similar to: [LLVMdev] Cygwin port

On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 10:24:29AM +1300, Oleg Smolsky wrote: > Any news on the cygwin front? What needs to be done? Can I help? At some point, LLVM built and ran on Cygwin, however, the only user at the time (Chris) no longer uses Cygwin, so it may or may not currently build on Cygwin. Please try it out, if it doesn't work, please tell us what's wrong, or, better yet, submit a patch.

Hi Reid, > 1. Make sure your path now includes <builddir>/Debug/bin instead of > <builddir>/tools/Debug. This changed a little while back. Interesting. I don't have llvm/Debug/ after building "tools-only". Is that a symlink? Do symlinks work under cygwin? (I run xp and both of my partitions are ntfs) > If those don't clear the problem, please tell me

On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 11:23:39AM +1300, Oleg Smolsky wrote: > > 1. Make sure your path now includes <builddir>/Debug/bin instead of > > <builddir>/tools/Debug. This changed a little while back. > > Interesting. I don't have llvm/Debug/ after building "tools-only". Is > that a symlink? Do symlinks work under cygwin? (I run xp and both of my >

Hi all, After successfully building llvm tools-only and cfontend, I went back to llvm directory and ran configure --with-llvmgccdir=$CFEINSTALL Unfortunately, at the end of the process I got the following configure: WARNING: ***** llvm C/C++ front end was not found, or does not configure: WARNING: ***** appear to be working. And I do have CFEINSTALL environment variable.... BTW, I have noticed

I'm CC'ing the llvm-dev list because other people are more knowledgeable about the bytecode format/encoding than I am. Please follow-up the replies to the list. On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 11:27:53AM -0700, Yiping Fan wrote: > We also want to extend the llvm instructions/intrinsic > functions/types/passes to support our high-level synthesis for > hardware. First of all, we want to

Hi all, > Please try it out, if it doesn't work, please tell us what's > wrong, or, better yet, submit a patch. :) Alright, here are the results of building the latest llvm from CVS under cygwin: lib\Debugger\SourceFile.cpp needs #include <assert.h> when building with gcc 3.3.3 tools\gccld\gccld.cpp line 128 tools\llvm-ld\llvm-ld line 318 need

Hi, When I compile httpd-2.0, llvmgcc reports many struct types and macros undeclared, but gnu-gcc can compile httpd-2.0 completely.

Hi Chris, It did compile when I gave that option. But it gives me an error when I try to run the executable on an Intel machine. ----- 1513158 is not prime. Exception handler needed, but not enabled. Recompile program with -enable-correct-eh-support. lli[0x8429bb4] lli[0x8429dc0] /lib/libc.so.6[0x40128c18] /lib/libc.so.6(abort+0x161)[0x40129cb5] [0x403da922] ../../../i386: line 4: 27606

Hi, I'm a newbie and just installed LLVM on a Linux box. I followe "The LLVM Getting Started Guide" on the web and have some trouble on the section "An Example Using the LLVM Tool Chain". When I compile the simple hello.c program with "llvmgcc hello.c -o hello", the system complains -- gcc: installation problem, cannot exec `gccas': Permission denied. Does

Perhaps I am missing some link. Need a bit clarification. For the C language, I want to access the LLVM code immediately generated by llvmgcc(cfrontend/bin/gcc) before it undergoes any further transformation or optimization. 1) Are there any libraries that enable me to parse C code and create the Module instance. 2) If answer to 1) is no, then is there some other way to create Module

Vinay, On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 02:27:53PM -0500, Vinay S. Belgaumkar wrote: > It did compile when I gave that option. But it gives me an error > when I try to run the executable on an Intel machine. > ----- > 1513158 is not prime. > Exception handler needed, but not enabled. Recompile program with > -enable-correct-eh-support. [snip] This error message is from LLVM, not the

> Yes, this is no problem. You can do something like > this: > > $ llvmgcc X.c -c -o X.bc > $ llc X.bc -o X.s > $ gcc Y.c -o Y.o -c > $ gcc X.s Y.o -o program > $ ./program Ok, fine, and what about the interpreter? It takes 100% llvm, doesn't it? Or is there some kind of import facility (perhaps as an specially interpreted call or as an extension to llvm which makes

Hi, I am working with llvm 1.3 on a sparcv9 machine. I have successfully built llvm and llvm-gcc frontend. I can run many tools including llvmgcc, llvm-dis, and llc. After using /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc to assemble .s file into a program binary, I can run the binary correctly as well. I am interested in the JIT compiler (lli). When I directly run the LLVM bytecode using interpretation ("lli

Hi all LLVMor, I just tried to compile a simple code and analyze the number of the basic blocks. But after compile, what I got, the bytecode is seems to be optimized bytecode. So the information of basic blocks is not what I expected. I want ot use the code as example to see how some of code optimization methods work. However, after compiling file using llvm test.c -o test, bytecode file

> Also, it would be really nice if an official > cygwin build (the binary) was published too. I spent quite a bit of > time screwing with it a few months ago, and it was quite a bastard to > get going... I had quite a time with it too, could only get the debug version to build as there seemed to be an internal problem with ld. I would very interested in how you got it running and

Dear All, I downloaded the latest CVS of llvm I want to try to use LLVM only for JIT only use (generating code in memory for x86 and, when available PowerPC [32bits]) How do I ./configure to avoid being asked about llvmgcc, which, in my very partial understanding, is only used to parse C code... If I understand correctly what Chris Lattner emailed me, LLVM uses only GCC frontend for C & C++

On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 08:37:46AM +0200, Alex Vinokur wrote: > But it seems that there are no asterisks at > * http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/testresults/ > * http://llvm.x10sys.com/testresults/Cygwin/ That's because there was a build error (see the big red notice). Check out http://llvm.x10sys.com/testresults/Cygwin/2004-12-27.html > By the way, is it possible to send a relevant

Hello Aaron, Aaron Gray wrote on 14/10/2005 at 5:50 a.m.: >> Also, it would be really nice if an official cygwin build (the >> binary) was published too. I spent quite a bit of time screwing >> with it a few months ago, and it was quite a bastard to get >> going... > I had quite a time with it too, could only get the debug version to > build as there seemed to be an

On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 08:13:21AM +0200, Alex Vinokur wrote: > Thank you for that information. I will wait until you get Cygwin > issues figured out. How can I know of that? Check out the link to the Cygwin nightly tester results here: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/testresults/ Wait until most of the asterisks in the test results go away. :) The tester runs nightly, so checking every few

On Tue, 2004-12-28 at 22:42, Misha Brukman wrote: > This would be the right one, so maybe if we ask Reid nicely, he'll do it > (as he maintains the Cygwin nightly tester). I haven't used Net News since its signal-to-noise ratio dropped below my tolerance level (circa 1995). However, if you'd like to tell me how to make the post, I'd be happy to. -------------- next part