similar to: [LLVMdev] FileUtilities.cpp error: `close' undeclared

Henrik. ============================================================= Henrik Bach Open Source Developer e-mail: henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com ============================================================= Got Freedom? Software Freedom Day 2004 - 28th of August http://www.softwarefreedomday.org/ =============================================================

Replace __time_t with time_t in my question. I've compiled function: std::string TimeValue::toString() const { // Alas, asctime is not re-entrant on Windows... //hb: __time64_t ourTime = this->toEpochTime(); time_t ourTime = this->toEpochTime(); //hb: char* buffer = ::asctime(::_localtime64(&ourTime)); char* buffer = ::asctime(::localtime(&ourTime)); std::string

Hi Reid, I don't think I've initiated a parallel build by this command: ------------------------ make TOOLLINKOPTSB+=-ldbghelp TOOLLINKOPTSB+=-lpsapi LDFLAGS+='-Wl,--no-keep-memory' -r VERBOSE=1 ------------------------ Henrik. >From: Reid Spencer Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:05:51 -0800 > >It looks like what you're getting is a sharing violation. Although, I

Hi Jeff and others, When building the llvm runtime, I always get this error message: 'Can't destroy file: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process.' The file is destoyed anyway. I think that the the real error is the path for the file (*/\file.tmp). However, I can't find the bug in the source. Do you have any clue?:

I have no problems... Henrik Bach wrote: > Henrik. > > ============================================================= > Henrik Bach > Open Source Developer > > e-mail: henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com > ============================================================= > Got Freedom? > Software Freedom Day 2004 - 28th of August > http://www.softwarefreedomday.org/ >

Hi Jeff, It seems that the above project isn't committed into cvs. Henrik. ============================================================= Henrik Bach Open Source Developer e-mail: henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com ============================================================= Got Freedom? Software Freedom Day 2004 - 28th of August http://www.softwarefreedomday.org/

Hi, Is there an easy way to test whether an llvm-tool is functioning properly? Henrik. ============================================================= Henrik Bach LLVM Open Source Developer e-mail: henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com ============================================================= No Software patents - Thank you Poland: http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/en/m/intro/app0411.html Got

============================================================= Henrik Bach LLVM Open Source Developer e-mail: henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com ============================================================= 'Nothing is impossible; The impossible just takes longer time :)' - Inventor of a new energy saver light bulp from Denmark. No software patents! Got Freedom? Software Freedom Day - 10th

Hi Reid, Looking closer at the build process, I find that Path.cpp doesn't get compiled, even if it is a newer version than its *.o file. That's probaly the reason the error still exists. I've zipped and attached the trace after the point the new Path.cpp was updated by cvs. It clearly shows that it newer gets compiled and now shows that it is the dependencies in the makefile

It looks like what you're getting is a sharing violation. Although, I don't understand why. The llvm-ar.exe when its building an archive file always builds it in a temporary. Only when that is complete does it remove the old one and rename the temporary. Perhaps this is a result of doing parallel build and the "lib3.tmp" file (that name looks wrong to me) is being accessed by

Hi, Can anyone tell me why CopyFile is the only undefined reference from Path.cpp? --------------- llvm[2]: Linking Debug executable gccld c:/projects/build/MinGW/llvm-1-1/tools/gccld/Debug/gccld.o(.text+0x439): In function `Z15EmitShellScriptPPc': c:/projects/src/llvm-1/llvm/tools/gccld/gccld.cpp:127: undefined reference to `llvm::sys::CopyFile(llvm::sys::Path const&, llvm::sys::Path

Hi Reid, Looking closer at the build process, I find that Path.cpp doesn't get compiled, even if it is a newer version than its *.o file. That's probaly the reason the error still exists. I've zipped and attached the trace after the point the new Path.cpp was updated by cvs. It clearly shows that it newer gets compiled and now shows that it is the dependencies in the makefile

Hi, Now, I've build the tools and the cfe. However, 'make check' gave me the attached results. Summarized as follows: # of expected passes 1081 # of unexpected failures 26 # of expected failures 32 I configured llvm with following options: '--prefix=/home/hb/llvm/ --enable-targets=host-only'. I used gcc version 3.4.2 to build the tools and cfe. The cfe is version:

Hi Reid, The error still exists. However, looking on the function in Win32/Path.cpp: -------------- void sys::CopyFile(const sys::Path &Dest, const sys::Path &Src) { if (!::CopyFile(Src.c_str(), Dest.c_str(), false)) ThrowError("Can't copy '" + Src.toString() + "' to '" + Dest.toString() + "'"); } -------------- I

This is one of the reasons I'm getting rid of the "platform" link. I'm not sure what platform you're working on, but on Cygwin it causes problems. Cygwin doesn't like .. through a soft link and generates incorrect file names. I imagine this is what is happening to the dependencies. In any event, the "platform" link will be gone before the new year. Sorry for

Hi As shown below, the .\configure script found a version of stat.h: --------------------- configure:4382: checking for sys/stat.h configure:4399: gcc -c -g -O2 conftest.c >&5 configure:4402: $? = 0 configure:4405: test -s conftest.o configure:4408: $? = 0 configure:4419: result: yes --------------------- However, I got this error when compiling: --------------------- FileUtilities.cpp:

Hi Henrik, You don't have the latest C/C++ Front End Source code. Please update from CVS to get the fix for the 2005-06-15-ExpandGotoInternalProblem.c test. Note the date of the test (5 days ago). Reid. On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 18:42 +0200, Henrik Bach wrote: > Hi, > > Now, I've build the tools and the cfe. However, 'make check' gave me the > attached results.

>From: Reid Spencer Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:23:49 -0800 > >Nope, unless "make" is an alias for "make -j 4" (like I have) make is make for me. > >Could you try using TOOL_VERBOSE=1 with make to get more output ? I've attached an output. Henrik. >Did you try just running the llvm-ar command by itself ? >If not, could you and give it the V (capital

Hi there According to the manual SPEEX_SET_COMPLEXITY sets the allowed CPU usage for the encoder. I've tried changing the complexity from 1 to 10 to see if I were able to notice any difference in sound quality but I have not. Shouldn't the effect of a high complexity increase the sound quality? Kind regards Bjoern _________________________________________________________________ Log

Hi Reid, Now, I've removed the file and updated the source tree with this command: cvs -z3 -d :pserver:anon at llvm-cvs.cs.uiuc.edu:/var/cvs/llvm update -PdR llvm However, the file still exits. Henrik. >From: Reid Spencer >Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 10:57:54 -0700 > >Hi Henrik, > >You don't have the latest C/C++ Front End Source code. Please update >from CVS to get