similar to: [LLVMdev] printing constants

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 900 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] printing constants"

2006 Mar 02
1
[LLVMdev] Re: LLVMdev Digest, Vol 21, Issue 2
hello everybody, here I have a question regarding printing of the constants( like 2 .63 etc.,) present in the instruction while iterating over the instructions within a basic block . I am able to print the vaiables but not the constants. Can you please tell me how to get the constants printed out while iterating over the instructions because the constants do not have names as the variables do(
2006 Feb 15
2
[LLVMdev] question-TUD, germany
hi everyone, here i have a question: is there any chance in llvm intermediate representation to compare whether a operand (ie a value) is used as a user without iterating over all the instructions in a basic block. i will explain this with an example: i=p+4; j=i+p; in the above example i mean p,4,i,p which are on the RHS are operands and the terms i,j which are on the LHS are users. so what i
2006 Mar 21
1
[LLVMdev] Re: LLVMdev Digest, Vol 21, Issue 27
Sir, I am using LLVM Compiler for my Maters Dissertation work. So I want to include one chapter on LLVM in my report. Can I copy some of the figures from your documentation which is available on the net and keep them in my work ? thanking you, yours sincerely, Suresh Anubham TU-Darmstadt Germany Anubham Suresh Measurement and Instrumentation Electrical Department IIT Roorkee Current
2006 Mar 03
1
[LLVMdev] printing constants
Sir, I am using the op_begin and op_end iterator for iterating over the operands as mentioned below. for (User::op_iterator operand=j->op_begin(),operand_end=j->op_end();operand!=operand_end;++operand){ Value *v=operand->get(); const Type *t=v->getType(); cerr<<endl<<" operand: "<<"[ "<<v->hasName()<<"
2006 Feb 15
0
[LLVMdev] question-TUD, germany
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 04:29, anubham suresh wrote: > hi everyone, > here i have a question: > is there any chance in llvm intermediate > representation to compare whether a operand (ie a > value) is used as a user without iterating over all > the instructions in a basic block. > i will explain this with an example: > i=p+4; > j=i+p; > > in the above example i
2019 Jun 24
4
Expected behavior of lld during LTO for global symbols (Attr Internal/Common)
The direct cause of this issue is that, previously lld converted common symbols to defined symbols before passing input files to LTO, and after r360841 they are passed as common symbols to LTO. Making lld to work as before is easy, as we can convert common symbols to defined symbols as before. Here is a patch to do that, and I confirmed that that restores the original behavior for the reported
2020 May 15
2
Issues with new Attributor (replaceAllUses fails with type mismatch)
Hi Suresh, thanks for reporting this! I thought I fixed this with 8d94d3c3b44c3a27a69b153cef9be4b8e481150e. Did you run before or after that commit? Cheers, Johannes On 5/15/20 7:17 AM, Mani, Suresh via llvm-dev wrote: > [AMD Public Use] > > Hi , > > Please ignore the earlier header of Internal and Official use only. > > Thanks > M Suresh > > From: llvm-dev
2019 Jun 21
2
Expected behavior of lld during LTO for global symbols (Attr Internal/Common)
Thanks for the info Teresa, Regards M Suresh From: Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2019 7:15 PM To: Mani, Suresh <Suresh.Mani at amd.com> Cc: Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com>; llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Expected behavior of lld during LTO for global symbols (Attr Internal/Common) [CAUTION: External
2015 Apr 16
3
Availability of the 1.1.1 stable version
Please provide the input file that produces this with opus_demo. On 16/04/15 03:24 AM, Suresh Thiriveedi wrote: > Hi Jean-Marc, > > Could you please update if you got a chance to look into. As I > mentioned, I don't see the same issue in 1.1.1, but I don't see any > difference in 1.1.1 other than optimization based on the architecture. > This optimization could have
2015 Apr 16
2
Availability of the 1.1.1 stable version
