similar to: [LLVMdev] performance results?

Hi there, I just tried a couple of ftp mirrors to grab the latest OpenSSH. ftp://ftp.solnet.ch/mirror/OpenBSD/OpenSSH/portable/ replies with a 550 and ftp://ftp.dragonbsd.swiss-anime.ch/pub/OpenBSD/OpenSSH/portable/ doesn't seem to have been updated since May. They were the first two I tried. Why me??? :) 73, Ged.

Thank you! I have read this article,and there is one dissertion about this in the attached file. What I really want to know is that if LLVM is appropriate for a block-based arch. If so,LLVM have already gained the ability to produce hyperblock or I need to write codes to let LLVM produce hyperblock? Regards, Wangwentao ,HIT On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 6:06 PM, 陳韋任 <chenwj

On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 09:34:04PM -0800, Andrew Trick wrote: > On Nov 3, 2011, at 3:20 AM, 王文涛 wrote: > > If so,LLVM have already gained the ability to produce hyperblock or I need to write codes to let LLVM produce hyperblock? > > You will not be able to represent hyperblocks without developing your own extensions to the IR. The extent to which you would be able to reuse LLVM

I have found that when passwords are reset from a windows machine, the default password expiry period is around 40 days. I would like to change this to say 90 days, but have been unable to find a way. I tried the option "password expire time" but testparm doesn't seem to recognise it. There is nothing in the official Samba How-to about this. Has anyone managed to set thier

On Nov 3, 2011, at 3:20 AM, 王文涛 wrote: > If so,LLVM have already gained the ability to produce hyperblock or I need to write codes to let LLVM produce hyperblock? You will not be able to represent hyperblocks without developing your own extensions to the IR. The extent to which you would be able to reuse LLVM optimizations after converting to your hyperblock IR (if at all) would depend on

Hi guys, I am new for llvm,and I want to write a backend for TRIPS arch. So I am wondering if llvm can produce hyperblock easily,can anyone help? Any tips are welcomed. Thank you ! wangwentao , HIT -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello everyone, One of Google's summer interns, George Burgess IV, created an implementation of the CFL pointer-aliasing analysis algorithm, and this has now been added to LLVM trunk. Now we should determine whether it is worthwhile adding this to the default optimization pipeline. For ease of testing, I've added the command line option -use-cfl-aa which will cause the CFL analysis to be

In lto+pgo some (5 out of 12 with usual suspect like perlbench and gcc among them using -flto -Wl,-mllvm,-use-cfl-aa -Wl,-mllvm,-use-cfl-aa-in-codegen) the CINT2006 benchmarks don’t compile. Has the implementation been tested with lto? If not, please stress the implementation more. Do we know reasons for gains? Where did you expect the biggest gains? Some of the losses will likely boil down to

> So I am wondering if llvm can produce hyperblock easily,can anyone ^^^^^^^^^^ Do you mean the one mentioned in the paper below? http://www.eecs.umich.edu/~mahlke/papers/1992/mahlke_micro92.pdf Regards, chenwj -- Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任) Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.)

Hi, Wang After doing a little study by reading [1], it seems the hyberblock is pretty similar to the concept of bundle in VLIW. Am I right? If so, there were discussions about VLIW on the list before. Regards, chenwj [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explicit_Data_Graph_Execution -- Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任) Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.)

I thought I'd share a little bit of progress I made this weekend. I've gotten the first interesting test-case (a simple switch) through hyperblock-based DAGISel, and there's a pretty picture too! Each part of the switch is emitted directly into the DAG, rather than being deferred. This is the function: define i32 @foo(i32 %x, i32 %z) nounwind { entry: switch i32 %x,

On CINT2006 ARM64/ref input/lto+pgo I practically measure no performance difference for the 7 benchmarks that compile. This includes bzip2 (although different source base than in CINT2000), mcf, hmmer, sjeng, h364ref, astar, xalancbmk On Sep 15, 2014, at 11:59 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Gerolf Hoflehner"

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gerolf Hoflehner" <ghoflehner at apple.com> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: "LLVM Dev" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>, "Jiangning Liu" <liujiangning1 at gmail.com>, "George Burgess IV" > <george.burgess.iv at gmail.com> > Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014

Hi ,Chen Thanks for your answer.Maybe there are some common things,but I think hyperblock is more complex. I will see the topics about VLIW.Thank you for the direction. By the way ,what do you use LLVM for ?[?] Anyway,you are a kind hearted man.Thank you! Regards, Wangwentao ,HIT On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 6:18 PM, 陳韋任 <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw>

Hi, The standard error from logistic regression is slightly different from the naive SE from GEE under independence working correlation structure. Shouldn't they be identical? Anyone has insight about this? Thanks, Qiong a<-rbinom(1000,1) b<-rbinom(1000,2,0.1) c<-rbinom(1000,10,0.5) summary(gee(a~b, id=c,family="binomial",corstr="independence"))$coef

Hi folks, I have been stumped on a compilation problem when I tried to build 176.gcc of SPEC CPU2000 with clang v 2.8 (trunk 427) on Linux and intel. First, I tried to compile with 'clang -std=c89 *.c -o gcc.clang' since the default C standard of Clang is c99 while that of gcc is c89. It reported this error: ./c-gperf.h:14:1: error: unknown type name 'inline' inline ^

Hi, can someobne help me with PalmDesktop and Wine? How does it work? I can't even install :-( InstallWizard comes up but then fails: fixme:rpc:I_RpcServerStopListening (): stub fixme:rpc:I_RpcWindowProc (0x40066,00000002,00000000,00000000): stub fixme:rpc:I_RpcWindowProc (0x40066,00000082,00000000,00000000): stub err:advapi:service_control_dispatcher failed to create pipe for

Hi, I could not use 'exlcude=' option in factor() to exclude a level from a existing factor. x is a factor: > x [1] a b c Levels: a b c > factor(x,exclude="c") [1] a b c Levels: a b c Warning message: NAs introduced by coercion However, "c" is not coded as NA. The following does not work either: >

Very nice! Why did you decide on hyperblock instead of SEME region and how are you forming the blocks? Evan On Apr 20, 2008, at 9:59 PM, Christopher Lamb wrote: > I thought I'd share a little bit of progress I made this weekend. > I've gotten the first interesting test-case (a simple switch) > through hyperblock-based DAGISel, and there's a pretty picture too! >

Hi, Does anyone know how to make the color of the lines all black when plotting groupedData with an outer factor: For example, library(nlme) plot(Dialyzer, outer=~QB, key=F) This generated colored curves in R.2.4.1. How to make all the curves black ? (or how to alter the color (type) of lines for the nlme groupedData plotting function in general?) Thanks Qiong