similar to: [LLVMdev] making cygwin nightly builds available?

Hi Marshall, LLVM *is* cool .. just not on cygwin! :) Sorry for the sad state of the cygwin build. I had hoped to have it cleaned up by now but many other things have been taking my time. Although the build has been succeeding in recent days, I'm not sure it will buy you anything. NONE of the nightly tests pass on cygwin. Until I can get some time to figure out why that is happening, I doubt

On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:14:41 -0800, Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > > Sorry for the sad state of the cygwin build. I had hoped to have it > cleaned up by now but many other things have been taking my time. > Although the build has been succeeding in recent days, I'm not sure it > will buy you anything. NONE of the nightly tests pass on cygwin. <ulp!>

Marshall Spight wrote: >>FYI, work progresses on the Win32 native port which you might also find >>interesting. It might even get done before the cygwin stuff. Jeff Cohen >>is working on that. Perhaps he can indicate the status of that effort. >> >> > >I recall reading on the llvm archives somewhere that there are significant >performance issues with the

You know what I would really love? I set of pre-built llvm binaries. Either for Windows or RedHat. IIUC, the cygwin nightly build hasn't succeeded since March, and the latest download on illuvium.net predates that. I'd love to be able to try out 1.6, but having to build my own compiler to build it is a substantial barrier. I know there are binaries for the gcc frontend, which is cool, but

Hi, What's the state of llvm on various platforms? I've tried working with it on windows/cygwin a few times, and been fairly frustrated. I made some abortive efforts on RedHat 9, which also didn't go so well, but I put much less time into them. Is there a plan or a timeline to end up with some low-intensity linux target? Sort of like: grab these three RPMs and go. Having to get my

I'm building on cygwin. But the procedure for building the front-end on Cygwin is a bit daunting, to say the least,. Does anyone know a source for a pre-built version of the same?

>From: "Robin Davies" <rerdavies at rogers.com> > >I'm building on cygwin. But the procedure for building the front-end on >Cygwin is a bit daunting, to say the least,. > >Does anyone know a source for a pre-built version of the same? > To my knowledge there is no pre-built version of the cfe. However, if you like I can give you the build instructions.

>>Does anyone know a source for a pre-built version of the same? > >To my knowledge there is no pre-built version of the cfe. See following link for CFE :- http://illuvium.com/download/ It maybe a bit out of date. I believe the CFE maybe broken at the moment, at least the Cygwin nightly test reports that it is broken and I believe this is the same thing ?

Hello, Reid. You wrote Friday, January 21, 2005, 11:14:41 PM: RS> FYI, work progresses on the Win32 native port which you might also find RS> interesting. It might even get done before the cygwin stuff. Jeff Cohen RS> is working on that. Perhaps he can indicate the status of that effort. There is too much work to do native Win32 builds. I've tried to get llvm compiled on mingw32

There do not seem to be any binaries for CygWin only Linux and the Mac :( I tried building the frontend on CygWin but ended up with a makeinfo error then a build error that I could not do anything about. I will have to get my Linux Laptop from home and use that. Many thanks, Aaron

Yeah, cygwin is a bit of a beast. There's no pre-compiled binary available (I'm working on it). If you want to build yourself, follow the instructions in the CFEBuildInstr.html document carefully, especially noting the Cygwin specific stuff. For example, you can't use the default gcc that comes with Cygwin. I've been successful with GCC 3.4.3 on Cygwin. I've uploaded a

>> In other words, abandoning overflow detection makes the >> duplication of types redundant, while requiring it would be a >> great burden on CPUs that don't have overflow exception hardware. > >Yes, you're right. This has been a desired change for quite some time >now. Unfortunately, its a huge impact to nearly every part of LLVM. We >will

Hi Anton, You're already a part of the llvm development team by participating actively on the llvm development list :) If you wish we can put you on: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/Developers.html Great to have you on the team, welcome! We (Jeff, Morten, Paolo, the rest of the team and I) are looking forward to cooperate with you and to push win32 and mingw versions even further to stable and

Hello, Jeff. You wrote Saturday, January 22, 2005, 3:57:28 AM: JC> Reid, the binary/text mode is a valid issue. This set of flags worked for me: std::ios_base::out | std::ios_base::trunc | std::ios_base::binary Yes, there are open issues with std::ios_base::binary, but llvm are not affected with them now. JC> I have successfully used a bytecode file on Windows that was created JC> on

Hi, The docs available on illuvium.com are different from the one's present in the doxygen tarball on the same page ... can the tarball be generated from the same docs as the browseable version? I considered crawling the illuvium.com site, but it would be better to simply have a tarball available. I tried generating the docs myself ... doxygen simply refuses to create pages for classes

I''m at the bloody forehead stage, so I figure it''s time to ask. After installing the robot coop''s memcache-client which everyone apparently recommends, it refuses to work because the rails cache.rb is invoking the read() method on the cache, which it _does not have_. Their library has get() and put() but no read() and write() as rails expects. What gives? Is

On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, Sameer D. Sahasrabuddhe wrote: > The docs available on illuvium.com are different from the one's present in > the doxygen tarball on the same page ... can the tarball be generated from > the same docs as the browseable version? I considered crawling the > illuvium.com site, but it would be better to simply have a tarball available. Agreed. I have been

Ok, I''m hoping this won''t be a forehead slapper, but take a look at this code: physician.name.sub(/''/, "\\''") I''m trying to substitute a single quote with a backslash and a single quote. This seems pretty simple right? Well, someone kick me and tell me why it''s not :) Here''s what I''m getting if the

Hey All, I''ve just commited rev 1505, which now includes a GraphicsContext demo, just in time for a release. *wipes forehead* So far, it''s looking pretty good. BTW Alex, another bug came up while working with GraphicsContext, but wasn''t something as major that could prevent me from completing the demo. GraphicsContext#draw_lines(size_t n, Point2Double points, Integer

Out of the blue, after working flawlessly for years, I suddenly cannot log on to my samba 3.5.6 domain with one particular Win7 Pro workstation. Nothing has apparently changed - Win7 updates applied recently, but I was able to successfully log on after that. Nothing has changed on the DC. Error message is that the trust relationship between the workstation and the primary domain failed. I'm