similar to: [LLVMdev] arguments to standard library functions

Right now I am trying to capture the function name and the number of arguments , so this following is the pass I wrote . ------------------------------------------------------------- struct pass06a : public ModulePass { virtual bool runOnModule(Module &M) { std::vector<const Type*> pList; pList.push_back( PointerType::get(Type::SByteTy) ); pList.push_back(

Hi, I am writing C++ functions that are to be called via .Call() interface. I'd been using error() (from R.h) to return to R if there is an error, but then I realized that this might be not safe as supposedly error() doesn't throw an exception and therefore some destructors do not get called and some memory may leak. Here is a simple example extern "C" void foo() { string

Hello, The e1071 function naiveBayes gives an error when called by do.call, although it doesn't give any error if I call it manually. Browse[1]> trainParams at classifier function (x, ...) UseMethod("naiveBayes") <environment: namespace:e1071> Browse[1]> trained <- do.call(trainParams at classifier, paramList) Error in names(dimnames(tables[[i]])) <- c(Yname,

When creating an Ajax.Request(''/path.xml'') i don''t get responseXML. I''m confused what I am doing wrong. If i change the response variable and dump responseText, it shows the file, it just doesn''t recognize it as xml. function xml(url){ new Ajax.Request(url, { method: ''post'', parameters:''resultSet=simcall'',

Hi, I have question again about modifiers for pattern parameters. Vedant suggested such way. > CHECK-DEFINE-PATTERN: one_or_more(x): x {{+}} But I have some doubts. This should be equal to x+. This approach differs from standard one. In FileCheck I can write CHECK: {{x|y}}{{something}} This line will be equal to regex (x|y)(something). But if I use suggested approach and write same

Hi all, I can get access to the data stored in globals as follows: GlobalVariable* pGvarAct=_set_a_valid_global_; const_ptr_indicesVec=_the_indexes_ llvm::Constant* pConst; pConst=ConstantExpr::getGetElementPtr(pGvarAct, const_ptr_indicesVec); and e.g. use this to repalece an argumrnt of an instruction like: I->setOperand(someArgumentIndex,pConst); However, getGetElementPtr returns a

getInitializer returns the complete initializer of the global. My globals are complex nested structs, from which I want to extract e.g. one double datafield. Example: >From a struct Stuct having double,array(3xint),float fields, I could extract the second int value using the index sequence 0,1,1 with getGetElementPtr. This gives me a constantPointer, but I would need to get a constInt...

> On Aug 24, 2016, at 4:46 PM, Vedant Kumar via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> >> On Aug 24, 2016, at 2:04 AM, Elena Lepilkina <Elena.Lepilkina at synopsys.com> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Some discussions and comments were made in reviews. Much time has already passed since last comment and uploading changed patches. I

Hi, I want to convert LLVM bitcode files to cpp. I use these commands: 1. clang -c -emit-llvm -fopenmp=libiomp5 oh2.c -o oh2.bc2. llc -march=cpp oh2.bc -o oh2.cpp3. g++ -fno-rtti -O0 -g `$HOME/llvmbuild/bin/llvm-config --cxxflags` oh2.cpp `$HOME/llvmbuild/bin/llvm-config --ldflags --libs --system-libs` -o oh2c After the 3rd command, I get a lot of compilation errors. Is it possible that llc

John, you are right. I 'browsed' the doxygen's inheritance diagram. Shouldn't I then be able to cast Constant * to Value*? Plugging the retrieved Constant* (from ConstantExpr::getGetElementPtr) into Instruction->setOperand compiles, but gives me an assertion failure at runtime. I have no access to the code at the moment. I will gather more information possibly tomorrow.

于 2011/5/18 14:29, Duncan Sands 写道: > Hi Tan Guangming, > >> I want to access an array in my instrumentation code. For example: >> >> GlobalVariable: >> int *counter; //counter the number of load/store operations in run-time >> int *counterArray; //record the load/store addresses > strictly speaking these are not arrays, they are pointers. Also, you have

Hi, I want to access an array in my instrumentation code. For example: GlobalVariable: int *counter; //counter the number of load/store operations in run-time int *counterArray; //record the load/store addresses //increase the counter if a load/store is performed std::vector<Constant *>index(2); index[0] = Constant::getNullvalue(Type:getInt32Ty(Context)); index[1] =

Evening, I was writing some code that tried to insert calls to the llvm.annotation intrinsic function, which has a signature of (i32, i8*, i8*, i32). The code is below. void addAnnotation( BasicBlock *block, Function *F) { string foo = "foo"; string bar = "barr"; Type *charTy = Type::getInt8Ty(block->getContext()); ArrayType *s1Ty =

Hi, I have this call instruction to printf inserted which is causing an assertion failure. Any pointers to where I am wrong : Code Dump : Function *printFn=M.getNamedFunction(std::string("printf")); Constant *str=ConstantArray::get("Value : %d\n"); std::vector<Value *> Args(2); std::vector<Constant *> GEPIndices(2);

I wanted to start making some change. But I thought and I don't understand why it's necessary to add @. // RUN: FileCheck %s // CHECK-DEFINE-PATERN: register(n): {{[a-z]+}}n // CHECK: %[[register("1")]] // CHECK-SAME: %[[register("2")]] // CHECK: %[[register("1")]] // CHECK-SAME: %[[register("2")]] This example will be equivalent to // RUN:

I notice that there's a lot of inconsistency in the various LLVM classes with respect to convenience methods. Here's some examples: For creating GEPS, IRBuilder has: CreateGEP (2 overloads) CreateInBoundsGEP (2 overloads) CreateConstGEP1_32 CreateConstInBoundsGEP1_32 CreateConstGEP2_32 CreateConstInBoundsGEP2_32 CreateConstGEP1_64 CreateConstInBoundsGEP1_64

Ok, when I change syntax I will load new patch. Thanks, Elena. -----Original Message----- From: vsk at apple.com [mailto:vsk at apple.com] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2016 9:38 PM To: Elena Lepilkina <Elena.Lepilkina at synopsys.com> Cc: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com>; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] RFC: FileCheck Enhancements It is necessary to be

Hi all, translating the following c code to llvm c++Api code, I can not understand the result. Perhaps someone could explain it to me. c code --------------------------------- struct stest { int age; float weight; } foo={44,67.2}; int main() { foo.weight=68.2; ... ---------------------------------------- API code // this is clear ConstantFP* const_float_102 =

Hi all, extracting datafields of globals, the API code ends up in a Constant * Constant* const_ptr_103 = ConstantExpr::getGetElementPtr(gvar_struct_foo, const_ptr_103_indices); it can be used to initialize e.g. a new instruction like: StoreInst* void_119 = new StoreInst(const_float_102, const_ptr_103, false, label_entry_113); But how about replacing the operand of an already existing

Hi Guangming Tan, >>> GlobalVariable: >>> int *counter; //counter the number of load/store operations in run-time >>> int *counterArray; //record the load/store addresses >> strictly speaking these are not arrays, they are pointers. Also, you have >> written them in some kind of C-style idiom. What are the declarations in >> LLVM IR? > const Type