similar to: [LLVMdev] one question about up reference

hi, I have one question about up reference, why use \nested_level_count in type description. and have to handle it in HandleUpRefs() (AsmParser/llvmAsmParser.y) , why not just insert type name and return in calcTypeName() (AsmWriter.cpp) ; As you mention in "How to build recursively type" , %mylist = type { %mylist*, int } is accepted . Is it neccessary to use

lizhuo,您好！ 不是很明白你的意思，好像你想从一个ConstantExpr::getPtrPtrFromArrayPtr 指针得到这个ConstantExpr 的内容， 但你的困难在哪里？ ======= 2006-03-25 22:04:14 您在来信中写道：======= >hi >I have one llvm program like this : >.. >; define ConstantArray >"E1$str" = internal constant [3 x sbyte] c"E1\00" > >; use getPtrPtrFromArrayPtr to define SByte* from ConstantArray

Hi all, I want to open a device(/dev/sda1, /dev/hda2 etc) in which my file exists. I've used 'stat' system call to get the device id. But now I want the device name from this id(st_dev). How to get that one? Or Do you have any other method to know the device name where my file resides? Thanks Bollywood, fun, friendship, sports and more. You name it, we have it on

On Dec 6, 2006, at 10:44 AM, Andrew Lenharth wrote: > Currently, Structure layout is left to targets, which implement them > according to the ABI of that platform. While this is fine for most > structures, it makes packed structures very ugly. All fields in a > packed type must be converted to byte arrays with casts to access > fields, which bloats accesses and obsfucates the

On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Kenneth Uildriks <kennethuil at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 1:09 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >> >> On Jan 9, 2010, at 12:07 AM, Jon Harrop wrote: >> >>> On Saturday 09 January 2010 06:11:03 Chris Lattner wrote: >>>> My eventual goal (perhaps for LLVM 3.0) is to eliminate our

Dear All, Could someone tell me how to convert LLVM bytecode into minimal SSA form ? or just depend on GCC frontend ? thanks aqex

I see now, Thanks very much again I wish to express my gratitude to the developers of LLVM. It's really a excellent design and with many optimization implementation . great work ! I hope that someday I can do something for LLVM . aqex

Hi all, I used netperf to measure throughput between dom0 & domU. The throughput between dom0 -> domU was 256.00 Mb/sec domU -> dom0 was 401.15 Mb/sec. The throughput between dom0 & domU seems to be very asymmetry. To my surprise the throughput between domU -> dom0 is more. The value which I specified are consistent values. Is

hello， I used the patch in xen4.1 and enabled it has the feature of numa placement,but has the earlier said problem.Can you help me that what is the reason? And where is the newest version of the patch，pls provide the latest development branch's address. Thanks, Regards, Butine huang Zhejiang University 2013-03-06 >On mer, 2013-03-06 at 10:49 +0000, butian huang wrote: >>

hi, I want to know some details about this network accelerated modules. 1)what''s the main purpose of this plugin module? 2)any requirement for harware nic? or other hardware platform? 3)I''ve not found the code in Xen3.1 code set. so was it added to xen source code yet? Thanks in advance _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list

On Sun, 20 Mar 2005, John Carrino wrote: > On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 04:05:32PM +0300, Vladimir Merzliakov wrote: >>>> Is assert(!NewSTy->isAbstract()) must pass after this line? >>> >>> In this case, yup. >>> >> I create test program and assert failed in it: >> >> { \2 *, sbyte * } > > How do I decode the \2 in this? I am

On Saturday 09 January 2010 06:11:03 Chris Lattner wrote: > My eventual goal (perhaps for LLVM 3.0) is to eliminate our current > structural type system altogether. The benefits are blown away by the > costs, eventually we should just fix this design mistake. In the meantime, > I'm not opposed to adding a Module* to VMCore that type dumping defaults to > if non-null. Can you

On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 07:01:55PM -0600, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Sun, 20 Mar 2005, John Carrino wrote: > > >On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 04:05:32PM +0300, Vladimir Merzliakov wrote: > >>>>Is assert(!NewSTy->isAbstract()) must pass after this line? > >>> > >>>In this case, yup. > >>> > >>I create test program and assert

hi I've some problems with netback 1.what's mmap_pages for, which come from balloon operation ？ mmap_pages = alloc_empty_pages_and_pagevec(MAX_PENDING_REQS) 2.what's the meaning of "refcnt" defined in netif_t (netif->refcnt) 3.irq enable and disable such as disable_irq(netif->irq); why netback use such enable & disable operations while netfront dont use for its

hi, my friends: recently, i am reading the source codes about hypercall. First, i study a simple hypercall, for example, the "do_xen_version". In "xen-3.1.0-src\xen\common\kernel.c", the definition of "do_xen_version" is: DO(xen_version) (int cmd, XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(void) arg) { .... } according to the " #define DO(fn) long do_##fn ", the expanded form is

Currently, Structure layout is left to targets, which implement them according to the ABI of that platform. While this is fine for most structures, it makes packed structures very ugly. All fields in a packed type must be converted to byte arrays with casts to access fields, which bloats accesses and obsfucates the types. First class support for packed types would clean up the generated code

Hi Samba community, Last year we upgraded from version 3.0.10 to 3.0.20b and at the same time switch from NT-domain controller membership to AD membership. After this upgrade we began to experience that drives sometimes were not mapped. We saw this both on our Citrix servers and on our XP PCs. A couple of weeks back we then moved to 3.0.21b in the hope that this misbehaviour would

Please keep conversations on-list so that everyone can help and benefit :-) On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 09:15:01PM +0800, Hightman(???) wrote: > James Aylett,??? > > Even if I split the two operator into different transaction one > after another, It cause DatabaseModifiedError Also ... It seems > that if I update one document by unique term frequently (within >

Hi everyone, What about llvm planet ,If most of the contributors already have blogs, like gentoo planet http://planet.gentoo.org and gnu planet http://planet.gnu.org ? Yours , Ling Kun On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > A few of us got together and started an official LLVM (and its sub-projects) blog: >