Displaying 20 results from an estimated 500 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Errors building llvm with Visual Studio in Debug mode"
2005 Mar 10
0
[LLVMdev] Errors building llvm with Visual Studio in Debug mode
It compiles successfully with VC++ 7.1. You are apparently using VC++
8.0, otherwise known as the Whidbey beta. The cause is no doubt due to
bugs in Whidbey and this isn't the first one encountered. I'm sorry,
but I cannot support beta Microsoft products (if only because I refuse
to have them anywhere near my computer). All I can suggest is that you
do a 'clean solution'
2010 Sep 07
3
[LLVMdev] MS VS2008 build fails - X86AsmParser
Hi all,
Just tried to build from svn sources with Visual Studio 2008, mostly
OK but fails
building the X86AsmParser lib -
I see a few commits from yesterday that may have something to do with it, but no
idea what the solution is.
-David
See MSVC's beautiful and concise output below;
Compiling...
X86AsmParser.cpp
C:\dev\MSVisualStudio\VC\include\xutility(313) : error C2664: 'bool
2010 Sep 07
0
[LLVMdev] MS VS2008 build fails - X86AsmParser
On Sep 6, 2010, at 10:50 PM, David Shipman wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just tried to build from svn sources with Visual Studio 2008, mostly
> OK but fails
> building the X86AsmParser lib -
>
> I see a few commits from yesterday that may have something to do with it, but no
> idea what the solution is.
Wow, that's a pretty terrible diagnostic. Does r113198 help?
-Chris
2011 Mar 09
0
[LLVMdev] Unable to build latest with Visual Studio 2008
Hello,
I've been building Clang under Windows 7 and Visual Studio 2008 for a while
now, but had not touched it in a few months. Last night I wiped my build tree
to do a full rebuild with the latest version, and got the identical error as
David Shipman was seeing last September. Are others able to build under VS9
right now?
Thanks,
John
> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] MS VS2008 build fails -
2007 Jul 27
2
[LLVMdev] Couple of changes (2005 and other toolchain related)
Hi,
I upgraded the Visual Studio SLN file to work with 2005 and had to make some
changes.
The first two have to do with the fact that the debug implementation of 2005's
STL does all sort of validation, that's why they didnt show up on 2003.
I'm not set up for patch submission yet, but if somebody has time to review
these changes that'd be greatly appreciated.
Meanwhile
2015 Mar 09
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.6: problems building on Windows using MSVC 2013
Hi,
I have been using LLVM+Clang in my project for some time and it has been
working just fine up to now (I am currently using version 3.5.1).
However, with version 3.6 having just been released, I thought I would give
it a try and update my code to use MCJIT rather than the now discontinued
JIT. Well, this proved to be a relatively smooth process, and everything is
now working fine on
2015 Mar 09
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.6: problems building on Windows using MSVC 2013
Sorry, I am using CMake+JOM or CMake+Ninja, if Ninja is available on the developer’s machine. Either way, it fails in both cases with a message similar to the one I included below (which was obtained using CMake+Ninja).
Just in case, my (current) CMakeLists.txt file can be found at here
2013 Jul 04
4
[LLVMdev] llvm (hence Clang) not compiling with Visual Studio 2008
Hello,
I have just updated my svn copy of the llvm/clang repositories after quite
a long time of inactivity, and found it not compiling on Windows with
Visual Studio 2008.
The incriminated file is:
llvm/lib/MC/MCModule.cpp
Where several calls to "std::lower_bound" are made, like:
atom_iterator I = std::lower_bound(atom_begin(), atom_end(),
2007 Nov 12
1
[LLVMdev] MSVC 8 Build
Hi,
I had to add an include statement for the math header to
LiveIntervalAnalysis.h to get it to compile today e.g
#ifndef LLVM_CODEGEN_LIVEINTERVAL_ANALYSIS_H
#define LLVM_CODEGEN_LIVEINTERVAL_ANALYSIS_H
#include <math.h>
It seems then to work without failures; odd.
However, the deprecation warnings are not suppressed for std::_Uninit_Copy
and std::_Copy_Opt (warning 4996) in xutility
2012 Aug 09
1
[LLVMdev] Type inconsistency in LLVM 3.1: CGDebugInfo.cpp
Hi Ben,
Thanks that helped a lot.
The problem seems to be that with the move to C++11 we now have:
void std::vector<_Ty>::push_back(std::pair<_Ty1,_Ty2> &&)'
and there no conversion operator that can be applied to convert:
'std::pair<_Ty1,_Ty2>' to 'std::pair<_Ty3,_Ty4> &&
Where:
[
_Ty1=void *,
2017 Apr 10
2
clang build failures using Visual Studio
Anyone run into this before?