To be decodable by opus_demo, you'll have to add the 8-byte "header". Just put in the length of the packet followed by "0" for the encoder range (0 means "not present"). That being said, from previous experience, the most likely cause of the crash is a bug in your software causing a corruption in Opus. So it's safe to assume that if you can't reproduce
2019 Jun 20
2
Expected behavior of lld during LTO for global symbols (Attr Internal/Common)
Hi Teresa, Can you please let me know if there is any update on this issue. Thanks M Suresh From: Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2019 7:23 PM To: Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> Cc: Mani, Suresh <Suresh.Mani at amd.com>; llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Expected behavior of lld during LTO for global symbols
2016 Oct 04
2
encoder with FEC+DTX enabled but not detecting noise
Hi, When we pass around 9K samples of only ambient noise (no voice), the encoder which is enabled FEC+DTX is detecting only some 140 frames as non-voice (returning only TOC, no frame content). We were expecting all or more to be identified as non-voice. Our idea was to check how the decoder re-generates the original ambient noise during the silence duration (when we feed NULL to decoder) when
2010 Oct 14
5
Restricting samba subfolder acl changes to admin users
Dear samba team, What I noticed from the below example is , any user who has write access to share are able to change sub folder acls in it. we don't want that. how to restrict this to only admin users in NAS and to AD administrator in windows. ?. Please help . ---------------- 1) Import user from W2K3 R2 Server and set up a secure share. User has Read/Write access. 2)
2015 Apr 21
3
Availability of the 1.1.1 stable version
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.4 (Santiago) gcc version 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-3) (GCC) We see the issue in all our Intel based Linux servers. Thanks Suresh On 21 April 2015 at 12:41, Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca> wrote: > Still can't reproduce. What OS and compiler version? > > Jean-Marc > > On 21/04/15 02:48 AM, Suresh Thiriveedi
2015 Apr 21
2
Availability of the 1.1.1 stable version
Hi, There is no change in the compiler flags. I'm using as it is from the original code. No change in the Makefile and I believe it is using the floating point only by default. We are using 8k samples and mono so the commands is as follows. [root at MEDIA opus-1.1]# ./opus_demo -d 8000 1 opus_encoded_crash.opus opus_encoded_crash.pcm *And segmentation is as below..*. ............ Calling
2015 Apr 13
2
Availability of the 1.1.1 stable version
Hi Jean-Marc, Thanks for your response. Please find the details as below. *Backtrace we got for this crash:* #0 0x0000000000800c54 in opus_decode_frame (st=0x38906b8f99d09c5, data=0xf0aa10b4ef1008ae <Address 0xf0aa10b4ef1008ae out of bounds>, len=-188613428, pcm=0x6e80016085efd57, frame_size=44037315, decode_fec=58716895) at src/opus_decoder.c:384 #1 0x00000000008009c0 in
2010 Jul 18
2
Namibia becoming NA
I have a data file in which one of the columns is country code and NA is the code for Namibia. When I read the data file using read.csv, NA for Namibia is being treated as null or "NA" How can I prevent this from happening? I tried the following but it didn't work input <- read.csv("padded.csv",header = TRUE,as.is = c("code2")) thanks, Suresh [[alternative
2000 Jun 26
4
connecting to network remotely with pppd
Does anyone have any tips on getting hooked up to a local network from win95 client through a linux ppp server? I'm close to getting it working. I've logged on remotely and can ping or telnet to the linux ppp server but I cannot ping to any other machine on the local network. Do I need to add some route commands? This is what my routing table looks like after my ppp connection is started.
2015 Apr 20
1
Availability of the 1.1.1 stable version
Hi, We are able to reproduce the issue with the 1.1 opus_demo (sample file). We captured the frames in our server just before the opus_decode and fed the file to opus_demo (1.1) and it is crashing. Same file is tested with 1.1.1 and it is fine. So this is in line with our server testing observation and I think here we can conclude that the 1.1 library is crashing while handling a specific mode
2011 Jun 16
2
[LLVMdev] Loop Unroll Factor
Dear all, What is the default loop-unroll factor in llvm? How can we specify our own unroll-factor? -Suresh