similar to: [LLVMdev] Sparc build error

Following the instructions here: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/TestingGuide.html#run I get an error running configure in the llvm-test directory. ./configure --with-llvmgccdir=/localhome/tbrethou/cfrontend/sparc/llvm-gcc/ --with-f2c=/home/vadve/shared/localtools/sparc --with-llvmsrc=/localhome/tbrethou/llvm --with-llvmobj=/localhome/tbrethou/llvm Error: [cut lots of config output] checking

Hi, What is the best way to debug an llc crash using bugpoint? I am getting the following crash that I would like to reduce llc: /home/vadve/aggarwa4/llvm29/llvm-2.9/lib/MC/MCAsmStreamer.cpp:273: virtual void<unnamed>::MCAsmStreamer::EmitLabel(llvm::MCSymbol*): Assertion `Symbol->isUndefined() && "Cannot define a symbol twice!"' failed. 0 llc

What's the config.log from this run? -bw On 11/3/05, Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: > > Following the instructions here: > http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/TestingGuide.html#run > > I get an error running configure in the llvm-test directory. > > ./configure > --with-llvmgccdir=/localhome/tbrethou/cfrontend/sparc/llvm-gcc/ >

Do something like this: bugpoint -run-llc <bitcode file> --tool-args -- <llc arguments> Cameron On May 23, 2011, at 1:33 PM, Arushi Aggarwal wrote: > Hi, > > What is the best way to debug an llc crash using bugpoint? > > I am getting the following crash that I would like to reduce > > llc: /home/vadve/aggarwa4/llvm29/llvm-2.9/lib/MC/MCAsmStreamer.cpp:273:

Hi everyone, I want to convert some 50 new machines that an organization is getting into Fedora Linux workstations. This is the current setup: The organization currently has one Primary Windows 2000 ADS and 2 numbers of Windows 2000 servers acting as Backup domain servers. There are currently some 50 workstations already in the network and these are all Windows 2000 professional machines.

Hi, Just got Fedora FC1 vanilla 2.4.25kernel+libata8patch booting problems, FC1 complains that it can not automatically find&found partitions specified with "LABEL=" in /etc/fstab, and then falls me into repair mode. In the repair mode I can mount it manually without any problems. More interesting are: 1) I have several partitions specified with "LABEL=*" in

Sparc is a popular target for architecture simulators, and removing that back end would force people using such simulators to use some other compiler infrastructure. Sparc is also useful for University courses. I'd strongly discourage removing this back end. --Vikram Professor, Computer Science University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign http://llvm.org/~vadve On Oct 25, 2011, at 4:00

Moved samba (acting as a standalone system) from a RH9 system to a FC1 system. It wont authenticate the users. Here is more of the specifics: 1. Users log into a Samba PDC. 2. Login scripts setup their mappings 3. Some mappings are on the PDC (these still work) 4. Some mappings are on the standalone server. 5. The version of samba on RH9 is 2.2.7 6. The version of samba on FC1 is 3.0.4 I

FYI, I completely agree that we shouldn't remove the sparc target. However, it is currently unmaintained, and has some pretty glaring bugs. Is anyone interested in stepping up to maintain the target? -Chris On Oct 25, 2011, at 6:35 AM, Vikram Adve wrote: > Sparc is a popular target for architecture simulators, and removing that back end would force people using such simulators to use

Sorry for that last message, it was intended for llvm at cs instead of llvmdev at cs. --Vikram http://www.cs.uiuc.edu/~vadve > -----Original Message----- > From: Vikram S. Adve [mailto:vadve at cs.uiuc.edu] > Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 1:55 PM > To: 'Nate Fyie' > Cc: 'LLVM Developers List' > Subject: RE: Ticket #7559: FW: Bradfields/PCJF-10959 > >

Hi everybody. I know that we can normally install source rpms designed for RH9 and FC1, but can we also install the binary RPMs for RH9 and/or FC1 on a CentOS 3 system ?

Where I work, we have an application that has been merrily running away (and being built) on FC1 (yes, you read that right). One of my assignments is to bring this up to CentOS, but on my first effort, I ran into this interesting "feature." The original build process (FC1) uses mkdep to generate the dependency files that are subsequently used by the makes to build the app. mkdep does

Hi, I am getting this when running make-test :- $ /usr/src/llvm-test-2.5/configure checking for spec95 benchmark sources... no, not found in /home/vadve/shared/ben chmarks/spec95/benchspec checking for spec2000 benchmark sources... no, not found in /home/vadve/shared/b enchmarks/speccpu2000/benchspec checking for spec2006 benchmark sources... no, not found in /home/vadve/shared/b

Great! Could you please add a /localhome directory to each of them? Since there are 2 disks per machine, perhaps the best thing to do would to make /localhome a real directory and make separate local directories on each disk, so that we can each do something like this: /localhome/vadve -> /mounts/seraph/disks/0/localhome/vadve /localhome/lattner ->

On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com> wrote: > These benchmarks are not distributed with llvm (which doesn't have the > legal right to distribute Spec, for example). If you have them from > another source, you need to configure --with-externals=<path> Okay, thanks. Thre should be better warning/error reporting though. Aaron > >

These benchmarks are not distributed with llvm (which doesn't have the legal right to distribute Spec, for example). If you have them from another source, you need to configure --with-externals=<path> On Feb 23, 2009, at 10:02 AMPST, Aaron Gray wrote: > Hi, > > I am getting this when running make-test :- > > $ /usr/src/llvm-test-2.5/configure > checking for

On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com > wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com> wrote: > >> These benchmarks are not distributed with llvm (which doesn't have the >> legal right to distribute Spec, for example). If you have them from >> another source, you need to configure

Test Cases: (attached) Iteration code: (...) typedef TarjanSCC_iterator<CallGraph*> MyTarjan; CallGraph& callGraph = getAnalysis<CallGraph>(); MyTarjan iter = tarj_begin(&callGraph); MyTarjan end = tarj_end(&callGraph); while(iter!=end) iter++; (...) if you take the time to print out the function each non-looping node iter traverses, it never reaches main...

Thanks, Chris, Below is the output of 'llvmgcc he.c -v' xli3|csil-suna27|~/cs426|[35]% llvmgcc he.c -v Reading specs from /usr/dcs/projects/cs426/Software/gcc_install/bin/../lib/gcc-lib/llvm/3.1/specs Configured with: /home/vadve/lattner/cvs/gcc/configure --srcdir=/home/vadve/lattner/cvs/gcc --prefix=/home/vadve/lattner/cvs/gcc_install_sparc --target=llvm --enable-languages=c

Dear All, I'm having some problems using a function pass from a Module pass. My code is as follows: DominatorTree & domTree; ... Function &F = *I; // I is an interator from using Module::begin() ... domTree = getAnalysis<DominatorTree>(F); When I compile this code, I get the following error: /home/vadve/criswell/src/llvm22/include/llvm/Pass.h: In member function