similar to: [LLVMdev] Time to remove QMtest?

On Sunday 28 November 2004 00:24, Tanya Lattner wrote: Just some comments from a QMTest user... Note however, that even with them, dejagnu looks better. > Cons of QMTest: > 1) You have to use the gui to add directories. I think you're wrong. Manually creating a directory would work, as QMTest does not place anything special in directories. > 2) You have to use the gui to XFAIL

Tanya Lattner wrote: > I've finished adding the -rundejagnu option to the nightly tester script, > which was the last step to fully support Dejagnu. I think now is the > appropriate time to discuss keeping QMTest or switching to Dejagnu. A lot > of work went into using QMTest, so I think we should make this decision > carefully and before the 1.4 release. > > Here are the

> > Cons of QMTest: > > 1) You have to use the gui to add directories. > > I think you're wrong. Manually creating a directory would work, as QMTest does > not place anything special in directories. I may have worded this poorly, but I think you have to use the gui to add new directories or tests, or specific tests. Otherwise, it does not know what to do with those

I've finished adding the -rundejagnu option to the nightly tester script, which was the last step to fully support Dejagnu. I think now is the appropriate time to discuss keeping QMTest or switching to Dejagnu. A lot of work went into using QMTest, so I think we should make this decision carefully and before the 1.4 release. Here are the pros and cons in my eyes, please feel free to add your

I'm not sure if dejagnu is installed correctly. Is there any way to call it on the command line? I get this: ------------------- $ runtest --version | tee -a my_runtest.log WARNING: Couldn't find the global config file. Expect version is 5.21 Tcl version is 8.0 Framework version is 1.4.4 ------------------- and ------------------- $ ls /usr/local/share/dejagnu/

OK, that explains it. I probably didn't have runtest installed the last time I ran configure, and re-syncing with CVS also caused it to reconfigure, solving the problem but confusing me. Thanks, -mike On 8/24/05, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Michael McCracken wrote: > > I'm mostly up to date, but not completely current with CVS. Is this

> > > 6. Have you given any thought to using automake to generate your > > > Makefiles? I use automake extensively and would prefer to > > > continue to use it with LLVM. It is simple and works well on > > > many platforms. If you'd like to go this route, I'd be willing > > > to do the conversion for you.

On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Michael McCracken wrote: > I'm mostly up to date, but not completely current with CVS. Is this > something that's been fixed recently, or is it a problem on my end? Try rerunning configure. For some reason, configure decided you didn't have runtest/expect. rerun configure, and if it still doesn't work, please send your config.log to llvmbugs. Thx,

On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Henrik Bach wrote: > You're right. And no errors or results where generated: > PATH=/C/projects/build/MinGW/llvm-2-1/Debug/bin:/C/projects/src/llvm-2/llvm/test/Scripts:.:/usr/local/bin:/mingw/bin:/bin:/mingw/bin:/usr/bin:/c/LLVM/tools:/c/perl/5.8.5/bin:/c/perl/5.8.5/bin/MSWin32-x86-multi-thread > \ > true runtest > make[1]: Leaving directory

Can any one, who has dejagnu and expect installed and working, send me an output when running '(g)make check' from llvm. Thanks. Henrik. ============================================================= Henrik Bach LLVM Open Source Developer e-mail: henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com ============================================================= 'Nothing is impossible; The impossible

In an effort to simplify how tests are added to the LLVM testsuite, I've added support for Dejagnu. This only applies to the Feature and Regression tests. If this experiment goes well, we may switch from using QMTest to Dejagnu. I'm asking for people (especially those running nightly testers) to give Dejagnu a try. You will need to install Dejagnu (http://www.gnu.org/software/dejagnu/)

On Sun, 9 Jan 2005, Henrik Bach wrote: > I found that it was runtest.exp which referenced to the internal exp_debug > function. For testing purposes I disabled the reference and ran a new: Hi Henrik, Unfortunately, none of us has access to a MinGW setup, so we cannot debug this problem. If you're hacking on dejagnu or expect itself (because it has not yet been ported to MinGW

Boy does THAT look familiar .. The problem is that you need an older version of QMTest, version 2.0.3 to be exact. The configuration of QMTest that LLVM uses won't work with 2.2 Reid. On Sun, 2004-06-20 at 10:53, Vladimir Merzliakov wrote: > I attempt install and use qmtest for run LLVM testsuit at FreeBSD, but > without success. > > I have installed qm-2.2 (latest and single

I attempt install and use qmtest for run LLVM testsuit at FreeBSD, but without success. I have installed qm-2.2 (latest and single version accessable from http://www.codesourcery.com/qmtest/download.html in sources) When I start qmtest for LLVM ("make qmtest" in <llvm-obj-dir>/test directory - right?) error printed: ---8X---------------

On Wed, 3 Nov 2004, Vladimir Merzliakov wrote: > >> It problem resolved? > >> > >> Vladimir > > > > Hi Vladimir, > > > > I assume you're talking about the FreeBSD run. I'm not sure what is going > > on > > No. You can see problem with Feature tests at > http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/testresults/X86/ also (see Feature Test Results

I'm having troubles running the test suite on OS X 10.4. Inside my objdir, 'make check' gives this: % make check llvm[0]: Running test suite

> I'm not sure if dejagnu is installed correctly. Is there any way to call it > on the command line? > > I get this: > ------------------- > $ runtest --version | tee -a my_runtest.log > WARNING: Couldn't find the global config file. > Expect version is 5.21 > Tcl version is 8.0 > Framework version is 1.4.4 > ------------------- It looks

The LLVM 1.4 Release is now out! Get it here: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/releases/ or read about it here: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/releases/1.4/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#whatsnew This release features a huge assortment of improvements in functionality, generated code quality, and compile times. Thanks to everyone who has helped make this release the best one yet. In addition to the changes

Hi All, Do to popular request, I just set up a new mailing list to capture the nightly tester output from the various testers running 'round the world. The new list is available here: http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-testresults If you're running a nightly tester, please update your crontab to send mail to the llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu list (potentially in addition

> Boy does THAT look familiar .. > > The problem is that you need an older version of QMTest, version 2.0.3 > to be exact. The configuration of QMTest that LLVM uses won't work with > 2.2 Ok, I will attempt with QMTest 2.0.3 I think this requirement can be added to http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/TestingGuide.html in "Requirements" section for simplify testsuit use by