similar to: [LLVMdev] llc problem

On Thu, 13 Apr 2006, Reid Spencer wrote: > I just updated again (both llvm and llvm-gcc). The only thing that > changed was: > P test/Regression/CFrontend/2005-12-04-DeclarationLineNumbers.c > > The regression test below was done *with* your llvm-gcc changes to llvm- > expand.c. I don't know what the failures are all about, but I will try > it again. If its the same,

Hi, I have been trying to randomize blocks in a program and modified "BasicBlockPlacement.cpp" for the purpose but getting segmentation fault.I am not able to determine the problem.Can anyone please decrypt these error messages or suggest what might be the possible cause of failure? -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The various intrinsic assert/crashes should all be fixed on mainline CVS (they are PR733, which I just fixed). The only ones that I'm wary of are: XPASS: /proj/llvm/build/../llvm/test/Regression/CFrontend/2004-02-20- StaticRedeclare.c.tr FAIL: /proj/llvm/build/../llvm/test/Regression/CFrontend/2005-12-04- DeclarationLineNumbers.c: In the former case, I would guess that the test isn't

I just updated again (both llvm and llvm-gcc). The only thing that changed was: P test/Regression/CFrontend/2005-12-04-DeclarationLineNumbers.c The regression test below was done *with* your llvm-gcc changes to llvm- expand.c. I don't know what the failures are all about, but I will try it again. If its the same, I'll let you know. Reid. On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 16:20 -0500, Chris Lattner

1. If we run a few passes in a sequence ..is the bytecode file transformed after each pass in sequence i.e if we have a) opt -pass1 -pass2 -pass3 < in.bc > out.bc b)opt -pass1 -pass2 < in.bc > tmp.bc opt -pass3 < tmp.bc > out.bc are the above two equivalent ? what I basically want is to run my pass on an optimised bytecode , so should i optimize it and get a new bytecode

On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 23:19, Abhijit Ray wrote: > 1. If we run a few passes in a sequence ..is the bytecode file > transformed after each pass in sequence i.e > > if we have > a) opt -pass1 -pass2 -pass3 < in.bc > out.bc > b)opt -pass1 -pass2 < in.bc > tmp.bc > opt -pass3 < tmp.bc > out.bc > > are the above two equivalent ? Yes, they're

Thanks a lot for replying Chris, I m trying to randomize the blocks in a program.I generate a random number( between the current "InsertPos" and the last block), and then iterate through the list of basicblocks , picking up block with position equal to that of the random number and place it into the current InsertPos and increment InsertPos. Running it like this:

On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Tanu Sharma wrote: > I have been trying to randomize blocks in a program and modified > "BasicBlockPlacement.cpp" for the purpose but getting segmentation > fault.I am not able to determine the problem.Can anyone please decrypt > these error messages or suggest what might be the possible cause of > failure? I'd be happy to fix this, but I need

Here's what's left on Linux (GCC 4.1.0), after all updates that went into the branch: Running /proj/llvm/build/../llvm/test/Regression/CFrontend/dg.exp ... FAIL: /proj/llvm/build/../llvm/test/Regression/CFrontend/2004-02-12- LargeAggregateCopy.c.tr: gccas: /proj/llvm/build/../llvm/lib/VMCore/Function.cpp:266: unsigned int llvm::Function::getIntrinsicID() const: Assertion `0 &&

OK, I noticed a few problems with my previous email, so I will boil the question down: What I want to do is compile for x86 and ia64 from darwin. I also want to load my own passes into opt and llc. Should I be using llvmc at all here, or should I be doing something like llvmgcc -> gccas -> opt -> llc ? I've given up on the filetype=obj argument, so now the problem is that llc is

> Okay, I took a closer look at your output. > > I was correct in that gccas is attempting to assemble a native PPC > assembly language file. However, this appears to be happening because > the assembly file is generated by the GCC Makefiles for libgcc2 (in > llvm-gcc/gcc/config/rs6000/t-ppccomm, I think). > > The first thing I would try is Marco's suggestion: add

I want to use PgmDependenceGraph pass , but my pass cannot work with PgmDependenceGraph. I tried again in Hello2 pass, and it could not work also. The following is I did with llvm/lib/Transforms/Hello.cpp: 1.insert #include "llvm/Analysis/PgmDependenceGraph.h" in Hello.cpp. 2.insert AU.addRequired<PgmDependenceGraph>() in the getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) of Hello2.

Right now I am trying to capture the function name and the number of arguments , so this following is the pass I wrote . ------------------------------------------------------------- struct pass06a : public ModulePass { virtual bool runOnModule(Module &M) { std::vector<const Type*> pList; pList.push_back( PointerType::get(Type::SByteTy) ); pList.push_back(

Alkis Evlogimenos wrote: >Is there a chance you can try cvs? I would be interested to >get a simplified test case where the allocator breaks. A lot of >improvements went into the x86 backend since 1.2 and we currently have >no test cases where the allocator breaks today. > > I updated and recompiled and the error is still there. It turns out that I cannot use the bugpoint

I just got the CVS version of LLVM running tonight. On my PowerBook, one of the examples (HowToUseJIT) has an assertion error when I try and run it: Running foo: JIT.cpp:217: failed assertion `!isAlreadyCodeGenerating && "Error: Recursive compilation detected!"' However, when I compile and run the same program on x86 Linux, it runs fine (Running foo: Result: 11). I

Hi, Thank Brian Gaeke so much. Following TraceBasicBlocks.cpp, I modified the code as below and could insert instruction or function I need into anywhere in Module. But it works well without BB->getInstList().push_back(InstrCall), and if I add the BB->getInstList().push_back() following new CallInst(), I got error information when runing opt. What is the reason for it? And is it necessary

Hi, Now, I've build the tools and the cfe. However, 'make check' gave me the attached results. Summarized as follows: # of expected passes 1081 # of unexpected failures 26 # of expected failures 32 I configured llvm with following options: '--prefix=/home/hb/llvm/ --enable-targets=host-only'. I used gcc version 3.4.2 to build the tools and cfe. The cfe is version:

Hi Henrik, You don't have the latest C/C++ Front End Source code. Please update from CVS to get the fix for the 2005-06-15-ExpandGotoInternalProblem.c test. Note the date of the test (5 days ago). Reid. On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 18:42 +0200, Henrik Bach wrote: > Hi, > > Now, I've build the tools and the cfe. However, 'make check' gave me the > attached results.

Hi Reid, Now, I've removed the file and updated the source tree with this command: cvs -z3 -d :pserver:anon at llvm-cvs.cs.uiuc.edu:/var/cvs/llvm update -PdR llvm However, the file still exits. Henrik. >From: Reid Spencer >Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 10:57:54 -0700 > >Hi Henrik, > >You don't have the latest C/C++ Front End Source code. Please update >from CVS to get

I'm in a group tasked with improving the GC of LLVM for a 421 project. We are having trouble getting started with the given SemiSpace collector. We found the string llvm_gc_initialize called from a single source file ./test/Regression/CodeGen/Generic/GC/alloc_loop.ll which we tried with the following... (showing LLVM checked out from cvs a few days ago, similar output with release 1.3) $