similar to: [LLVMdev] Best way to require a pass from a dynamically loaded module?

Hi, I'm trying to access an analysis pass from the Inliner pass, and I'm having a lot of trouble getting that to work - I can verify that my pass is loaded and run (it is a dynamically loaded pass that is part of an analysisgroup), however, when I access it using getAnalysis<> from within Inliner::runOnSCC, I am instead getting the default, dummy version of my analysis, which should

On Tue, 21 Mar 2006, Michael McCracken wrote: > opt: /home/mmccrack/lens/obj-llvm-darcslocal/../llvm-darcslocal/llvm/lib/VMCore/PassManagerT.h:426: > void llvm::PassManagerT<UnitType>::markPassUsed(const llvm::PassInfo*, > llvm::Pass*) [with UnitType = llvm::Module]: Assertion > `getAnalysisOrNullUp(P) && > dynamic_cast<ImmutablePass*>(getAnalysisOrNullUp(P))

On 3/21/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Mon, 20 Mar 2006, Michael McCracken wrote: > > > Hi, I'm trying to access an analysis pass from the Inliner pass, and > > I'm having a lot of trouble getting that to work - I can verify that > > my pass is loaded and run (it is a dynamically loaded pass that is > > part of an analysisgroup),

A On 3/21/06, Michael McCracken <michael.mccracken at gmail.com> wrote: > On 3/21/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Mar 2006, Michael McCracken wrote: > > > > > Hi, I'm trying to access an analysis pass from the Inliner pass, and > > > I'm having a lot of trouble getting that to work - I can verify that > >

On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, Michael McCracken wrote: > the bytecode with lli - I get the following error: > > $ lli -load=/home/mmccrack/linux/lib/libTau.sh leo-inline-300-tau.bc > ERROR: Program used external function > '__llvm_cxxeh_allocate_exception' which could not be resolved! This is most likely because you are trying to link with llvmgcc, not with llvm-g++. Make sure that

Hi, I have a large-ish application I'm trying to build with LLVM, so I replaced g++ in the Makefiles with llvm-g++. This appears to work fine when I pass -Wl,-native to generate an ELF executable, but I want to control the inlining threshold it uses, so I am now passing -Wl,-disable-inlining and -Wa,-disable-inlining, and having it generate LLVM bytecode, then running opt -inlining to generate

Another option might be g95 instead of gfortran. I haven't used it for a while, but I seem to recall it working fine in gcc 4.0.1. On 9/11/06, Michael McCracken <michael.mccracken at gmail.com> wrote: > On 9/9/06, Michael McCracken <michael.mccracken at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 9/9/06, Steven Bosscher <stevenb.gcc at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 9/9/06, Chris

I'm having troubles running the test suite on OS X 10.4. Inside my objdir, 'make check' gives this: % make check llvm[0]: Running test suite

Hi, I am trying to do something similar to the profiling target in the llvm-test suite makefiles, but I'm not a gmake expert, so I am stumped on something: I did some copy-and-paste of the profile code in llvm-test/Makefile.programs and got it working within SingleSource/Benchmarks, where I can say 'make pmf' or 'make profile' and get a build with profiling results or my own

On 9/9/06, Michael McCracken <michael.mccracken at gmail.com> wrote: > On 9/9/06, Steven Bosscher <stevenb.gcc at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 9/9/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > > > On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Steven Bosscher wrote: > > > > You wrote: > > > >> The NIST F77 test suite doesn't seem to be compatible with

OK, I noticed a few problems with my previous email, so I will boil the question down: What I want to do is compile for x86 and ia64 from darwin. I also want to load my own passes into opt and llc. Should I be using llvmc at all here, or should I be doing something like llvmgcc -> gccas -> opt -> llc ? I've given up on the filetype=obj argument, so now the problem is that llc is

I just noticed this - I can't promise any particular amount of TLC, but I'll certainly be giving the Fortran front-end some attention as soon as LLVM moves to gcc 4.2. For future reference, does anyone know of a good free Fortran compiler test suite? Cheers, -mike On 5/14/07, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Duraid, > > > Does anyone know what the

Hi, I'm using LLVM as part of my thesis project and wanted to let the community know about it. (And get your feedback :) The project is called LENS. It's a file format and a framework for storing generic information about a program based on the control structure of the program, and quickly building tools to interact with that data. It might be best to think of the format as an external

Hi - I wanted to make a pass available for use with llc, and found that even though there is a PassInfo::LLC value, it isn't currently used. If you compare analyze.cpp and opt.cpp to llc.cpp, the first two find appropriate pass names with a FilteredPassNameParser and create them, but llc does not - it just gets all the passes it wants through the TargetMachine. Is there a particular reason

OK, that explains it. I probably didn't have runtest installed the last time I ran configure, and re-syncing with CVS also caused it to reconfigure, solving the problem but confusing me. Thanks, -mike On 8/24/05, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Michael McCracken wrote: > > I'm mostly up to date, but not completely current with CVS. Is this

On 7/25/05, Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 21:48 -0700, Michael McCracken wrote: > > On 7/25/05, Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > > > Why not just create your pass as a shared object and: > > > > > > opt -load mypass.so -mypass | llc > > > > My pass is an implementation of an analysis group that

On 9/1/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Michael McCracken wrote: > > I wanted to know if I should submit patches with comments around them > > like the "APPLE LOCAL LLVM" ones that mark the LLVM-only changes to > > the tree. I'd like to make it as easy as possible to apply these, so > > let me know any rules I

On 9/1/06, Michael McCracken <michael.mccracken at gmail.com> wrote: > On 9/1/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > > On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Michael McCracken wrote: [snip] > Now f951 doesn't crash when compiling, but still can't compile the > libgfortran files. It now finds some syntax errors in a generated file > that's part of the intrinsics

Hi, in a thread this afternoon about compiling the Fortran SPEC2000 to LLVM bytecode, Chris mentioned that it should be possible to compile to LLVM with the gfortran front end, although no one has necessarily tried it. I was surprised (and happy) to hear this, as under the impression that it would require a "complete rewrite of the gfortran backend" [1]. Now, I probably misinterpreted

On 9/6/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Michael McCracken wrote: [snip] > > ../../src/gcc/llvm-convert.cpp:3871: failed assertion > > `(TREE_CONSTANT(exp) || TREE_CODE(exp) == STRING_CST) && "Isn't a > > constant!"' > > > > In this case, TreeConstantToLLVM::Convert() is getting a constant to >