similar to: [LLVMdev] Introducing .. illuvium.net

On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, Sameer D. Sahasrabuddhe wrote: > The docs available on illuvium.com are different from the one's present in > the doxygen tarball on the same page ... can the tarball be generated from > the same docs as the browseable version? I considered crawling the > illuvium.com site, but it would be better to simply have a tarball available. Agreed. I have been

Chris Lattner wrote: >> I tried generating the docs myself ... doxygen simply refuses to >> create pages for classes defined in anonymous namespaces in cpp files. >> I enabled options such as EXTRACT_ALL, EXTRACT_PRIVATE and >> EXTRACT_LOCAL, but no luck. How is the publicly available >> documentation generated? > > They are generated from the Makefile in

Hi, The docs available on illuvium.com are different from the one's present in the doxygen tarball on the same page ... can the tarball be generated from the same docs as the browseable version? I considered crawling the illuvium.com site, but it would be better to simply have a tarball available. I tried generating the docs myself ... doxygen simply refuses to create pages for classes

Yes, for that you need TargetData: http://illuvium.net/docs/doxygen/classllvm_1_1TargetData.html Reid. On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 17:08 +0200, holger krekel wrote: > Hi Reid, > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 07:08 -0700, Reid Spencer wrote: > > The thing you're missing is that LLVM's primitive types have well known, > > fixed sizes that are not target dependent. A ulong is

Hi Reid, Reid Spencer wrote: > Yes, for that you need TargetData: > > http://illuvium.net/docs/doxygen/classllvm_1_1TargetData.html I feared that that would be the answer :-). We're not using the LLVM-API at the moment. We're just generating a .ll file 'by hand', e.g. via simple string operations. I guess we get what we deserve :-). Thanks for your help, Carl

Hey LLVMers, I could not get the docs for LLVM 2.1. I guess the doxygen link at http://llvm.org/releases/2.1/docs/index.html is pointing to the newest version of LLVM docs. The link was: <a href="http://llvm.org/doxygen/doxygen.tar.gz">tarball</a> best, Fernando

On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:14:41 -0800, Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > > Sorry for the sad state of the cygwin build. I had hoped to have it > cleaned up by now but many other things have been taking my time. > Although the build has been succeeding in recent days, I'm not sure it > will buy you anything. NONE of the nightly tests pass on cygwin. <ulp!>

Why not put all this into a pre-commit filter in CVS and be done with it? We'd never be bothered with it again as it would never be committed again. Reid. On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 15:11 -0500, Misha Brukman wrote: > Dear LLVMers, > > If you live on the bleeding edge (i.e. CVS version), please read! > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 12:12:54PM +0200, Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer wrote:

Its certainly possible to generate .ll files but its probably about the same amount of work to use the LLVM API and there are significant speed and validity benefits to doing so. Here's some ideas on how to handle this situation for the variable sized structs you need for PyPy: 1. Don't support the feature in your first release (not sure if this is viable or not). 2. Make some worst

FYI to llvmdev. This is a huge win for LLVM. Thanks Reid! -Chris -- http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/ http://www.nondot.org/~sabre/Projects/ ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2004 05:26:34 -0700 From: Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> To: llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: [llvm-commits] CAUTION: Type != Value LLVMers, I have committed one of the major changes on the

LLVMers, I've hacked Brian's BitterMelon demo to include Stacker and bytecode analysis information. You can try it out on the mirror at: http://llvm.x10sys.com/demo/index.cgi A new language radio buttons below the text input area permits Stacker input to be compiled and there is an extra option for generating bc data with llvm-bcanalyzer. If you're new to LLVM, try pasting the

On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 19:52, Aaron Gray wrote: > Hi Reid, > > I'll send a complete report tommorow, its getting late. Great! > > It looks like there is alot of work to do to get the MS VC version in line > with the Unix release. I am very willing to help out with porting. Yes, there are several well known issues remaining. The bugpoint tool and the debugger use unix

Hi Marshall, LLVM *is* cool .. just not on cygwin! :) Sorry for the sad state of the cygwin build. I had hoped to have it cleaned up by now but many other things have been taking my time. Although the build has been succeeding in recent days, I'm not sure it will buy you anything. NONE of the nightly tests pass on cygwin. Until I can get some time to figure out why that is happening, I doubt

Hi, Dear LLVMers I just touch llvm source code for several days, and I didn't know the interfaces of the analysises and transformations of LLVM. For exampe, how to backtrace CFG, and whether exits a backtracking interator to do such work? For a novice, I also seek for suggestions about how to become familiar with LLVM interfaces as soon as possible. Now I have a plan to write a pass based on

1. Ok will do. 2. Ok, will do. 3. It's a CallGraphPass. I mentioned this in my first post. 4. Yep, I have the header files included, I'm not sure it would compile otherwise (previously). I would get an error like LoopInfo not declared. I'll try your suggestions, thanks again! On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 9:57 AM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu>wrote: > On 11/10/11

On Sun, 2010-04-11 at 10:54 +0800, lucefe wrote: > Hi, Dear LLVMers > > I just touch llvm source code for several days, and I didn't know the > interfaces of the analysises and transformations of LLVM. For exampe, > how to backtrace CFG, and whether exits a backtracking interator to do > such work? > > For a novice, I also seek for suggestions about how to become

On 11/10/11 11:48 AM, Ryan Taylor wrote: > John, > > Thanks, this does not compile though, I get this error: First, please CC the llvmdev list. That way, others having the same question can see the conversation, and others on the list can help correct any errors I make. :) > > cdfg_pass.cpp:511:11: error: ‘class llvm::Function’ has no member > named ‘getDeclaration’

>>Does anyone know a source for a pre-built version of the same? > >To my knowledge there is no pre-built version of the cfe. See following link for CFE :- http://illuvium.com/download/ It maybe a bit out of date. I believe the CFE maybe broken at the moment, at least the Cygwin nightly test reports that it is broken and I believe this is the same thing ?

On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Reid Spencer wrote: > Why not put all this into a pre-commit filter in CVS and be done with > it? We'd never be bothered with it again as it would never be committed > again. I'd rather not have CVS commit scripts mucking with the code. If you want to have the nightly tester whine about source code with spaces at the end of lines (like it whines about

Hello Alkis, I am writting a global register allocator, and while I was searching the web to find useful links I found your message LLVMers: http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2004-February/000860.html I would appreciate it if you could send me the code or tell me how to access it. Thanks, Samah