similar to: [LLVMdev] objc frontend

Is there an llvm objc frontend we can play with? If none then is there being written now? -- SMS Global Ltd Short Message Service For Seafarers -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20051213/c9765598/attachment.html>

On 4/16/06, Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: > > I've put the pre-release tar balls here: > http://llvm.org/prereleases/1.7/ > The build failed on i686-pc-linux-gnu. llvm[2]: Flexing FileLexer.l llvm[2]: Compiling FileLexer.cpp for Release build /home/rogelio/Desktop/llvm/utils/TableGen/FileLexer.l: In function 'int Filelex()':

Is it possible to build the llvm runtime without building llvm-gcc/g++? -- www.smsglobal.net SMS Global Ltd Short Message Service For Seafarers

On 4/19/06, Patrick Meredith <pmeredit at uiuc.edu> wrote: > I haven't seen anyone claim x86 linux objdir == srcdir, so I'll test it out. > Missed the 18th,but I'll try to have it done asap. > > > On Apr 18, 2006, at 2:51 PM, Robert L. Bocchino Jr. wrote: > I'll test on Darwin/PPC, precompiled llvmgcc, objdir == srcdir. > > Rob > Sorry for being

is it ok to have the same install directory for the llvm tools and llvm-gcc? -- www.smsglobal.net SMS Global Ltd Short Message Service For Seafarers

On 4/19/06, Rogelio Serrano <rogelio.serrano at gmail.com> wrote: > On 4/16/06, Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: > > > > I've put the pre-release tar balls here: > > http://llvm.org/prereleases/1.7/ > > > > The build failed on i686-pc-linux-gnu. > > llvm[2]: Flexing FileLexer.l > llvm[2]: Compiling FileLexer.cpp for Release build

How does the cfrontend generate llvm ir? by adding an llvm ir backend to gcc or modifying the gcc c frontend? -- www.smsglobal.net SMS Global Ltd Short Message Service For Seafarers

I've put the pre-release tar balls here: http://llvm.org/prereleases/1.7/ I'm asking for help to test this release and to review documentation. If anyone can spare some time to help out, I would really appreciate it. The more people that test, the better this release will be. Secondly, now that the tarballs have been created, everyone is free to check in documentation changes into the

Rogelio Serrano wrote: > is it ok to have the same install directory for the llvm tools and llvm-gcc? Yes. I don't see why it wouldn't work. -- John T. > > -- > www.smsglobal.net SMS Global Ltd Short Message Service For Seafarers > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu

Hi, I just saw this thread. I work on llvm at Xilinx but I do not work on microblaze. I will check to see if there is any interest here at Xilinx to contribute resources to the maintenance of this backend. Thanks, Jeff On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 7:38 PM, Rogelio Serrano <rogelio.serrano at gmail.com>wrote: > > On Feb 6, 2013 4:52 AM, "Chandler Carruth" <chandlerc at

Hi jeff! Any news? On Feb 9, 2013 1:53 AM, "Jeff Fifield" <fifield at mtnhigh.net> wrote: > Hi, > > I just saw this thread. I work on llvm at Xilinx but I do not work on > microblaze. > > I will check to see if there is any interest here at Xilinx to contribute > resources to the maintenance of this backend. > > Thanks, > Jeff > > > > On

Im using snapshot 0.81. make[1]: Entering directory `/home/rogelio/src/klibc-0.81/klibc' gcc -Wp,-MD,./.getenvtest.d -march=i386 -Os -falign-functions=0 -falign-jumps=0 -falign-loops=0 -nostdinc -iwithprefix include -I../klibc -I../klibc/arch/i386/include -I../klibc/include/bits32 -D__KLIBC__ -DBITSIZE=32 -I../klibc/include -I../linux/include -W -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings

On Feb 6, 2013 4:52 AM, "Chandler Carruth" <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote: > > The MBlaze backend seems to be essentially unmaintained since 2011. The maintainer (Wesley Peck who is BCC'ed) seems to have vanished, and in fact all emails to him are bouncing. > > I propose to remove the MBlaze backend on Friday if none step forward as a maintainer. Currently, folks

I tried building with linux-2.6.0-test7 build dies with: make[1]: Entering directory `/home/rogelio/src/klibc-0.80/klibc' gcc -Wp,-MD,./.fork.d -march=i386 -Os -fomit-frame-pointer -malign-functions=0 -malign-jumps=0 -malign-loops=0 -nostdinc -iwithprefix include -I../klibc -I../klibc/arch/i386/include -I../klibc/include/bits32 -D__KLIBC__ -DBITSIZE=32 -I../klibc/include

Hi , One of the things I am working on requires me to have a kernel and an initrd (as root filesystem , based on busybox) in one single image. I am trying to use initramfs for this, but there are a few things that I just can't figure out. As a test, I made a cpio archive of my own for the kernel source (plain 2.6.0-test5). Everything gets unpacked just fine during boot. Somehow I was

I''m trying to emulate the mongrel_cluster_ctl but it takes a -c conf_file option... meaning I can run it from anywhere as long as I tell it where the conf file is. Merb doesn''t have that capability does it? (it has an additional/supplemental config like mup.conf etc) Do I have to be under the merb_app root /path/to/merb/app/ to be able to run merb? Let me know. Thanks,

I''m having an issue with ARsessions... I have a rails app AND a merb app both under the same domain... I have redirects working for this to be seamless... however, the session started on merb is different than the session started in the rails app... like so.. http://pastie.caboo.se/private/r1ar42qiaekrqjdt6y Any ideas why? The only difference I see, but dunno where to change this, is

What is the best way to upgrade to Python 2.6 from the default Python 2.4. I'm running CentOS 5 --> Linux mybox.domain.com 2.6.18-238.9.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Apr 12 18:10:13 EDT 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux I've read these horror stories online and don't want to break yum.

Someone told me that if you have a CentOS or Fedora server, you can pay a Red Hat yearly fee and get them to support it (because the environments are so similar). Can anyone here substantiate this claim? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20091211/03c9856b/attachment.html>

The MBlaze backend seems to be essentially unmaintained since 2011. The maintainer (Wesley Peck who is BCC'ed) seems to have vanished, and in fact all emails to him are bouncing. I propose to remove the MBlaze backend on Friday if none step forward as a maintainer. Currently, folks are having to keep it up to date when changing shared parts of the backend with no help. -Chandler