similar to: [LLVMdev] llvm assembler documentation -- where?

This was the default version I got from public cvs last week. On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 03:44:19 -0600 (CST), Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Valery Khamenya wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > maybe it is of interest for someone: > > I successfully compiled llvm and gcc front-end sources at Gentoo Linux > > (even on exotic

Hi all maybe it is of interest for someone: I successfully compiled llvm and gcc front-end sources at Gentoo Linux (even on exotic x86-compatible CPU). Things seem to be running OK. This is a good prerequisite for making llvm ebuild script and promote llvm to hackers of fast-growing progressive Gentoo world. -- Valery A.Khamenya

Hi all, web-browser access to cvs is of course nice, but is it possible to provide anonymous read-only access to llvm cvs? (it would be nice to have an ability just download last sources) P.S. BTW, this and previous my post were actually motivated by desire to find some simple example on JIT usage :) --- Valery A.Khamenya

Building PowerPC.td register information header with tblgen Included from PowerPC.td:22: Parsing PowerPCInstrInfo.td:53: Variable not defined: 'GPRC'! make[3]: *** [PowerPCGenRegisterInfo.h.inc] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/pool/tmp/ssrc/llvm/lib/Target/PowerPC' maybe I just have to "make clean" and/or ./configure BTW, would it be nice to put Depend, Release and

Valery A.Khamenya wrote: >>For example: >>$ llvmgcc ackerman.c -o ackerman -Wl,-native-cbe > > > BTW, Chris, what should be then an analogy > of "gcc -O3 -S foo.c" in LLVM framework? > > The invocation of > > $ llvmgcc -S ackerman.c -o ackerman -Wl,-native-cbe > > does not produce native assebler output as one might expect.

On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Valery Khamenya wrote: > Hi all > > maybe it is of interest for someone: > I successfully compiled llvm and gcc front-end sources at Gentoo Linux > (even on exotic x86-compatible CPU). Things seem to be running OK. > > This is a good prerequisite for making llvm ebuild script and promote llvm > to hackers of fast-growing progressive Gentoo world.

Hi all, compilation of package llvm-1.0.tar.gz under redhat 9 is failed with following output: ------- make[3]: *** No rule to make target `/home/vak/llvm/llvm/runtime/GCCLibraries/crtend/BytecodeObj/C++-Exception.bc', needed by `/home/vak/llvm/llvm/lib/BytecodeLibs/libcrtend.bc'. Stop. make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/vak/llvm/llvm/runtime/GCCLibraries/crtend' ...skipped -------

On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Valery A.Khamenya wrote: > Hello Reid and LLVMers, > 10. Basic support for distributed computations. What kind of support? What do you think should be included in LLVM directly, as opposed to being built on top of it? -Chris -- http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/ http://www.nondot.org/~sabre/Projects/

Hi, where could one find any LLVM development roadmap for this and perhaps next year? Especially would be interesting to know about * planned features for PS3 Cell processor -- as well as for Wii, Xbox360 CPUs * multithreading in general * possibly coming changes in major versioning and related issues * other interesting featuring comments on current status to above listed items are also

Hi Valery On 13 September 2010 19:07, Valery Khamenya <khamenya at gmail.com> wrote: > are there any attempts to use LLVM in graph-rewriting (term-rewriting) > language implementations? I've added a new LLVM backend to the ghc Haskell compiler. > How good is LLVM for this? Works very well. I'm operating from the low levels of the ghc compiler though where I don't

Hi all, Here: http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2003-October/000523.html Chris wrote: Chris> We certainly acknowledge that CVS has severe Chris> deficiencies, but in the near future we'll probably stay with it. Chris> Perhaps after SVN 1.0 comes out... :) so, now it is: http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ProjectNewsList ;-) P.S. any March LLVM news? best

Valery, That's pretty cute actually. Do you want this "brilliant" :) example in the cvs repository? I'd be happy to put it in. Reid. Valery A.Khamenya wrote: > Hi LLVMers, > > the example attached I have used to prove that JIT and some visible > optimizations are really invoked. > > Proved OK. I got 30% speed-up in comparison to gcc 3.3.3 >

On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > That's pretty cute actually. Do you want this "brilliant" :) example in the cvs > repository? I'd be happy to put it in. Here's an idea: how about we take the ModuleMaker, Valery's previous example, and this one and put them all in one "small examples" project? -Chris > Valery A.Khamenya wrote: > >

Hi all, (thanks to Reid, who gave nice advice) the fibonacci function code works now. Please find attached file. but... the performance is adequate, say, for byte-code interpretation mode and not for optimized JITing. fibonacci function of 35 from attached file is more then 100 times slower then the following code compiled with "gcc -O2" : ----------- #include <iostream> int

Hi LLVMers, the example attached I have used to prove that JIT and some visible optimizations are really invoked. Proved OK. I got 30% speed-up in comparison to gcc 3.3.3 on my Athlon XP 1500. Nice. P.S. guys, no fears, I don't plan to flood the cvs repository with my "brilliant" examples ;) --- Valery A.Khamenya -------------- next part -------------- An

On second thought, the makefiles don't (easily) allow this do they? You can only build one program per directory. Were you suggesting that you wanted me to move the entire directories under a "small examples" directory? Reid. Chris Lattner wrote: > On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > > >>That's pretty cute actually. Do you want this

On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Valery A.Khamenya wrote: > just imagine, that we have Linux cluster, and we have two functions in > one module (`f' and `g'). If they are about to be executed at one host, > then one is allowed to do very aggressive interprocedural > optimizations between these `f' and `g'. However if `g' should be > "outsourced to" (i.e.

Hello Reid and LLVMers, ... 10. Basic support for distributed computations. -- Best regards, Valery A.Khamenya mailto:khamenya at mail.ru Local Time: 19:48

Hello Chris, >> 10. Basic support for distributed computations. CL> What kind of support? What do you think should be included in LLVM CL> directly, as opposed to being built on top of it? nice question :) (don't sue me, I am far from being expert like you are!) just imagine, that we have Linux cluster, and we have two functions in one module (`f' and `g'). If they

Hello Chris, Sunday, October 26, 2003, 8:06:03 PM, you wrote: CL> Makes sure that you have the C front-end installed correctly, and that CL> the configure script found it (you have to provide the path to the C CL> frontend to the configure script). hm... why cross-dependency?.. I thought llvm itself doesn't use cfront-end. P.S. Chris, I guess you know, but to be sure: your