similar to: [LLVMdev] Keyword documenation for target, deplibs ...

Robert, Thanks for the info, you've confirmed what I was trying to do, but when I compile: ----------------------- #include <stdio.h> int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { printf("yo\n"); return 0; } ----------------------- without "-c" (llvm-gcc t1.c -o t1) the dissassembled bytecode does not call __main: ----------------------- ; ModuleID =

Misha Brukman wrote: > On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 10:00:18PM -0800, Wink Saville wrote: > > [snip] > If you're using -c, you're telling LLVM that there are other modules you > will link into the executable. Thus, LLVM does not know whether there > will be static ctors/dtors to run or not, so there's the call to > __main() from main. > > __main() gets

Hello, When I compile a "hello.c" program with a printf in "main" and use llvm-gcc with a "-c" option: llvm-gcc -c t1.c -o t1.bc and then try to compile t1.bc to native using llc & gcc I get a call to "__main" which is undefined. If I don't use the "-c" option: llvm-gcc t1.c -o t1 I don't get a reference to

On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 10:00:18PM -0800, Wink Saville wrote: > Thanks for the info, you've confirmed what I was trying to do, but when > I compile: [snip] > without "-c" (llvm-gcc t1.c -o t1) the dissassembled bytecode does not > call __main: __main() is used to run static constructors and destructors, so if you're compiling without -c, LLVM knows all the files

On Sun, 26 Feb 2006, Wink Saville wrote: > I then do the following in my makefile: > > llvm-gcc -c t1.c -o t1.bc > llvm-gcc -c t1sub1.c -o t1sub1.bc > llvm-gcc -c t1sub2.c -o t1sub2.bc > llvm-ar r t1.a t1sub1.bc t1sub2.bc > llvm-ar: creating t1.a > llvm-ld -o t1.app t1.bc t1.a /opt/llvm-1.6/llvm-gcc/lib/libcrtend.a > llvm-ld: warning: Cannot find library 'crtend'

The -c option tells llvm-gcc to build a bytecode file without linking in the LLVM runtime library. This is similar to the -c option for regular gcc, which you use to build multiple separate .o files that you're going to link into a single executable. If you want to build from a single source file, it's easiest just to compile without the -c option. If you're building from

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Sun, 26 Feb 2006, Wink Saville wrote: >> I then do the following in my makefile: >> >> llvm-gcc -c t1.c -o t1.bc >> llvm-gcc -c t1sub1.c -o t1sub1.bc >> llvm-gcc -c t1sub2.c -o t1sub2.bc >> llvm-ar r t1.a t1sub1.bc t1sub2.bc >> llvm-ar: creating t1.a >> llvm-ld -o t1.app t1.bc t1.a /opt/llvm-1.6/llvm-gcc/lib/libcrtend.a

Hello, Last night I checked out the head of CVS and tried to compile after configuring with: ./configure --enable-debug-runtime --enable-jit --prefix=/opt/lvm-cvs I then got a message indicating that Line 1099 of Makefile.rules has 8 leading spaces instead of a tab, I fixed that and then the build completed, although there were 6 warnings (http://www.saville.com/llvm/make1.out). Reid

I've updated the arch linux bug (https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/50385) with a patch for glibc in the arch linux packages that does fix the segment fault for me. On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 12 September 2016 at 22:02, Wink Saville <wink at saville.com> wrote: >> I then cloned the gcc 2.24 sources as of today and

With the new signature file I was able to verify, but there was still a bad signature: "gpg: key 0x0FC3042E345AD05D: 1 bad signature" which I highlighted below. Didn't seem to be a problem, but thought I'd point it out. I'd be glad to do additional tests if you'd like. $ gpg --list-keys /home/wink/.gnupg/pubring.kbx ----------------------------- pub

And again... LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB:BOOL=ON LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB:BOOL=ON This one is the good one... maybe. On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 11:35 PM, Alexandre Isoard < alexandre.isoard at gmail.com> wrote: > That is because I mistyped it: > LLVM_ENABLE_LLVM_DYLIB:BOOL=ON > LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB:BOOL=ON > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 11:31 PM, Wink Saville <wink at saville.com>

I've gone through Code Reviews with Phabriactor[1], Arcanist Quick Start[2] and Arcanist User Guide arc diff[3]. But I'm unable to setup reviewers my editor pops up and there is a "Reviewers:" line and but I'm unable email addresses directly. It seems it wants reviewers passed on the command line or some how in .arcconfig. But I haven't been able to find any

Please do the bisect, nice to hear it recently worked! At this point I built mean with debug and its failing with initializing a LFStack doing an atomic operation, IIRC. On Sun, Sep 11, 2016, 9:09 AM Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 7 September 2016 at 18:41, Wink Saville via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Further more, there is a

Hello, I've installed LVM 1.6 and followed the getting started instructions and lli hello.bc works fine but when I convert it to hello.native it seg faults. AMD64 machine uname -a: Linux hp5kuw 2.6.12-10-amd64-k8 # Mon Jan 16 17:23:13 UTC 2006 x86_64 GNU/Linux llvm-gcc --version outputs: llvm-gcc (GCC) 3.4-llvm 20051104 (LLVM 1.6) What have I done wrong? Wink Saville

Hi try this function ive written it should be self explantory but let me know if you have any problems. I've only been using R for a few eeeks so apologies if its not the most efficient! rankit2<-function(rankvar,cuts,data,factor) { ranker<-rankvar ranker<-0 range<-c(1:cuts) range2<-range/cuts range3<-quantile(factor,range2) over<-length(factor) for (i in 1:over){

There is no x86_64 code generator at this time. Wink Saville wrote: > Hello, > > I've installed LVM 1.6 and followed the getting started instructions > and lli hello.bc works fine but when I convert it to hello.native it > seg faults. > > AMD64 machine uname -a: > > Linux hp5kuw 2.6.12-10-amd64-k8 # Mon Jan 16 17:23:13 UTC 2006 > x86_64 GNU/Linux > >

Hello, In reading the language reference manual I don't see any capability to perform atomic operations or issue sys calls and or software interrupts. I see here, http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-11/msg01031.html, that Anthony asked about atomic operations but I didn't see an answer. Regarding syscall I see some discussions but no explanation of why it wasn't included. Cheers,

Hello, As previously mentioned I had a linking problem using llvm-ld (http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2006-February/005246.html) I was getting a error if I used -L switch when linking using the following command line: llvm-ld -o t1.app t1.bc t1.a -L/opt/llvm-1.6/llvm-gcc/lib -lcrtend I believe I've tracked down the problem; in the "main" of tools/llvm-ld.cpp the

Hi all, I have a queston about Categorical response. i have a data frame containing age, sex, class, success(1=success, 0=non sucess). age, sex,class are the explantory variables, and sucess is the response variable. and i can get n (the nunber of times each age occurs) and r (the number of sucess of that age). when I try to creat the regression relationship for these variables, I have seen

I'm trying to fit a generalized mixed effects model to a data set where each subject has paired categorical responses y (so I'm trying to use a binomial logit link). There are about 183 observations and one explanatory factor x. I'm trying to fit something like: (lmer(y~x+(1|subject))) I also tried fitting the same type of model using glmmPQL from MASS. In both cases, I get a