similar to: [LLVMdev] Next LLVM release thoughts?

I agree with all the reasons others have cited for continuing to have regular releases: it's a catalyst for many things including getting users to update their code, distribution mangers to update distros, getting "nearly-done" pieces wrapped up, and lurking problems identified and fixed. In addition, it's a good excuse to spam a few lists with the announcement.

Hello Chris, Chris Lattner wrote on 11/10/2005 at 6:44 p.m.: > It has been entirely too long since the last release, and we have > plenty of goodies for a very solid release. Do people find releases > useful, or should we just continue to run out of CVS? Does anyone > have any thoughts? Yeah, I think so :) Also, it would be really nice if an official cygwin build (the binary) was

Spamming lists is probably the best reason to keep releases going. It's a great way to find new users :) By the way, are any distributions currently carrying LLVM? I couldn't find it in the Debian repositories. -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Vikram S. Adve Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 10:36 AM To:

Frequently releasing software can be a good thing. Especially when it gets to a point where you have a stable CVS version and many new features/bug fixes. -bw On 10/11/05, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > > Hi All, > > It has been entirely too long since the last release, and we have plenty > of goodies for a very solid release. Do people find releases useful,

As I'm not particularly active with LLVM right now, it doesn't make any difference to me, personally. However, I am a strong advocate for "release early, release often". We had previously agreed to releases 4 times per year. This will be the 3rd and final one this year. Many users of LLVM only work from release to release so it is unfair to them to let them stray very far

> Also, it would be really nice if an official > cygwin build (the binary) was published too. I spent quite a bit of > time screwing with it a few months ago, and it was quite a bastard to > get going... I had quite a time with it too, could only get the debug version to build as there seemed to be an internal problem with ld. I would very interested in how you got it running and

The automated tests seems not run periodically. Some builds are even broken (http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/testresults/X86-niobe/), and some failed (http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/testresults/SparcV9/). Will there be another automated test be scheduled before the next release? On 11/10/05, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote: > Frequently releasing software can be a good thing. Especially

Than my question is this? Now that I have switchtowerized and migrate enabled my app I can start down a new path if need be on a different OS as the base of the system. We have already tried CentOS and found it to have more issues than those mentioned about fedora and through it away faster than one could shake a stick at. Here are our requirements for a stage/dev box and production:

Hello Aaron, Aaron Gray wrote on 14/10/2005 at 5:50 a.m.: >> Also, it would be really nice if an official cygwin build (the >> binary) was published too. I spent quite a bit of time screwing >> with it a few months ago, and it was quite a bastard to get >> going... > I had quite a time with it too, could only get the debug version to > build as there seemed to be an

Hello Aaron, Aaron Gray wrote on 14/10/2005 at 10:22 a.m.: > I am not sure but it looks like a problem with your Cygwin > instillation ? Try a 'make configure' or 'make reconfigure'. Hmmm, I was able to build llvm/tools-only.... As for "make configure" - that didn't help. > Here's a link to the instructions I developed for building LLVM on > Cygwin

Oleg, > - llvm/make tools-only worked ok Good. > - llvm-gcc/make all failed with the following message (2nd try): > make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/oleg.smolsky/llvm-gcc-build/gcc' > make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/oleg.smolsky/llvm-gcc-build/gcc' > Checking multilib configuration... > multilib.out is unchanged > Configuring in i686-pc-cygwin/libstdc++-v3 >

On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 08:13:21AM +0200, Alex Vinokur wrote: > Thank you for that information. I will wait until you get Cygwin > issues figured out. How can I know of that? Check out the link to the Cygwin nightly tester results here: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/testresults/ Wait until most of the asterisks in the test results go away. :) The tester runs nightly, so checking every few

On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Vikram Adve wrote: > ... you would relax that policy for cases where the pass wants > control over its order of visitation. In fact , some passes (e.g., > loop tiling) may want to do two or more transforms on a set of loops > at a time. E.g., loop tiling needs to do strip-mining on a loop, > then interchange one of the resulting loops with *some* outer loop

Does anyone know if the E1 cards that digium sells work in India. Also are there any distributers for those cards in India. By E1 cards I mean E100P, TE410P or TE405P -- regards Vikram (http://www.vicramresearch.com)

How big was that log file? If we are running close to the limit, I can just buy a new disk for zion. Other suggestions welcome. --Vikram On Nov 25, 2006, at 12:38 AM, John T. Criswell wrote: > Reid Spencer wrote: > > 1) It appears that the only problem was with sending email to the > llvm-commits list; any files commited to the repository should be > commited. > >

On Fri, 14 Oct 2005, Oleg Smolsky wrote: > Hello Aaron, > Aaron Gray wrote on 14/10/2005 at 10:22 a.m.: >> I am not sure but it looks like a problem with your Cygwin >> instillation ? Try a 'make configure' or 'make reconfigure'. > Hmmm, I was able to build llvm/tools-only.... As for "make configure" - > that didn't help. > >>

Remove our (soon to be) bouncing email addresses, and update Dmitri's address. Dmitry will take over as maintainer for CAIF from now on. Cc: Vikram Arv <vikram.arv at stericsson.com> Cc: Dmitry Tarnyagin <dmitry.tarnyagin at stericsson.com> Cc: Dmitry Tarnyagin <dmitry.tarnyagin at lockless.no> Signed-off-by: Sjur Br?ndeland <sjur.brandeland at stericsson.com> ---

Remove our (soon to be) bouncing email addresses, and update Dmitri's address. Dmitry will take over as maintainer for CAIF from now on. Cc: Vikram Arv <vikram.arv at stericsson.com> Cc: Dmitry Tarnyagin <dmitry.tarnyagin at stericsson.com> Cc: Dmitry Tarnyagin <dmitry.tarnyagin at lockless.no> Signed-off-by: Sjur Br?ndeland <sjur.brandeland at stericsson.com> ---

Hello, I am a R beginner and hoping to obtain some hints or suggestions about using permutations to sort a data set I have. Here is an example dataset: Ind1 11 00 12 15 28 Ind2 21 33 22 67 52 Ind3 22 45 21 22 56 Ind4 11 25 74 77 42 Ind5 41 32 67 45 22 This will be read into a variable using read.table. What I want to do is permute these individuals and every

Misha Brukman wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 08:13:21AM +0200, Alex Vinokur wrote: > > Thank you for that information. I will wait until you get Cygwin > > issues figured out. How can I know of that? > > Check out the link to the Cygwin nightly tester results here: > > http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/testresults/ > > Wait until most of the asterisks in the