similar to: [LLVMdev] Fix assert text in Constants.cpp

----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Lattner" <sabre at nondot.org> To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 6:31 PM Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Recursive Types using the llvm support library > On Tue, 8 Mar 2005, Vladimir Merzliakov wrote: > >>>> An example where something really simple like the

Just for information. After root update OS from FreeBSD 5.1 to FreeBSD 5.3-RC1 at make.cc.rsu.ru I don't rebuild LLVM C Frontend. Last LLVM build fail (2004-10-30) is result this situation. I update LLVM C Frontend and rerun manually nighttest script. All ok now :) Also, I think, "X86: FreeBSD 5.1 (may not be run every day)" line at

>> An example where something really simple like the line below was output >> would be perfect. >> >> %struct.linked_list = type { %struct.linked_list*, %sbyte* } > > Use something like this: > > PATypeHolder StructTy = OpaqueType::get(); > std::vector<const Type*> Elts; > Elts.push_back(PointerType::get(StructTy)); >

Commit http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20040830/017889.html break build llvm at FreeBSD: Compiling PPC32AsmPrinter.cpp /home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/src/llvm/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPC32AsmPrinter.cpp: In member function `virtual bool<unnamed>::AIXAsmPrinter::doFinalization(llvm::Module&)':

Result night tester run at FreeBSD 5.1 accessable by URL http://npt.cc.rsu.ru/testresults-X86-FreeBSD/index.html I can't guaranty run it per day base, sorry. As i can see, make (bug 385) and perl (bug 386) not builded by NightlyTest.pl (but builded if use gmake night tests run format) So I don't known preferable solutions: its can be closed or patches applied. Vladimir

In current state dates at small version of pictures generated by night builder script is unreadable ( for example http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/testresults/X86/running_loc.png ). I suggest rotate it to vertical position in small picture versions. .png file created modified gnuplot script (for comparing) and patch attached. "set xlabel 0,-1 " added for solving xlabel and xtics text overlap

On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> wrote: On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> wrote: > How do you determine if a shift is signed or not? > > ashr = always signed? Essentially, yes. > lshr = always unsigned? Essentially, yes. > shl = always signed? Signed left shift and unsigned left shift are both

Previously we'd end up with an unnecessary mov for the thirs immediate value. total instructions in shared programs : 851881 -> 851864 (-0.00%) total gprs used in shared programs : 110295 -> 110295 (0.00%) total local used in shared programs : 1020 -> 1020 (0.00%) local gpr inst bytes helped 0 0 17 17

On Tue, 8 Mar 2005, Vladimir Merzliakov wrote: >>> An example where something really simple like the line below was output >>> would be perfect. >>> >>> %struct.linked_list = type { %struct.linked_list*, %sbyte* } >> >> Use something like this: >> >> PATypeHolder StructTy = OpaqueType::get(); >> std::vector<const

How do you determine if a shift is signed or not? ashr = always signed? lshr = always unsigned? shl = always signed? The CmpInst has the "isSigned()" function, but it appears that every other Instruction I've looked at doesn't seem to have this. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, Clang crashes when below snippet of code is compiled (used latest svn version) *double func1() { double x ;* * asm ( "" : "=r"(x) : "0"(x) ); return x; }* > *clang -S test1.c* > *Assertion failed: (PartVT.isInteger() || PartVT == MVT::x86mmx) && ValueVT.isInteger() && "Unknown mismatch!", file

how does llvm decide when to use unsigned instructions then? such as unsigned adds and loads? I'm trying to describe some multiply shift ops and getting a bit stuck differentiating between signed and unsigned. sam Eli Friedman-2 wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Ryan Taylor <ryta1203

Hi! I can't build LLVM using GCC 4.1 (GCC CVS mainline) after http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20050328/025003.html Build terminated with error: /home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/src/llvm/lib/Target/SparcV9/ModuloScheduling/DependenceAnalyzer.cpp:25: error: explicit qualification in declaration of `llvm::FunctionPass* llvm::createDependenceAnalyzer()' at line:

Evan Cheng wrote: > I don't think so. Contribution welcome! :-) LLVM debugging support > isn't anywhere near where it needs to be. > Well, here's a rough sketch of what I was thinking of: class DebugInfoBuilder { public: /// Constructor DebugInfoBuilder(); /// Return the type defined by llvm.dbg.anchor.type StructType * GetAnchorType() const; ///

Hello. After llvm-java front-end compilation under cygwin I have encountered with the problem. Compilation successfully complete but the assertion message displayed while running application class2llvm.exe. C:\SRC_CVS\COPY\llvm\tools\llvm-java\Debug\bin>class2llvm.exe assertion "Ty->isInteger() && Ty->isSigned() && "Illegal type for signed integer

On Fri, 25 Jun 2004, Vladimir Merzliakov wrote: > Result night tester run at FreeBSD 5.1 accessable by URL > http://npt.cc.rsu.ru/testresults-X86-FreeBSD/index.html > I can't guaranty run it per day base, sorry. Okay, sounds great. I added it to the page with a note to that effect: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/testresults/ Thanks a lot for volenteering to run it. Also, if you notice

Hello, I have just downloaded the source from CVS. Does exist a LLVM Java front-end? If yes, where can I find documentations about it? If no, is anyway somebody working on it? Where can I find the source code related? Thanks, Alessandro

> Do to popular request, I just set up a new mailing list to capture the > nightly tester output from the various testers running 'round the world. > The new list is available here: > http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-testresults > > If you're running a nightly tester, please update your crontab to send > mail to the llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu list

I reported http://llvm.org/pr14393 to track it. On 20 November 2012 05:18, rajesh viswabramana <viswabramana.rajesh at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Clang crashes when below snippet of code is compiled (used latest svn > version) > > double func1() > { > double x ; > asm ( "" : "=r"(x) : "0"(x) ); > return x; > } >

On 02.10.2016 20:03, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Tobias Klausmann > <tobias.johannes.klausmann at mni.thm.de> wrote: >> Previously we'd end up with an unnecessary mov for the thirs immediate value. >> >> total instructions in shared programs : 851881 -> 851864 (-0.00%) >> total gprs used in shared programs : 110295 -> 110295