Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Vector LLVM checked in!"
2006 May 10
1
[LLVMdev] Re: LLVMdev Digest, Vol 16, Issue 14
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 15:20:29 -0500
> From: "Robert L. Bocchino Jr." <bocchino at uiuc.edu>
> Subject: [LLVMdev] Vector LLVM checked in!
> To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>
> Message-ID: <64dde68b5934d83056aeb3c9f66afe7e at uiuc.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain;
2006 Sep 13
2
[LLVMdev] Installing binary gcc-4.0 frontend on x86-linux: where is llvm-gcc?
Hi all,
I recently downloaded the gcc 4 frontend from:
http://llvm.org/releases/1.8/llvm-gcc4-1.8-x86-linux.tar.gz
I checked out the source from CVS using:
cvs -d :pserver:anon at llvm.org:/var/cvs/llvm login
cvs -z3 -d :pserver:anon at llvm.org:/var/cvs/llvm co llvm
Running the configure script fails to find llvm-gcc. Inspecting
the untarred frontend, it doesn't contain any such binary,
2005 Oct 18
3
[LLVMdev] Internalize or build broken?
Hi,
I just updated my tree, and when I do a clean rebuild, I get errors
like this:
WARNING: Internalize couldn't load file '/comp_genericeh.lst'!
WARNING: Internalize couldn't load file '/comp_main.lst'!
WARNING: Internalize couldn't load file '/comp_sjljeh.lst'!
WARNING: Internalize couldn't load file '/../gc_exported_symbols.lst'!
It looks like
2008 Jul 07
0
[LLVMdev] Trying to compile llvm-gcc to mips
And one last thing, the problem seems to be related to libcpp. Using only C
frontend will work?
2008/7/7 Julio <julio.martin.hidalgo at gmail.com>:
> Hi, well, I downloaded the head revision of llvm and llvm-gcc. As you said
> it hangs at:
>
> Formal argument #0 has unhandled type f32
> /home/julio/trunk/llvm-gcc/gcc/libgcc2.c:1765: internal compiler error:
> Abortado
2008 Jul 07
3
[LLVMdev] Trying to compile llvm-gcc to mips
Hi, well, I downloaded the head revision of llvm and llvm-gcc. As you said
it hangs at:
Formal argument #0 has unhandled type f32
/home/julio/trunk/llvm-gcc/gcc/libgcc2.c:1765: internal compiler error:
Abortado
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Actually, I don't need fp, there is any way to disable?
By the way, I'm working with a MIPS coprocessor
2008 Jul 07
2
[LLVMdev] Trying to compile llvm-gcc to mips
Hi Julio,
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:53 AM, Julio <julio.martin.hidalgo at gmail.com> wrote:
> And one last thing, the problem seems to be related to libcpp. Using only C
> frontend will work?
The problem is with libgcc2, which contains libcalls needed to support
some operations
your processor cant directly do.
>> Actually, I don't need fp, there is any way to disable?
2007 Feb 06
1
[LLVMdev] llvm-poolalloc compilation failed
Chris,
I performed the steps you gave below to check out llvm-poolalloc. When
I want to get new updates made to llvm-poolalloc, do I perform the
following commands?
cvs -d :pserver:anon at llvm.org:/var/cvs/llvm login
<Hit return for an empty password>
cd llvm/projects
cvs -d :pserver:anon at llvm.org:/var/cvs/llvm update -r release_19
llvm-poolalloc
In other words, do I specify the
2006 Apr 07
0
[LLVMdev] CVS Broken?
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Robert L. Bocchino Jr. wrote:
> I did a utils/cvsupdate, and there are no conflicts. srcdir != objdir. This
> is on persephone.
>
> Are you not getting this error? Perhaps I should check out a fresh tree and
> try to compile it?
Nope, I don't think anyone else is getting this error. If you could try a
fresh build that would be great, I'll fire
2006 Apr 07
0
[LLVMdev] CVS Broken?
I'm guessing the problem occurred because I hadn't updated in a while
(maybe a couple of weeks?) and I had an old Intrinsics.gen file
hanging around in my source directory that was getting picked up by
the makefile for some reason. This is a bug, but maybe it's harmless
because there's a onetime workaround (delete the file by hand) and it
won't be a problem for
2005 Jan 25
0
lots of changes in cvs
Hi all,
I''ve been spending a lot of time over the past few weeks on RubyTorrent.
All the changes are in CVS. Highlights are:
- Transfer speeds should be much better, thanks to a better piece
selection algorithm, and being more aggressive about dropping boring
peers and adding new ones,
- Download/upload rate limits now work.
