similar to: [LLVMdev] LiveIntervals, replace register with representative register?

On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 15:09 +0800, Tzu-Chien Chiu wrote: > I don't understand the following code snippet in LiveIntervalAnalysis.cpp. > > Why changing the type of the opreand from a virtual register to a > machine register? The register number (reg) is still a virtual > register index (>1024). > > > bool LiveIntervals::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &fn)

On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Tzu-Chien Chiu wrote: > I don't understand the following code snippet in LiveIntervalAnalysis.cpp. > > Why changing the type of the opreand from a virtual register to a > machine register? The register number (reg) is still a virtual > register index (>1024). This code isn't actually replacing the virtual register with a physreg. As you noticed, it

Hey, guys, could someone tell me some high level things about the version of linear scan that you use? 1) The heuristics for spilling seems to be: (mop.isUse() + mop.isDef()) * pow(10.0F, (int)loopDepth besides not spilling defs that are immediatly followed by uses, do you do any other thing, such as, taking into consideration the size of the interval when spilling? 2) How do you

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, David Greene wrote: >> As I work toward improving LLVM register allocation, I've >> come across the need to do some refactoring. > > cool. :) One request: Evan is currently out on vacation until Monday. > This is an area that he is very interested in and will want to chime in > on. Please don't start anything

On 08/09/05, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > This code isn't actually replacing the virtual register with a physreg. Then why changing its optype? It makes the assertion fails: MachineOperand& MO = inst.getOperand(n); if (MRegisterInfo::isVirtualRegister(MO.getReg())) { assert(MachineOperand::MO_VirtualRegister == MO.getType()); ... } Is that alright? Some

On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, David Greene wrote: >> Beyond that, one of the issues is the "r2rmap" and "rep" function. As >> you've noticed, the coallescer basically uses these to avoid rewriting the >> code after it does coallescing. For example, if r1024 is coallesced with >> r1026, it leaves all uses of both registers in the code, instead of >>

On Apr 12, 2007, at 2:37 PM, David Greene wrote: > Chris Lattner wrote: >> On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, David Greene wrote: >>> As I work toward improving LLVM register allocation, I've >>> come across the need to do some refactoring. Yay! >> Beyond that, one of the issues is the "r2rmap" and "rep" >> function. As >> you've

Thanks for the information. I still don't know how do I partition registers into different classes from the virtual registers? For instance, I have the function who which iterates over the instructions, but I don't know how to write the function which returns the different register class. void RAOptimal::Gather(MachineFunction &Fn) { // Gather just iterates over the blocks,

On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, David Greene wrote: > As I work toward improving LLVM register allocation, I've > come across the need to do some refactoring. cool. :) One request: Evan is currently out on vacation until Monday. This is an area that he is very interested in and will want to chime in on. Please don't start anything drastic until he gets back :). > Specifically, I would

I have 2 models: mop, has_and_belong_to_many :contacts contact, has_and_belong_to_many :mops when I save my mop Ii have the users coming in a an array: ["9",10"] I am doing this to asscociate each one to a mop: @contacts.each do |contact| @mop.contacts << contact end Contact(#44950470) expected, got String(#20837400) It is giving me the above error. Any ideas?

Hi all, As I work toward improving LLVM register allocation, I've come across the need to do some refactoring. Specifically, I would like to separate register coalescing from live interval analysis. Right now LiveIntervals handles both. The reason I want to separate them is that other types of register allocators might like to do coalescing differently (e.g. graph coloring does it by

I am considering adding a new target independent codegen-only COPY instruction to our MachineInstr representation. It would be used to replace INSERT_SUBREG, EXTRACT_SUBREG, and virtual register copies after instruction selection. Selection DAG still needs {INSERT,EXTRACT}_SUBREG, but they would not appear as MachineInstrs any longer. The COPY instruction handles subreg operations with less

Hello, since today I could not update my CentOS 5.3 system with yum cause of the following error message. # yum update [...] Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package exiv2.i386 0:0.18.2-1.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package perl-Params-Util.i386 0:1.00-1.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package perl-Moose.noarch 0:0.86-1.el5.rf set to be updated -->

On Jun 15, 2010, at 2:48 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen wrote: > I am considering adding a new target independent codegen-only COPY instruction to our MachineInstr representation. It would be used to replace INSERT_SUBREG, EXTRACT_SUBREG, and virtual register copies after instruction selection. Selection DAG still needs {INSERT,EXTRACT}_SUBREG, but they would not appear as MachineInstrs any longer.

Estimados: Tengo problemas con mi programa R. Cada vez que dejo stand-by mi compu por unos minutos, R se queda pegado, e imposibilitado de trabajar, lo que me obliga a cerrarlo y volver a abrirlo cada vez que sucede. De: Carlos Ortega [mailto:cof en qualityexcellence.es] Enviado el: miércoles, 31 de agosto de 2016 3:49 Para: javier valdes CC: Javier Valdes Cantallopts (DGA); r-help-es en

~/workspace/LLVM/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_report.cc: In function ‘const char* __tsan::ReportTypeString(__tsan::ReportType, __sanitizer::uptr)’: ~/workspace/LLVM/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_report.cc:95:41: warning: ISO C++ does not allow ?: with omitted middle operand [-Wpedantic] return GetReportHeaderFromTag(tag) ?: "race on external object";

Hola Carlos: -Mira, mi máquina es nueva, con 16 giga de memoria Ram, así que no creo que sea problema de recursos -En general me pasa esto cuando despliego un Plot. (Después que me paro y vuelvo a mi escritorio, pasado 15 min) el plot se deforma en la pantalla y después al eliminarlo se queda pegado. -Me pasa sobre Rstudio. -Windows 7 PROF. De: Carlos Ortega [mailto:cof en qualityexcellence.es]

?El considerar las horas, minutos y segundos, depende de lo que quieras hacer. - Puedes incorporarlo en el campo fecha con la función de lubridate: "ymd_hms()". - Pero luego al crear el vector de referencia para encontrar los faltantes tienes que crear un vector secuencia entre la fecha mínima y la máxima. Este vector de referencia no tiene dudas de que es entre el max y

Hola, Usé "textConnection" para poder utilizar tus propios datos y leerlos con read.table. En tu caso, si tienes los datos en un .csv, simplemente tienes que leerlos con read.table y utilizar la parte que sigue a "library(lubridate)" en el código que compartí ayer: coger la columna de fechas, leerla con "lubridate" y compararla con el vector de referencia. El error

De esa forma me sigue entregando lo mismo, multiplica las variables por dos (80 obs 26 variables) debería ser (80 obs 13 variables).En concreto pega la información pero la costado, no hacia abajo. Solucionara el tema si le agrego dos columnas ficticias para que queden todas las bases con 13 variables? Saludos. [Descripción: FIRMA2] De: Carlos Ortega [mailto:cof en qualityexcellence.es] Enviado