I'm trying to get a Windows native build using Visual Studio of LLVM,
Clang, and LLD 4.0.0. So far LLVM built successfully, but I'm getting these
cryptic error messages when building Clang:
Microsoft (R) Build Engine version 15.1.1012.6693
Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
ClangDiagnosticsEmitter.cpp
c:\program files
2012 Aug 09
0
[LLVMdev] Type inconsistency in LLVM 3.1: CGDebugInfo.cpp
On 09.08.2012, at 19:43, "Gaster, Benedict" <Benedict.Gaster at amd.com> wrote:
> I’m probably missing something simple here but in:
>
> CGDebugInfo.h:
>
> std::vector<std::pair<void *, llvm::WeakVH> >ReplaceMap;
>
> but then in
>
> CGDebugInfo.cpp:
>
> llvm::DIType TC = getTypeOrNull(Ty);
>
> void * v =
2012 Aug 09
3
[LLVMdev] Type inconsistency in LLVM 3.1: CGDebugInfo.cpp
I'm probably missing something simple here but in:
CGDebugInfo.h:
std::vector<std::pair<void *, llvm::WeakVH> >ReplaceMap;
but then in
CGDebugInfo.cpp:
llvm::DIType TC = getTypeOrNull(Ty);
void * v = Ty.getAsOpaquePtr();
std::pair<void *, llvm::WeakVH> tmp = std::make_pair(v, TC);
if (TC.Verify() && TC.isForwardDecl())
2014 Aug 01
2
[LLVMdev] Clang Integration with MSVS 2013
I just installed the pre-compiled binaries for Clang 3.4.1, which was the
latest version I could find to download. Starting a new 'blank' project in
MSVC I was easily able to change the tool set from MS Visual Studio 2013
(v120) to LLVM-vs2013.
However, trying to compile a simple 'hello world' program resulted in the
following compiler errors. Is there something simple I am
2007 Jul 27
0
[LLVMdev] Couple of changes (2005 and other toolchain related)
Hola Jaap,
I'm curious which version of the source are you working with? It sounds
like you and I were working on the same problem yesterday, but I didn't
see those particular compiler errors. (I saw a couple of other ones for
which I submitted a patch).
I did see errors like the ones you saw with the CVS LLVM 2.0 sources a
while back, namely the missing < operator and the debug STL
2007 Nov 12
0
[LLVMdev] MSVC 8 Build
George,
> I have been experimenting with getting LLVM to build with
> MSVC8 express.
>
> I have succeeded in getting trunk to build and run the
> Fibonacci example in release mode. I have found various minor
> problems with the build system. First, it appears not to be
> able to run the configure subproject commands if there is a
> space in the directory path.
2007 Nov 11
2
[LLVMdev] MSVC 8 Build
Hi all,
I have been experimenting with getting LLVM to build with MSVC8 express.
I have succeeded in getting trunk to build and run the Fibonacci example in
release mode. I have found various minor problems with the build system.
First, it appears not to be able to run the configure subproject commands
if there is a space in the directory path.
Secondly, it fails to build different subprojects
2008 Dec 05
2
[LLVMdev] Build errors on trunk for about a week now.
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 6:38 AM, Cédric Venet <cedric.venet at laposte.net> wrote:
> should be fixed with r60590 (work for me)
That seems to have fixed a large amount of those errors (nicely simple
fix). I went ahead and termserved into my dev box (I will not be able
to get to it for another day or so) and told svn to update, and cmake
to make into a new directory, and build it, but it
2012 Jun 24
2
[LLVMdev] Problems building LLVM under Visual Studio
Hi all,
I'm trying to build LLVM, synced from SVN trunk yesterday.
I ran CMake and it generated VS 2008 project files, so far so good. Then I tried to build them, by building the ALL_BUILD project.
It got the first three all right, but choked on template issues in LLVMCore:
1>------ Build started: Project: LLVMCore, Configuration: Debug Win32 ------
1>Compiling...
1>Verifier.cpp
2007 May 31
0
[LLVMdev] Advice on a VStudio specific patch
On Thu, 31 May 2007, Chuck Rose III wrote:
> Our project is cross platform and on Windows we use VStudio 2005.
> VStudio presents a couple of issues related around it's STL
> implementation and also it's non-respect for the no-return semantic of
> abort().
Ok. We want the source to be portable, so it's goodness to get these
fixes into the main tree.
> I've fixed