similar to: [LLVMdev] Running Pool Allocated programs

On Sat, 2 Apr 2005, Ricardo wrote: > Hello, > I am trying to run a program optimized with the Pool Allocation, but I am receiving this error: > > ==================== > > *** 4 DYNAMIC POOLS INITIALIZED *** > > *** 4 DYNAMIC POOLS ALLOCATED FROM *** > > MaxHeapSize = 0.062500KB HeapSizeAtExit = 0.062500KB NOTE: only valid if using > Heuristic=AllPools and no

Thanks for the answer I am trying to test the PA with a program very similar to the one used as an example in the paper located here: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/pubs/2003-04-29-DataStructureAnalysisTR.html The program is as follows: ========================== struct list { struct list *Next; }; struct list *makeList (int Num) { struct list *New = malloc ( sizeof ( struct list ) );

On Sat, 2 Apr 2005, Ricardo wrote: > After applying the PA to it, the output is something like this: ... > My question is: why is this malloc necessary? > ltmp_2_5 = malloc(4u); > Shouldn't be the result a program with this malloc replaced by poolalloc? > Should I include a special flag to achieve this? Ah, sorry, my memory was wrong. The default is to perform the

Thanks Chris! That was causing me some confusion. Now it's producing a more meaningful output: poolinit((&l2_GlobalPool), 4u, 4u); poolinit((&l2_GlobalPool1), 4u, 4u); l5_tmp_2E_0_2E_i = poolalloc((&l2_GlobalPool), 4u); l6_tmp_2E_7_2E_i2 = l1_makeList((&l2_GlobalPool1), 0); *(&((struct l_struct_2E_list *)l5_tmp_2E_0_2E_i)->field0) = l6_tmp_2E_7_2E_i2;

Greetings. One for the developers I guess... I am having problems in using a (non-recommended) Fortran compiler (Salford ftn95 Windoze), and the crashes do seem to be associated with the ftn95-dervived DLL changing the Floating Point Control Word. The compiler people are suggesting (and I paraphrase!) that if R minds what the FPCW is it is up to R to make sure it is the value it wants and

>Message: 11 >Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 11:46:29 +0800 >From: "chris" <chris@fivestartel.com> >Subject: [Asterisk-Users] error compiling on solaris 10 >To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> >Message-ID: <003a01c5ab83$149a9e30$650fa8c0@acid> >Content-Type: text/plain;

Hi all, I just ran into a strange problem. When using the Equivalence-class Bottom-up Data Structure Analysis pass and pool allocation, I noticed some objects using different pool descriptors where I expected them to be in the same pool. We use svn revision 66285 of the DSA. The following 2 programs expose the problem. First the version that runs correctly, ie. producing a single DSNode.

[Q.] How to create an array of lists, or structures the most elegant way? There have been questions in the past but none too recently...I want to know if the following looks OK to you guys or if there is a better way to create an array of lists: # PREAMBLE ... JUST TO GET THINGS GOING makeList<- function(data, anythingElse) { rval <- list( data = data, anythingElse =

Hi, I am trying to use the poolallocator. More specific, I am trying to play around with the pointer compression pass. Though, I get assertion failures for the pass dependencies. This is when it in PointerCompress::getAnalysisUsage tries to register the the BU pass as required. I.e. when AU.addRequired<CompleteBUDataStructures>(); is called. $ opt -f -load

Hi all, I too am getting this error for x86_64 when I am trying to use the Data Structure Analysis ...I svn upped both the llvm main branch and the poolalloc today in the morning and recompiled everything from scratch : $ opt -load /home/pprabhu/llvm/llvm-install-x86-64/lib/libpoolalloc.so -ds-aa < o.bc opt: /home/pprabhu/llvm/llvm/lib/VMCore/PassManager.cpp:1418: virtual void

Dear R users, I wish to utilise processed and saved objects as arguments of a function. Specifically, I have created objects using *"assign"* & *"paste"* functions with an incremental index i, the names of the objects are: fund1, fund2, fund3,....., fund80,..... (where the numerical value increments according to the index i & class of these objects are

Dear Prakash, Yes, DSA is still in active use, although nobody else uses the -ds-aa pass as far as I know. I tried the below sample (although ds-aa should be in libLLVMDataStructure.so and not libpoolalloc.so), and I get the same error. I've seen similar problems with other passes in our work here. My guess is that -ds-aa is requiring two passes that claim to invalidate each other; this

Dear Prakash, I believe I've fixed the problem you were having with ds-aa. Please update your poolalloc tree, recompile, and let me know if it works. -- John T. Criswell, John T wrote: > [snip] > > ________________________________________ > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Prakash Prabhu [prakash.prabhu at gmail.com] > Sent:

Hi All, I am trying to get Asterisk up and running on my new Mandrake 9.1 install. I've installed Linux in the "standard" mandrake security mode, and "su" to do my attempts at install. I managed to obtain the source from CVS, and have been able to compile Zaptel. I then ran insmod zaptel, and also make config. I think I have compiled and loaded Zaptel successfully as

Chris Lattner wrote: > Here's a new snapshot of the front-end: > http://nondot.org/sabre/2006-03-14-llvm-gcc-4.tar.gz > > This: > > 1. Fixes the inline asm problem you have above. > 2. Includes patches to make it better on Alpha's (thanks to patches by > Andrew Lenharth). > 3. Sync's it up with debug info changes in LLVM CVS (by Jim Laskey). > 4.

On Wed, 15 Mar 2006, Vladimir Prus wrote: >> Please give it a try and let me know if it works any better for you! > > Here we go: Wow, you are good at finding problems! Thanks! > -fvisibility=hidden -DHIDE_EXPORTS > -c ../../2006-03-14-llvm-gcc-4/gcc/libgcc2.c -o libgcc/./_fixunsxfdi.o > cc1: /space/p2/ghost/build/llvm-cvs/include/llvm/Instructions.h:72: void >

>> Sorry for the delay, please try this tarball: >> http://nondot.org/sabre/2006-03-02-llvm-gcc-4.tar.gz > > There's some confusion with --enable-llvm configure parameter. I've built > LLVM to a separate build dir. The source is ~ghost/Work/llvm-cvs and build > dir is /space/p2/ghost/build/llvm-cvs ... > So, it seems like, at the same time: > > 1. buildir

Trying to build asterisk 1.6.0-rc3, it fails with this message: make[2]: Entering directory `/home/fhimpe/rpm/BUILD/asterisk-1.6.1.0-rc3/ main/editline' /bin/sh makelist -h common.c > common.h /bin/sh makelist -h emacs.c> emacs.h /bin/sh makelist -h vi.c > vi.h /bin/sh makelist -fh common.h emacs.h vi.h > fcns.h /bin/sh makelist -fc common.h emacs.h vi.h > fcns.c if uname -s |

Hallo. I wanted to use the DSA from the poolalloc project as a starting point for static C code analysis (for me it has some benefits to work on LLVM-IR (generated by clang) instead of C code). Currently there is no poolalloc version 3.3. Therefore I wrote a quick patch to make poolalloc 3.2 compile with llvm 3.3 (mostly adaptions to file relocations were necessary). The patch is attached as

Hello, I'm trying to compile and install R for my user in a machine without admin privileges. I have done this before, so this is fine. But I have 2 problems with R compilation right now. After ./configure --prefix=/home/me/dir/ I get this: ================================ R is now configured for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Source directory: . Installation directory: