Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc loop unrolling"
2016 Oct 12
2
Loop Unrolling Fail in Simple Vectorized loop
Hi all,
Attached herewith is a simple vectorized function with loops performing a
simple shuffle.
I want all loops (inner and outer) to be unrolled by 2 and as such used
-unroll-count=2
The inner loops(with k as the induction variable and having constant trip
counts) unroll fully, but the outer loop with (j) fails to unroll.
The llvm code is also attached with inner loops fully unrolled.
To
2016 Oct 13
2
Loop Unrolling Fail in Simple Vectorized loop
Thanks for the explanation. But I am a little confused with the following
fact. Can't LLVM keep vectorizable_elements as a symbolic value and convert
the loop to say;
for(unsigned i = 0; i < vectorizable_elements ; i += 2){
//main loop
}
for(unsigned i=0 ; i < vectorizable_elements % 2; i++){
//fix up
}
Why does it have to reason about the range of vectorizable_elements? Even
2016 Oct 13
2
Loop Unrolling Fail in Simple Vectorized loop
If count > MAX_UINT-4 your loop loops indefinitely with an increment of 4,
I think.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Charith Mendis via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> So, I tried unrolling the following simple loop.
>
> int unroll(unsigned * a, unsigned * b, unsigned *c, unsigned count){
>
> for(unsigned i=0; i<count; i++){
>
> a[i] =
2014 Jul 15
4
[LLVMdev] Partial loop unrolling
Hi,
PS: It is a generic question related to partial loop unrolling, and nothing
specific to LLVM.
As far as partial loop unrolling is concerned, I could see following three
different possibilities. Assume that unroll factor is 3.
Original loop:
for (i = 0; i < 10; i++)
{
do_foo(i);
}
1. First possibility
i = 0;
do_foo(i++);
do_foo(i++);
2014 Jan 21
5
[LLVMdev] Loop unrolling opportunity in SPEC's libquantum with profile info
On 16/01/2014, 23:47 , Andrew Trick wrote:
>
> On Jan 15, 2014, at 4:13 PM, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google.com
> <mailto:dnovillo at google.com>> wrote:
>
>> Chandler also pointed me at the vectorizer, which has its own
>> unroller. However, the vectorizer only unrolls enough to serve the
>> target, it's not as general as the runtime-triggered
2009 Apr 22
4
[LLVMdev] Strange loop unrolling problem
I am having a strange problem with loop unrolling. Attached is
a small example that demonstrates what happens.
There is a for-loop with a known trip count, and some control
flow inside the loop. If the condition of the control flow only
depends on the loop index and loop invariant variables, the loop
is not unrolled. However, if the condition involves potentially
loop variant variables, the loop
2009 Apr 27
1
[LLVMdev] Strange loop unrolling problem (partially solved)
A short while ago I wrote about the strange loop unrolling
behavior we encountered. The problem was that with -O3,
the following loop does not get unrolled if the ifdef'ed
dead code is not present.
------------------------------------
extern volatile int v1;
int unroll() {
int i;
int v2 = 0;
for(i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
if (i == v2) { v1 = 1000;
} else { v1 = 1001;
}
2014 Jan 15
2
[LLVMdev] Loop unrolling a function
The loop rotation pass does modify the function, which I'm guessing means
that a FunctionPassManager can be used to run LoopPasses (this is not
obvious to me after looking through the FunctionPassManager code).
Unfortunately none of the other passes I'm using (ScalarEvolution, LCSSA,
IndVarSimplify, and LoopUnroll) appear to have an effect.
I verified that the function can be loop
2012 Nov 21
2
[LLVMdev] Disable loop unroll pass
I just wanted to add to Krzysztof's response. I'm not sure if you're
referring to the case when a compile-time trip count loop is completely
unrolled or for a loop with a run-time trip count, which would be partially
unrolled. For Hexagon, if we partially unroll a loop, we'd also like to use
our hardware loop instructions. That is, unrolling and hardware loops are
2012 Nov 21
0
[LLVMdev] Disable loop unroll pass
Hi Brendon, Krzysztof,
Thanks for your responses.
