. e.g if

Hi, I am wondering whether the bytecode generated by my llvm-gcc is correct? When I run $ llvm-gcc hello.c -o hello What I get is hello.exe.bc, and hello.exe (I can actually llvm-dis the bytecode file which is hello.exe.bc). However, I do not get a shell script(named hello) as stated in the documentation... Best Regards, Kiat On 5/25/05, Aaron Gray <angray at beeb.net> wrote: >

Martin Andersen wrote: > > Hi! > > I have installed Codeweavers Preview 3, and have a > windows partition. I run Blitzin (www.chessclub.com) and it > starts up ok, but it cannot connect to the server. I have disabled the > firewall on my linuxbox. > > Any ideas ? > > Martin. Hi Martin, I have tried to run Blitzin under WINE as well and the outcome is that