similar to: [LLVMdev] Useless/Mis-placed Tests?

On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Reid Spencer wrote: > For some time now the tests in llvm-test/SingleSource/Regression and > llvm-test/SingleSource/UnitTests have been producing no meaningful > performance data other than "working". I think one of two things should > be done, on a case-by-case basis: > > 1. Tests that are clearly simple, quick running tests should be moved >

Okay, so how about #2? Shouldn't the SingleSource/Regression tests be modified to increase their execution time (by, say, executing the whole test multiple times) ? This would put them on the radar from a performance perspective. Reid. On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 10:17 -0500, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Reid Spencer wrote: > > > For some time now the tests in

Tanya, Here's the results for GNU/Linux, 2.6.18-1.2200.fc5smp (Fedora Core 5) HIGH LEVEL COMMENTS * The llvm-1.9.tar.gz file unpacks to a dir named "llvm". Shouldn't that be llvm-1.9? * LLVM was built in Release mode in all cases * I don't think this is ready for release. In particular the llvm-gcc4 binary seg faults on FC 5 for most of llvm-test programs. *

Hi Tanya, Here's my second attempt on Fedora Core 5. The changes this time are: 1. Using GCC 4.0.3 as the compiler 2. Building everything from source (no pre-built binaries used) BUILD LLVM WITH GCC 4.0.3 * No issues, just the usual warnings. BUILD LLVM-GCC WITH GCC 4.0.3 * No issues RUN LLVM-TEST WITH GCC 4.0.3 * The following failures were encountered. Some of them are

At the LLVM Developers' Meeting in November, I promised to work on isolating a subset of the current test suite that is useful for benchmarking. Having looked at this in more detail, most of the applications and benchmarks in the test suite are useful for benchmarking, and so I think that a better way of phrasing it is that we should construct a list of programs in the test suite that are not

Hello; I was able to build and install llvm(3.0) under Ubuntu 11.10 (using the ./configure script found under llvm source, and then make and make install). While configuring, I gave --prefix as a directory where I would like llvm to be installed. I did not give --with-llvmgccdir and the --enable-optimized argument to configure. Because 3.0 doesn't come with llvmgcc source/binaries and I

Hi Tanya, I've been checking the state of the various llvm-test failures on X86/Linux with GCC 3.4.6 and llvm-gcc4. I haven't finished this, but I thought the following might be useful for other people that are testing the release on Linux. Each group of failing tests below is followed by a comment about why its failing. llc /MultiSource/Applications/oggenc/oggenc jit

G'Day Tanya, Is it too late to bring in the following patches to fix some major brokenness in the AuroraUX tool chain for 2.6? http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Driver/Tools.cpp?r1=84468&r2=84469&view=diff&pathrev=84469 http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Driver/Tools.cpp?r1=84265&r2=84266&view=diff&pathrev=84266

Hi sir, I have built the test suits in following steps: 0. $cd LLVM_GCC_DIR; $gunzip --stdout llvm-gcc-4.2-*version*-* platform*.tar.gz | tar -xvf - 1. $cd SRC_DIR/llvm-2.8/projects 2. $svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/test-suite/trunk test-suite 3.$cd OBJ_DIR; 4. $SRC_DIR/configure --prefix=INS_DIR --enable-debug-runtime --disable-optimized --enable-debug-symbols

2009/3/28 John Mosby <ojomojo at gmail.com> > Thanks Duncan, > I figured it out after a couple of tries, but the docs are not as clear as > your instructions. If there's no specific maintainer of TestingGuide.html, > I'd be happy to update the docs to be as clear as your instructions. > > llvm/projects/Makefile filters out "test-suite" and

hi, when i change the OBJ_ROOT and recompile the llvm, it's successful. but run following test, then the error occues: ----------------------------------------------------- [yue at RH9 obj]$ make -C ./test/Programs make: Entering directory `/home/yue/llvm/obj/test/Programs' make[1]: Entering directory `/home/yue/llvm/obj/test/Programs/SingleSource' make[2]: Entering directory

Did something change with exception handling recently? A bunch of lit bots are showing slower compile times for many tests. Ciao, Duncan. On 20/06/12 07:53, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu wrote: > > lab-mini-03__O0-g__clang_DEV__x86_64 test results > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283?compare_to=1278&baseline=999> > > Run Order Start Time Duration >

Thanks for responding, Duncan, and clarifying that y'all need more info to help. I'm trying to compile binaries on os x 10.5.8 intel hardware that are compatible on ppc os x 10.4. When I include various flags to llvm-gcc, including: -m32 -arch ppc -isysroot /Developer/SDKs/MacOS10.4u.sdk -mmacosx-version-min=10.4 I am seeing errors when compiling using llvm-gcc 4.2. If I leave out

[qali at qali test-suite]$ make VERBOSE=1 if [ ! -f SingleSource/Makefile ]; \ then \ /home/qali/Src/llvm-2.8/autoconf/mkinstalldirs SingleSource; \ cp /home/qali/Src/llvm-2.8/projects/test-suite/SingleSource/Makefile SingleSource/Makefile; \ fi; \ make -C SingleSource all make[1]: Entering directory `/home/qali/build/llvm-2.8-rev/projects/test-suite/SingleSource' if [ ! -f UnitTests/Makefile

Nothing that I'm aware of has changed with EH. Is it possible to bisect the problem? -bw On Jun 20, 2012, at 12:38 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Did something change with exception handling recently? A bunch of lit bots are > showing slower compile times for many tests. > > Ciao, Duncan. > > On 20/06/12 07:53, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu

Hi Bill, > Nothing that I'm aware of has changed with EH. Is it possible to bisect the problem? I don't see any relevant LLVM changes, so I guess clang C++ compilation slowed down due to some clang changes. I'm not going to investigate this. Ciao, Duncan. > > -bw > > On Jun 20, 2012, at 12:38 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > >> Did

hi, when I run "make -C ./llvm/test/Programs", it show following error: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [root at RH9 llvm]# make -C ./llvm/test/Programs make: Entering directory `/usr/local/llvm/llvm/test/Programs' make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/llvm/llvm/test/Programs/SingleSource' make[2]: Entering directory

Reid Spencer wrote: > Have you modified the makefile in any way? Note that sse.expantfft.bc should be sse.expandfft.bc no, did'nt change it. the typo before seems to be an error while copying from the terminal. i've cleaned everything and tried again. this is the messsage: [brandner:/localtmp/brandner/dev/llvm-test:529] make -j1 TEST=nightly 2>&1 | tee report.nightly.raw.out

Hello, all- I am having trouble getting the test suite set up with my download of SPEC2006. I downloaded and installed llvm-gcc, checked out a copy of test-suite in llvm-2.8/projects, and then configured and made llvm: ./configure --enable-debug-runtime --disable-optimized --enable-spec2006=/home/jamiemmt/speccpu2006 --with-externals=/home/jamiemmt make The configure script found the SPEC

On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:32 PM, John Criswell <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote: > Aaron Gray wrote: > > I am trying to build llvm-test in a separate directory to the main llvm > tree. > > > > I have put llvm and llvm-gcc's bin directories on the path but think I am > missing a switch on the configure command. > > > You need to use --with-llvmsrc and