- Many bugs fixed.
- .torrent creation now
2007 Jan 24
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-poolalloc compilation failed
Vikram S. Adve wrote:
> This kind of regression is a fallout of having some code live in
> separate CVS modules as "projects." It would help to have someone
> volunteer to maintain each project, which can be as little as making
> sure it continues to compile or as much as supporting it with answers
> to questions and bug fixes. Here is the current list of projects:
2006 Apr 07
2
[LLVMdev] CVS Broken?
I did a utils/cvsupdate, and there are no conflicts. srcdir !=
objdir. This is on persephone.
Are you not getting this error? Perhaps I should check out a fresh
tree and try to compile it?
Rob
On Apr 7, 2006, at 11:40 AM, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Robert L. Bocchino Jr. wrote:
>> I just updated from CVS, and after doing a clean rebuild I get
>> this
2006 Apr 07
0
[LLVMdev] CVS Broken?
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Robert L. Bocchino Jr. wrote:
> I just updated from CVS, and after doing a clean rebuild I get this error:
Are you sure that no conflicts prevented updating from going smoothly? How
are you building (srcdir ==/!= objdir)?
-Chris
> /Users/bocchino/llvm-checkin/src/include/llvm/IntrinsicInst.h: In static
> member function 'static bool
2005 Nov 02
3
[LLVMdev] LLVM 1.6 Release Branch
Dear All,
I've created the LLVM release branch (CVS tag release_16).
Those developers wanting to commit changes to LLVM without having your
changes go into LLVM 1.6 can now commit to CVS mainline to your heart's
content.
:)
TESTING:
--------
1. I'm still looking for volunteers to test MacOS X and Solaris. If
you'd like to volunteer, please email the list to let us know.
2006 Apr 07
2
[LLVMdev] CVS Broken?
OK, when I copy $(SRCDIR)/include/llvm/Intrinsics.gen to $(OBJDIR)/
include/llvm/ by hand after building (and failing) once, the build
succeeds. This is definitely a makefile bug.
Rob
On Apr 7, 2006, at 11:40 AM, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Robert L. Bocchino Jr. wrote:
>> I just updated from CVS, and after doing a clean rebuild I get
>> this error:
>
>
2006 Apr 07
2
[LLVMdev] CVS Broken?
I've done several CVS head builds today .. no problems on Linux.
Reid.
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 11:53 -0500, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Robert L. Bocchino Jr. wrote:
>
> > I did a utils/cvsupdate, and there are no conflicts. srcdir != objdir. This
> > is on persephone.
> >
> > Are you not getting this error? Perhaps I should check out a fresh
2006 Apr 07
3
[LLVMdev] CVS Broken?
I just updated from CVS, and after doing a clean rebuild I get this
error:
/Users/bocchino/llvm-checkin/src/include/llvm/IntrinsicInst.h: In
static member function 'static bool llvm::DbgInfoIntrinsic::classof
(const llvm::IntrinsicInst*)':
/Users/bocchino/llvm-checkin/src/include/llvm/IntrinsicInst.h:77:
error: 'dbg_declare' is not a member of 'llvm::Intrinsic'
2006 Aug 06
2
[LLVMdev] Could not access CVS for llvm
I tried to access the latest LLVM, since several messages here so far have
referred me to it. Now I have no experience with CVS-over-the-net. My
previous experiences with versoin control have been RCS and Monotone.
Brief summary:
hendrik at lovesong:~/dv$ mkdir llvm
hendrik at lovesong:~/dv$ cd llvm
hendrik at lovesong:~/dv/llvm$ cvs -d :pserver:anon at llvm.org:/var/cvs/llvm login
Logging in
2006 Aug 07
0
[LLVMdev] Could not access CVS for llvm
Hendrik Boom wrote:
> I tried to access the latest LLVM, since several messages here so far have
> referred me to it. Now I have no experience with CVS-over-the-net. My
> previous experiences with versoin control have been RCS and Monotone.
>
> Brief summary:
>
> hendrik at lovesong:~/dv$ mkdir llvm
> hendrik at lovesong:~/dv$ cd llvm
> hendrik at lovesong:~/dv/llvm$
2006 Aug 07
0
[LLVMdev] Re: Could not access CVS for llvm
On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 09:26:07 -0700, Reid Spencer wrote:
> Hendrik,
>
> You could also just "touch ~/.cvspass" to create the file which should
> eliminate the warning. However, since you did a login, and it seemed
> successful, chances are the file now exists (containing the blank
> password for anon at llvm.org).
Indeed, the file is there.
>
> Reid.
>