On 21/11/2012 20:49, Brendon Cahoon wrote:
> I just wanted to add to Krzysztof's response. I'm not sure if you're
> referring to the case when a compile-time trip count loop is completely
> unrolled or for a loop with a run-time trip count, which would be partially
> unrolled. For Hexagon, if we partially unroll a loop,
2015 Aug 20
2
loop unrolling introduces conditional branch
Hi,
I want to use loop unrolling pass, however, I find that loop unrolling will
introduces conditional branch at end of every "unrolled" part. For example,
consider the following code
*void foo( int n, int array_x[])*
*{*
* for (int i=0; i < n; i++)*
* array_x[i] = i; *
*}*
Then I use this command "opt-3.5 try.bc -mem2reg -loops -loop-simplify
-loop-rotate -lcssa
2014 Jan 28
2
[LLVMdev] Loop unrolling opportunity in SPEC's libquantum with profile info
In r200270 I added support to unroll conditional stores in the loop vectorizer.
It is currently off pending further benchmarking and can be enabled with "-mllvm -vectorize-num-stores-pred=1”.
Furthermore, I added a heuristic to unroll until load/store ports are saturated “-mllvm enable-loadstore-runtime-unroll” instead of the pure size based heuristic.
Those two together with a patch that
2012 Nov 21
4
[LLVMdev] Disable loop unroll pass
Hi,
We've a target which has hardware support for zero-overhead loops.
Currently, we cannot detect them because the loop unroller is unrolling
them before entering into the codegen. Looking at its implementation, it
seems that it checks if it is profitable to unroll it or not based on
certain parameters.
Given that zero cost loops building is based more or less on the same
constraints
2017 Jan 31
0
(RFC) Adjusting default loop fully unroll threshold
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 4:59 PM Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote:
>
>
> Another question is about PGO integration: is it already hooked there?
> Should we have a more aggressive threshold in a hot function? (Assuming
> we’re willing to spend some binary size there but not on the cold path).
>
>
> I would even wire the *unrolling* the other way: just
2014 Jan 16
11
[LLVMdev] Loop unrolling opportunity in SPEC's libquantum with profile info
I am starting to use the sample profiler to analyze new performance
opportunities. The loop unroller has popped up in several of the
benchmarks I'm running. In particular, libquantum. There is a ~12%
opportunity when the runtime unroller is triggered.
This helps functions like quantum_sigma_x
(http://sourcecodebrowser.com/libquantum/0.2.4/gates_8c_source.html#l00149).
The function accounts
2015 Aug 21
2
loop unrolling introduces conditional branch
There's been some recent noise on the mailing list about requiring
-fno-rtti;
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-August/089010.html
Could that be it?
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 12:21 AM, Xiangyang Guo via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hi, James and Philip, Thanks for your help.
>
> Based on your advice, I downloaded llvm-3.7. However, with this new
2017 Jan 31
2
(RFC) Adjusting default loop fully unroll threshold
Recollected the data from trunk head with stddev data and more threshold
data points attached:
Performance:
stddev/mean 300 450 600 750
403 0.37% 0.11% 0.11% 0.09% 0.79%
433 0.14% 0.51% 0.25% -0.63% -0.29%
445 0.08% 0.48% 0.89% 0.12% 0.83%
447 0.16% 3.50% 2.69% 3.66% 3.59%
453 0.11% 1.49% 0.45% -0.07% 0.78%
464 0.17% 0.75% 1.80% 1.86% 1.54%
Code size:
300 450 600 750
403 0.56% 2.41% 2.74% 3.75%
2015 Aug 20
2
loop unrolling introduces conditional branch
Hi Xiangyang,
The algorithm for loop unrolling was changed post-3.5 to do more what you'd
expect. If you use 3.6 or 3.7 you'll likely get better results.
Cheers,
James
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 at 18:09 Philip Reames via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> On 08/20/2015 07:38 AM, Xiangyang Guo via llvm-dev wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I want to use loop unrolling
2017 Jan 31
3
(RFC) Adjusting default loop fully unroll threshold
> On Jan 30, 2017, at 4:56 PM, Dehao Chen <dehao at google.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com <mailto:chandlerc at google.com>> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 3:51 PM Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>> On Jan 30,
2014 Jan 15
3
[LLVMdev] Loop unrolling a function
Hi all,
I'm attempting to perform loop unrolling on a single function using the C++
API. Maybe I missed something in the docs, but I cannot figure out a way to
do this. The function I'm working with is very simple, containing a single
for loop and not much else. I compiled the function to IR using clang with
no optimizations enabled.
My initial plan was to first run the IndVarSimplify