similar to: [LLVMdev] Testing Release 1.5

Misha Brukman wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 01:20:48PM -0500, John Criswell wrote: > >>Personally, I never use "gmake check." >> >>What I do is checkout everything out, build it, run the tests in >>"llvm/test," and then run all of the tests in the llvm-test CVS >>module. > > > I think the nightly test script can be used for

On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 01:20:48PM -0500, John Criswell wrote: > Personally, I never use "gmake check." > > What I do is checkout everything out, build it, run the tests in > "llvm/test," and then run all of the tests in the llvm-test CVS > module. I think the nightly test script can be used for this specific task, after all, that's what it's designed

Dear All, I've finished building binaries for the GCC frontends and am now testing the 1.5 release branch on i386/Linux, Sparc/Solaris, and PowerPC/MacOS X. I'm looking for volunteers to test LLVM 1.5 on platforms that we don't have in house. I'm specifically looking for people who can do: Itanium FreeBSD/i386 Windows (Cygwin, MingW, etc) I'm mainly interested in major

Reid Spencer wrote: > On Sun, 2004-10-10, Misha Brukman asked "Why can't we use wildcards > instead of listing all the sources" and then wrote in response to my > reply: > >>On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 04:40:48PM -0700, Reid Spencer wrote: >> >>>http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_mono/automake.html#wildcards >>> >>>is your

Dear All, First, we're pushing back the creation of the release branch until tonight. This means two things: 1. If you want something to go into LLVM 1.5, you have until I create the release branch to get it in. I am tentatively scheduling this for 5:00 pm today (CST). 2. If you don't want something to go into LLVM 1.5, please refrain from adding it until I create the release

Sean Peisert wrote: > John, > > I may be missing something here, but if I the compilation docs, I need > to build LLVM first and the C frontend second. But doing this, I > get: > > **llvm-gcc/llvm-g++ was not found, > > (obviously -- it wasn't installed, right?) You do need to build LLVM first before building llvm-gcc. This may seem a bit weird, but

Misha Brukman wrote: > On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 12:16:04AM +0400, Valery A.Khamenya wrote: > >>Building PowerPC.td register information header with tblgen >>Included from PowerPC.td:22: >>Parsing PowerPCInstrInfo.td:53: Variable not defined: 'GPRC'! >>make[3]: *** [PowerPCGenRegisterInfo.h.inc] Error 1 >>make[3]: Leaving directory

On Sun, 2004-10-10, Misha Brukman asked "Why can't we use wildcards instead of listing all the sources" and then wrote in response to my reply: > On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 04:40:48PM -0700, Reid Spencer wrote: > > http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_mono/automake.html#wildcards > > > > is your answer. > > I think their "answer" is

Henrik Bach wrote: > Hi > > I noticed that these defines (line 35 to 37) are hardcoded in the > DataTypes.h include file: > ---------------- > #define HAVE_SYS_TYPES_H 1 > #define HAVE_INTTYPES_H 1 > #define HAVE_STDINT_H 1 > ---------------- > > Shouldn't they have be defined by the configure script into > llvm/Config/config.h? These lines are set by

ymxia at nudt.edu.cn wrote: > When I compiled a linux kernel, gccas was used to compile assembly code. > > But gccas cannot recognize the line comment character "#" of gnu assembler, > > and abort the compile with reporting a error "syntax error, unexpected $undefined". > > I watch llvm/tools/gccas, but donot known how to add this function in it. >

Reid Spencer wrote: > On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 12:21, John Criswell wrote: > >>In regards to Misha's comments about the automatic execution of bytecode >>files, there are several ways to do it: >> >>1) Have bytecode files start with #!<JIT/llee/whatever> (portable) >>2) Encapsulate with ELF >>3) Register the type with the kernel (Linux only)

Dear All, I would like to create the release branch for the llvm-gcc source code tomorrow morning. I imagine this will be okay as llvm-gcc seems pretty healthy and no one is currently doing any development on it. If there's something that needs to be fixed, or you're working on llvm-gcc, please email the list so that I can delay creating the branch as appropriate. I won't be

Brian Gaeke wrote: > > A typo in test/Makefile was the trigger for this problem: > > http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20041101/ > 020216.html > > John, can you please look into this bug some more and add some error > checking to the llvm-specific qmtest python modules to make this error > less severe? Does the fork bomb occur in the

hi, I'm really new to llvm. I've successfully bootstrapped llvm-14 on my system and am able to successfully compile c code to llvm. the problem is now that gccld is complaining that it can't find the libraries, like "c" or "crtend". [1] all is fine, if I just use intrinsified functions like printf and friends, but I want to use the clock_gettime function and

ymxia at nudt.edu.cn wrote: > Hi, > > I want to check some properties of linux kernel with llvm, but I don't know how to compile a > > linux kernel to an llvm's .bc file. I have let llvm's gcc front-end ignore inline assembly by > > modifying cfrontend/src/gcc/llvm-expand.c, and replace CC/as/ar in the Makefile of the kernel > > with

Dear All, I created the LLVM 1.5 release branch this afternoon. It is called release_15. I would prefer that people hold off on committing non-release changes to the mainline until after the release is complete (as people sometimes request that I fold more mainline changes into the branch). However, if you need to commit something, you can do so. Within the next day or two, I'll be

Alex Vinokur wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to use LLVM-GCC to compare its performance with other compilers. > Something like testsuite "Computing very large Fibonacci numbers" at > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.c%2B%2B.perfometer/37. > > > My environment: > ----------------- > Windows 2000 > Cygwin > $ uname -srom > CYGWIN_NT-5.0

Is the source code for llva available esp the linux kernel port. Is there a project page for llva ? Mike On 2/3/06, John Criswell <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote: > Misha Brukman wrote: > > I don't know the current status of the LLVA project, so I will let the > > current developers chime in. Please send all LLVM and LLVA questions to > > llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu .

Misha Brukman wrote: > I don't know the current status of the LLVA project, so I will let the > current developers chime in. Please send all LLVM and LLVA questions to > llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu . My apologies for the late reply. > > ----- Forwarded message from N O S P A M <ti_dak at yahoo.com> ----- > > Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 09:47:32 -0800 (PST) > From: N O

"John Criswell" <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote in message news:4162A940.8090307 at cs.uiuc.edu... > Alex Vinokur wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I would like to use LLVM-GCC to compare its performance with other compilers. > > Something like testsuite "Computing very large Fibonacci numbers" at > >