Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] JIT and array pointers"
2005 Apr 11
2
[LLVMdev] JIT and array pointers
On Sun, 2005-04-10 at 19:47 -0500, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Paul wrote:
> > I'm trying to pass an array pointer to my run-time generated module, and
> > after a long time of searching for the answer, the only thing I got was
> > a headache. Basically I have a few arrays (few megabytes which will
> > sometimes be accessed as 8 / 16 / 32 / 64 bit
2005 Apr 11
0
[LLVMdev] JIT and array pointers
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, dummy1 at boxpl.com wrote:
>> There are many possible ways to do this, can you be a bit more specific
>> about what you're trying to do?
> Here is a basic example:
Ah, ok, I see what you're trying to do. Below is some *pseudo* code for
the basic idea:
> ============================================
> unsigned int buff[4096];
>
> int main
2005 Apr 11
0
[LLVMdev] JIT and array pointers
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Paul wrote:
> I'm trying to pass an array pointer to my run-time generated module, and
> after a long time of searching for the answer, the only thing I got was
> a headache. Basically I have a few arrays (few megabytes which will
> sometimes be accessed as 8 / 16 / 32 / 64 bit binary / fp values), that
> will be modified by both the generated module, and my
2005 Mar 16
2
[LLVMdev] Dynamic Creation of a simple program
Hi Misha,
Thanks for your answer
I was doing this:
========================
BasicBlock *BBlock = new BasicBlock("entry", MyFunc);
...
Value *Zero = ConstantSInt::get(Type::IntTy, 0);
Value *UZero = ConstantUInt::get(Type::UIntTy, 0);
MallocInst* mi = new MallocInst( STyStru );
mi->setName("tmp.0");
BBlock->getInstList().push_back( mi );
2006 May 01
2
[LLVMdev] printf decleration
I am writing a pass where I need to make a function deceleration for
printf. Below is the code I'm trying to use.
-----
bool MyPass::runOnModule(Module &m) {
vector<const Type*> args;
args.push_back(PointerType::get(Type::SByteTy));
Function* f = m.getOrInsertFunction("printf",
FunctionType::get(Type::IntTy, args, true));
-----
When I insert a call
2006 Mar 02
4
[LLVMdev] Re: Re: New GCC4-based C/C++/ObjC front-end for LLVM
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, Vladimir Prus wrote:
>>> The instructions seem to have one path wrong. It says to get:
>>
>> I'll put together a tarball today. That will be easier than dealing with
>> a patch, and it will include a bunch of bugfixes since the previous email.
> Further into process, I get this error:
> In file included from
2006 Jun 25
1
[LLVMdev] adding args to func call
This question is similar to Ryan Lefever's post on May 1, 2006 about
printf declaration. In my case, I want to insert fprintf(stderr,
...) calls. I'm new to LLVM, and I don't know what's the recipe for
putting together the arguments. Can someone give me basic
instructions or point me in the direction on what to do? I can't find
any more documentation on this. Thanks!
2006 May 01
0
[LLVMdev] printf decleration
Ok, I think I figured it out. I talked to someone, and we figured out
that when I make a call to printf with a constant string, I need to make
a global variable and use getElementPtr to reference it. The modified
call for accessing the printf is:
/* m is Module*, f is Function*, i is Instruction* */
Constant* constStr = ConstantArray::get("test\n");
GlobalVariable* gv =
2005 Mar 16
1
[LLVMdev] Dynamic Creation of a simple program
Hi,
Given these C instructions:
==============================
struct stru { struct stru *Next; };
struct list *NewStru = malloc ( sizeof ( struct stru ) );
struct list *tmp.3;
...
tmp.3 = NewStru->Next;
==============================
LLVM generates something like this:
%tmp.0 = malloc %struct.stru ; <%struct.stru*>
%tmp.3 = getelementptr %struct.stru* %tmp.0, int 0, uint 1 ;
2010 Apr 13
1
Another newbie question on encoding
Hi,
I'm very sorry if those questions are repeated over and over, but I
cannot find a solution on the net.
I try to use speex to encode/decode voice to send over the network.
My doubts are:
1. The Bits_Per_Sample I use, are independent from the speex
encoding/decoding? (So...can I use 8, 16, 24..and so on?)
