similar to: [LLVMdev] Missing STL include in CVS prevent compilation on vc++.

Hi Ashok, I created a new Ubuntu 12.04 virtual machine and followed directions except that I know use your cmake command instead of configure, and I got the error below. Any help is very much appreciated. $ /home/ubuntu/bin/bin/clang++ -I /home/ubuntu/bin/include/ tutorial1.cpp In file included from tutorial1.cpp:5: In file included from /home/ubuntu/bin/include/llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h:17:

Hi folks, This applies to src/share/man/man5/moduli.5 in the OpenBSD source tree, and doesn't seem to apply to the portable OpenSSH, so I've sent this change here instead of via Bugzilla. The wording of moduli(5) implies that sshd puts more thought about which modulus it selects than it really does. The following patch corrects this. Simon. -- Simon Burge

Add -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS to your compilation flag. On 7/10/2012 11:23 AM, NY Knicks Fan wrote: > Hi Ashok, > > I created a new Ubuntu 12.04 virtual machine and followed directions > except that I know use your cmake command instead of configure, and I > got the error below. > > Any help is very much appreciated. > > > $

Dear All, In the last few days I started using the last version of R as I encountered a problem with R1.9 and the use of RWinEdt, however the problem shows with R2.01 as well. More precisely 1. I install R2.01 after removing old verions of R 2. I Install RWinEdt package versione RWinEdt_1.6-2 and SWinRegistry_0.3-2 and everything seems fine 3. I recall the RWinEdt library (library(RWinEdt)) and

OK.  Thanks.  I now get the following error (which appears to be a problem w/ the tutorial itself?): $ /home/ubuntu/bin/bin/clang++ -I /home/ubuntu/bin/include/  -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS tutorial1.cpp/tmp/tutorial1-LQ71fW.o: In function `main': tutorial1.cpp:(.text+0x42): undefined reference to `llvm::outs()' tutorial1.cpp:(.text+0x72): undefined reference to

>From: "Baptiste Lepilleur" >Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 09:29:07 +0200 > >Henrik Bach wrote: >>Hi, >> >>Please have a look on my private Getting started with MinGW: >> >>http://www.geocities.com/henrik_bach_llvm/ > > >Thanks Henrik.The make line was most useful. Though, in my case I also >needed to add a -L so libimagehlp.a would be

Hi all, The DAGCombiner pass actually runs even if the optimize level is set to None. This can result in incorrect debug information or unexpected stepping/debugging experience. Not to mention that having good stepping/debugging experience is the major reason to compile at /O0. I recently suggested a patch to disable one specific DAG combine at /O0 that broke stepping on a particular case

Hi Scott, I'm not clear on what you're saying here; some of your points below seem to be contradictory. The advice to use target-independent nodes when feasible seems sound to me, so I wrote up a comment about it in SelectionDAGNodes.h. If you can formulate your thoughts in the form of specific documentation changes, that would be helpful. In theory, DAGCombiner is supposed to check if

Hello, it looks like I do have infinite loop in llc on linux/armv7 platform somewhere in llvm::SmallVectorImpl. Two backtraces obtained with 10 seconds delay are: 0x0099be14 in llvm::SmallVectorTemplateCommon<llvm::SDNode*>::setEnd (this=0x7ee90b38, P=0x5c06988) at /export/home/karel/vcs/llvm-head/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:103 103 void setEnd(T *P) { this->EndX = P; }

Martin: It sounds like you are doing is more akin to shuffle selection than fusion and therefore it's a better fit for instruction selection than DAGCombining. Try movign it to <Target>ISelDAGToDAG's Select (or potentially PreprocessISelDAG). Th -Nirav On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 4:05 PM Martin J. O'Riordan <MartinO at theheart.ie> wrote: > We discovered what is

We discovered what is happening. SDAGCombiner essentially looks at various combinations of nodes to do with vectors, and when it can, it creates a vector shuffle. The problem is, that our vector shuffle lowering builds new trees with vector element, or vector sub-vector insert sequences. The generic DAGCombiner, reconstructs these into a new shuffle, and so the loop continues - we reduce it,

Hi, This is probably really simple, but I am clearly not R-minded, I have read the help files, and reread them, and I still can't work out what to do... I have a data frame (d) with 3 columns (age (0-5), quarter (1-4) and x). I want to estimate the precision of my mean x by age and quarter, so I want to carry out a bootstrap for each group. I am trying to do this within a loop, so I don't

I agree, that doesn't look right. It looks like this is what was intended: Index: lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp =================================================================== --- lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp (revision 65000) +++ lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp (working copy) @@ -4903,9 +4903,9 @@ // resultant store does not need a higher alignment than

Hi Gabrielle, > > Historically nodes marked "custom" were considered legal, so the > > DAGCombiner would have been correct to generate it. Not sure how > > that ever worked though. I think Dan split the isOperationLegal > > method into isOperationLegal and isOperationLegalOrCustom for reasons > > related to this kind of thing. I don't know whether

Hi Gabriele, > In the combine 2 step (after legalization), in the DAGCombiner::visitBIT_CONVERT() method, the DAG combiner is replacing an FABS followed by a BIT_CONVERT, to a BIT_CONVERT followed by an AND 0x7FFFFFFFFFFFFFFF. Everything is 64 bit. > On my target, FABS and BIT_CONVERT are legal in 64 bit, but AND in not legal in 64 bit (is declared custom). So the dag combiner is

Yes, it was I who put that rant in the commit log and it's justified. Worse, it's unreasonable to actually go through all of DAGCombiner's code and check to see if certain kinds of constants, e.g., i64, are legal during a particular phase of DAGCombiner. DAGCombiner does good work and the backends are supposed to be good citizens. CellSPU is certainly trying to be a good citizen, no

This is needed for my native linker patch that is coming soon. As discussed on IRC: Index: lib/Bytecode/Archive/ArchiveReader.cpp =================================================================== RCS file: /var/cvs/llvm/llvm/lib/Bytecode/Archive/ArchiveReader.cpp,v retrieving revision 1.38 diff -u -r1.38 ArchiveReader.cpp --- lib/Bytecode/Archive/ArchiveReader.cpp 29 Dec 2004 01:20:24

Reid Spencer wrote: > Hi Baptiste, > > On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 09:44 +0100, Baptiste Lepilleur wrote: >> I just want to make sure I understand the semantic of the icmp >> function correctly as assumption are dangerous in this domain. >> >> The syntax is specified as follow: >> <result> = icmp <cond> <ty> <var1>, <var2> ; yields

On Mar 29, 2010, at 6:50 AM, Kalle Raiskila wrote: > attached is a second try for the bigstack patch for SPU, with testcase. It is essentially the patch committed as 97091, and reverted as 97099, but with the following additions: > -in vararg handling, registers are marked to be live, to not confuse the register scavenger Looks good. You can try running with -verify-machineinstrs to detect

You will need to link to the LLVM/clang libraries. To get the correct flags, you can run: ./llvm-config --ldflags --libs and use the flags reported. On 7/10/2012 11:35 AM, NY Knicks Fan wrote: > OK. Thanks. I now get the following error (which appears to be a > problem w/ the tutorial itself?): > > $ /home/ubuntu/bin/bin/clang++ -I /home/ubuntu/bin/include/ >