similar to: [LLVMdev] building LLVM 1.6 on Debian unstable ...

Sameer D. Sahasrabuddhe wrote: > Hi, > > Tried to build the 1.6 release on Debian unstable, but ran into link > problems for some utils ... > > Copying the messages when building llc, the same error occurs for lli, > llvm-db and some of the examples. Is this a problem with the compiler > version? LLVMSelectionDAG.o itself builds correctly. > > make[2]: Entering

Marco Matthies wrote: >> make[2]: Entering directory `/home/sameerds/data/llvm-1.6/tools/llc' >> llvm[2]: Linking Debug executable llc >> `.gnu.linkonce.t._ZNK4llvm14TargetLowering12getValueTypeEPKNS_4TypeE' >> referenced >> in section `.rodata' of >> /home/sameerds/data/llvm-1.6/Debug/lib/LLVMSelectionDAG >> .o: defined in discarded

Chris Lattner wrote: >> I tried generating the docs myself ... doxygen simply refuses to >> create pages for classes defined in anonymous namespaces in cpp files. >> I enabled options such as EXTRACT_ALL, EXTRACT_PRIVATE and >> EXTRACT_LOCAL, but no luck. How is the publicly available >> documentation generated? > > They are generated from the Makefile in

Hi, The docs available on illuvium.com are different from the one's present in the doxygen tarball on the same page ... can the tarball be generated from the same docs as the browseable version? I considered crawling the illuvium.com site, but it would be better to simply have a tarball available. I tried generating the docs myself ... doxygen simply refuses to create pages for classes

Just noticed that quite a few passes like LoopSimplify are implemented in a single .cpp file ... this makes it impossible to specify LoopSimplify using the "addRequired" method. Was there any particular reason to do it this way? I wouldn't mind doing the splitting myself, though I am not using the CVS versions right now. Also, it would be nice to have support for some sort of a

On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 08:10:17AM -0500, Chris Lattner wrote: > AU.addRequiredID(LoopSimplifyID); > > "LoopSimplifyID" is a marker that is used to identify the pass, which is > exported from the .cpp file. I'll have to declare a PassInfo* called LoopSimplifyID inside namespace llvm, in order for that to compile correctly, right? I was wondering why not simply

I want to create a simple map from a Value to the instruction that defines it. Such a map is present inside SchedGraph, but I need it in a much simpler context. If I got it right, I create a new AnalysisGroup, and write a pass that implements it. What kind of pass should I derive it from? The mapping only makes sense within a function, so FunctionPass seems to be the right choice ... is that

Recently wrote a pass that inserts a preheader for a loop that doesn't have one. When I tried to run it, I ran into a problem that became obvious in hindsight - the PHINodes need to be updated in places where the incoming control-edge has changed. Is there anything else that can be affected when a block is inserted into the CFG? Also, planning to write a helper function which will take care

Hello, Chuck. You wrote Tuesday, May 16, 2006, 6:03:14 PM: C> /netrel/src/binutils-20050610-1/bfd/cofflink.c:1926 C> make[2]: *** I've tracked this assertion some more deep. The problem is in LLVMSelectionDAG.o file. If I run the next lines, I've got and assertion: ld -r -o LLVMSelectionDAG.o ScheduleDAGList.o ScheduleDAGRRList.o ld -o llc LLVMSelectionDAG.o If I remove one of

On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 11:35:30AM -0600, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Sat, 2 Apr 2005, Sameer D. Sahasrabuddhe wrote: > > I want to create a simple map from a Value to the instruction that > > defines it. Such a map is present inside SchedGraph, but I need it in > > a much simpler context. > > Is this in the context of the code generator? No ... I am just trying to feel

On Tue, 21 Mar 2006, Reid Spencer wrote: > About the only thing I can suggest are: > > 1. Combine LLVMSparc*.o into one LLVMSparc.a. That work is already > happening with the new Sparc backend that is being developed. Should be > out in 1.7 (Chris?) I wouldn't worry about the SparcV9 backend for your project. > 2. Combine the JIT/Interpreter/ExecutionEngine into one .a

On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, Sameer D. Sahasrabuddhe wrote: > The docs available on illuvium.com are different from the one's present in > the doxygen tarball on the same page ... can the tarball be generated from > the same docs as the browseable version? I considered crawling the > illuvium.com site, but it would be better to simply have a tarball available. Agreed. I have been

Reid added some nice inter-library dependency data to utils/llvm- config/LibDeps.txt. There are three sets of circular dependencies between LLVM libraries. If you use any library from one of these sets, you may need to pull in the rest: LLVMCodeGen.o LLVMSelectionDAG.o libLLVMAnalysis.a libLLVMTarget.a libLLVMTransformUtils.a libLLVMipa.a LLVMSparcV9.o LLVMSparcV9InstrSched.o

Simon Burton <simon at arrowtheory.com> writes: >> There are several possibilities here: either add1 is assigned a NULL >> pointer, or LLVM was unable to use the JIT and generates bytecode >> instead of native code, or invalid native code was generated >> (unlikely). > > Well, it's not NULL: > > (gdb) print add1 > $1 = (int (*)(int)) 0x83e43b8 >

Hi, Looking into LLVM for a database query engine project... After downloading the latest source from CVS, it's my first time trying to build LLVM. Following the "Getting Started" instructions, all went well until gmake reported this error while trying to link llc: In function `(anonymous namespace)::BreakCriticalEdges::getAnalysisUsage(llvm::AnalysisUsage&) const':

I ran with VERBOSE=1 and see: g++ -I/home/neale/LLVM/llvm/include -I/home/neale/LLVM/llvm/tools/llc -D_DEBUG -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -g -fno-exceptions -fPIC -Woverloaded-virtual -pedantic -Wall -W -Wwrite-strings -Wno-long-long -Wunused -Wno-unused-parameter -g -Wl,-R -Wl,/home/neale/LLVM/llvm/Debug/bin -Wl,-export-dynamic

Hi Eric, Its definitely amusing :) About the only thing I can suggest are: 1. Combine LLVMSparc*.o into one LLVMSparc.a. That work is already happening with the new Sparc backend that is being developed. Should be out in 1.7 (Chris?) 2. Combine the JIT/Interpreter/ExecutionEngine into one .a I don't know enough about the codegen/target/analysis/ipa stuff to be able to make any

I constructed an LLVM 2.7 VS solution with cmake, but it has 66 projects: ALL_BUILD, ".\ALL_BUILD.vcproj" BrainF, "examples\BrainF\BrainF.vcproj" Fibonacci, "examples\Fibonacci\Fibonacci.vcproj" FileCheck, "utils\FileCheck\FileCheck.vcproj" HowToUseJIT,

On Fri, 14 Apr 2006 03:25:39 +0200 Oscar Fuentes <oscarfv at telefonica.net> wrote: ... > Simon, > > With a fresh CVS checkout, I've tried your test case on Windows/VC++ > and it works ok. Too bad that I have not access to a Linux machine > right now. I'll like to see what's wrong with your test case. > > What you get from running the test case under gdb

On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 11:22:26PM -0500, Chris Lattner wrote: > BasicBlock *SplitBlockPredecessors(BasicBlock *BB, const char *Suffix, > const std::vector<BasicBlock*> &Preds); > > Basically, given a BB with multiple predecessors, it inserts (and returns) > a new block, moving the predecessors in Preds to the new block and leaving