2. If I have this situation:
SAMPLE RATE.....: 8000
BITS PER SAMPLE.: 16
2005 Mar 21
3
[LLVMdev] arguments to standard library functions
HI ,
I understand that the standard C library functions are executed using the
native library of the host machine. ( for example when we execute a bytecode
to extract the profile info )
Is it possible to extract for each standard library function that is
executed , the arguments that the function is called with.
For example if printf ("%d", some_int ) when called during runtime
2002 Sep 25
3
[LLVMdev] question about GetElementPtr Instruction
I have a question about GetElementPtr.
Suppose I have an GetElementPtr Instruction GI:
%reg = getelementptr %ST* %s, uint 1, ubyte 2, ubyte 1, uint
5, uint 13
I want to check if this is the reference of a component of a
structure, how can I do that? Should I check which operand of
this instruction is 'ubyte' type? How can I do that in code?
should I use
ubyte *a =
2003 Jan 28
1
[LLVMdev] Building a new struct type, etc
Hi folks,
I was just wondering if someone would be willing to tell me the best way
to make a new structure type in LLVM and get it inserted as a valid type
into a particular Module instance?
I've done the following:
vector<const Type*> types;
types.push_back(Type::UIntTy);
types.push_back(Type::UIntTy);
structType = StructType::get(types);
But
2004 May 21
1
[LLVMdev] Re: LLVMdev digest, Vol 1 #292 - 4 msgs
Hi,
Thank Brian Gaeke so much.
Following TraceBasicBlocks.cpp, I modified the code as below and could insert instruction or function I need into anywhere in Module.
But it works well without BB->getInstList().push_back(InstrCall), and if I add the BB->getInstList().push_back() following new CallInst(), I got error information when runing opt. What is the reason for it? And is it necessary
2006 Jun 30
1
[LLVMdev] instruction sequence
I'm trying to insert a call to fprintf(stderr, ...). I've looked at
the emitted assembly from llvm-gcc, and it consists of a LoadInst (of
stderr) and CallInst. It looks like this:
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%tmp.1 = load %struct._IO_FILE** %stderr ; ty=%struct._IO_FILE*
%tmp.0 = call int (%struct._IO_FILE*, sbyte*, ...)* %fprintf(%struct._IO_FILE* %tmp.1, sbyte*
2002 Sep 22
2
[LLVMdev] Accessing constant indexes in GetElementPtr
Ok. Let's say I have a GetElementPtrInst that is used to access structure
elements. In this case the indexes will be constants and I want to get the
constant values as an a native C int.
Now I can iterate over all the indexes with idx_begin(). I can cast
all of the indexes to a ConstantIntegral. However, I cannot cast the
indexes to a ConstantSInt or ConstantUInt (cast<> throws an
2002 Sep 23
2
[LLVMdev] Accessing constant indexes in GetElementPtr
> Also sprach Wojciech Stryjewski:
> } Ok. Let's say I have a GetElementPtrInst that is used to access
> structure
> } elements. In this case the indexes will be constants and I want
> to get the
> } constant values as an a native C int.
> }
> } Now I can iterate over all the indexes with idx_begin(). I can cast
> } all of the indexes to a ConstantIntegral. However,
2004 Apr 05
1
[LLVMdev] Two important changes to the getelementptr instruction
On Sun, 4 Apr 2004, Reid Spencer wrote:
> Congrats on getting this taken care of finally. I know its something
> you've wanted to do since 1.0.
It certainly has been on the grand TODO list for a long time :)
> I have one question. How does LLVM disambiguate between a uint used for
> a structure and a uint used for an array?
It depends on the operand number of the
2007 Mar 07
1
[LLVMdev] UIntTy, IntTy, and SByteTy
I have llvm code that uses llvm::Type::UIntTy, llvm::Type::IntTy, and
llvm::Type::SByteTy, but these are now removed. What should I use for
their replacement. If I need to specify a size for IntTy and UIntTy, I
want them to be the same size that an integer would be in C on the
platform on which I'm compiling. So, if I need the sizes is their a way
to fetch the size that an integer
2006 Mar 03
0
[LLVMdev] Re: Re: New GCC4-based C/C++/ObjC front-end for LLVM
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, Chris Lattner wrote:
>> Any ideas what could be wrong?
>
> Sorry for the delay, please try this tarball:
> http://nondot.org/sabre/2006-03-02-llvm-gcc-4.tar.gz
Actually, do to a recent change in CVS, this tarball will probably not
work anymore. Please apply the attached (small) patch on top of it in
the gcc directory.
Worth noting, this front-end only works