similar to: [LLVMdev] calling the printf funtion

The gcc front-end page in llvm.cs.uiuc.edu seems to be down for the last 18 hrs. I was finding that tool very useful to get the syntactic constructs, could someone fix it ? Thanks Jai On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 11:10:00 -0600, Vikram S. Adve <vadve at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote: > Just compile a trivial C program containing printf through llvm-gcc and > you will see how to call printf from within

On Sat, 11 Dec 2004, Jai Vasanth wrote: > The gcc front-end page in llvm.cs.uiuc.edu seems to be down for the > last 18 hrs. I was finding that tool very useful to get the syntactic > constructs, could someone fix it ? Fixed, sorry. -Chris > On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 11:10:00 -0600, Vikram S. Adve <vadve at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote: >> Just compile a trivial C program containing

What was the issue? On Sat, 2004-12-11 at 14:59, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Sat, 11 Dec 2004, Jai Vasanth wrote: > > The gcc front-end page in llvm.cs.uiuc.edu seems to be down for the > > last 18 hrs. I was finding that tool very useful to get the syntactic > > constructs, could someone fix it ? > > Fixed, sorry. > > -Chris > > > On Sat, 11 Dec 2004

Just compile a trivial C program containing printf through llvm-gcc and you will see how to call printf from within llvm. You could even do it on the llvm web page if you don't have llvm-gcc installed. --Vikram http://www.cs.uiuc.edu/~vadve http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/ On Dec 11, 2004, at 1:13 AM, <vasanth2 at uiuc.edu> wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to display results on the

Hi, %_t4 = add int 23 , 0 %_t5 = add int %_t4 , 1 %_t4 = add int %_t5 , 0 the above line of code give an error when i try to convert to bytecode. The error is that I am trying to redefine %_t4. Is there a way to reassign a variable with another value. Also is there a way to assign a value to a variable. I couldnt do that so I added 0 to it ! :) Thanks Jai

Dear All, Here's a question Vikram and I received. Is the LLVM JIT thread safe? -- John T. -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: "Adve, Vikram Sadanand" <vadve at uiuc.edu> Subject: Fwd: LLVM and threading Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 09:48:59 -0500 Size: 3037 URL:

We are looking for an open source C++ parser other than g++ if possible. Clang would be great but its C++ support is still some way away and we need something that works or nearly works now. Does anyone have any experience with ANTLR for parsing C++ and for extending their C++ parser? Any other feedback on ANTLR in general would be welcome too. Thanks, --Vikram Associate Professor,

First, kudos on the ThinLTO results reported in your blog post — they’re impressive and the system sounds really well engineered. I’m starting to try it out on a large piece of software and I’d like to make sure I know what to expect. The blog said it will be available in clang-3.9 but both clang-3.8 and trunk seem to have some degree of support for it. What is the status of ThinLTO in 3.8

That sounds like a problem. Just so I understand, do you mean there isn't the run-time support etc. to write back ends for the C++ language, or that the compiler IR is also somehow insufficient to write a code generator? --Vikram Associate Professor, Computer Science University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign http://llvm.org/~vadve On Jul 11, 2009, at 3:00 PM, Granville Barnett

On Oct 15, 2009, at 10:45 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > Unfortunately, we found out at the last minute that Apple has a rule > which prevents its engineers from giving video taped talks or > distributing slides. We will hold onto the video and slide assets in > case this rule changes in the future. > > -Chris Chris, I hope you can pass my message along to the people at Apple

On Apr 26, 2006, at 10:45 AM, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Vikram" == Vikram Adve <vadve at cs.uiuc.edu> writes: > > Vikram> Either way, one issue that you will have to deal with is > preserving > Vikram> the behavior of Java exceptions (assuming you care about > that). LLVM > Vikram> does not preserve the order of potentially

Have any way to write a funtion into a list ? -- Nash - morrison at ibms.sinica.edu.tw

Hi, I have a variable X classified in a lot of groups and I need to run the [fitdistr] funtion for each group. I tried with the [by] or the [tapply] funtions because my data is organize in two columns (variable and the groups), but neither of these command work. If somebody have a tip to help me up I really appreciate it. thanks, [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

> On Jul 22, 2016, at 12:36 PM, Teresa Johnson via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi Vikram, > > Thanks! > > I'm not sure what part got committed in the 3.8 timeframe - it looks like that was released back in March? 3.8 was branched in early January though. It has some of the work-in-progress for ThinLTO, it “could” work in simple cases I

Hi Mehdi, Yes, we did see your earlier post. Efficient (de)serialization is definitely important for both exporting (a la LTO and ThinLTO) and for shipping code as IR. I expect most use cases of the latter would benefit. -—Vikram // Vikram S. Adve // Professor, Department of Computer Science // University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign // vadve at illinois.edu<mailto:vadve at

I'm trying to decide whether to use either the MIPS or ARM back ends for course projects in our introductory compiler class. I'd like to use something that has a stable back end, so that the students can use the selector, probably without changes, and do a project on register allocation and stack layout. We don't have MIPS or ARM hardware (other than possibly a few donated Android

Does anyone know if the Lines-of-code metric on the Nightly Test page is accurate? And does it include Makefiles and test suite source or only LLVM source? Thanks, --Vikram http://www.cs.uiuc.edu/~vadve http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/

On Apr 23, 2006, at 9:32 PM, Archie Cobbs wrote: > Chris Lattner wrote: >>> I think the point of llvm-java was to avoid a JVM. That is, it >>> converts >> llvm-java is the JVM. >>> either Java source or Java bytecode into equivalent LLVM bytecode. I >> llvm-java only supports input from Java bytecode. >>> think the big thing lacking so far are

I'm encountering a new problem building llvm (from CVS) on Solaris. The tblgen executable builds successfully but it seems to use the wrong version of libstdc++ : % /home/vadve/vadve/llvm-sparc/Debug/bin/tblgen --help ld.so.1: /home/vadve/vadve/llvm-sparc/Debug/bin/tblgen: fatal: /home/ vadve/lattner/local/x86-fc1/gcc-3.4.2/lib/libstdc++.so.6: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32 Killed This

On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 5:58 PM, Vikram S. Adve <vadve at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote: > On Apr 4, 2008, at 4:51 PM, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 2:38 AM, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> On Apr 2, 2008, at 10:11 PM, Xuehai Qian wrote: > >>> Hi LLVMers, > >>> I am a PHD student in CS dept in UIUC,