similar to: [LLVMdev] Question about insert call func with pionter parameter

Hi, Sorry for bothering you guys again. I got problem when I am trying to recover the Global Variable Initial value. What I did is like the following ConstantArray *Cstr = dyn_cast<ConstantArray>(gI->getInitializer()); // the above instruction enable me to get the content of initial string of global variable, like char a[10] ="test global"; And then I make some change for

Thanks for your reply. After I change Cstr to gI, it compiled successfully. Thanks again. Another question is for constructing getelementpt. // C code char gStrA[10] = "test str"; // here is Global variable,gStrA and initializer "test str" char gStrB[10]= "test str2"; main(){ int = i; char *pGVars[20]; // here, the pGVar is for storing the address of each

I recently began hacking around with my first LLVM pass. The big picture is that I would like to insert function calls for each instruction type, and pass some parameters based on the instruction type. Then I will link the output to some C file that implements those functions. Things were going well until I started trying to make function calls with a pointer as a parameter. For example, I would

Hi, Thanks so much at first. > Here are some observations: > > > for C level, > > > > char a[]="global string test"; > > for(i=0;i<strlen(a);i++){ > > a[i]= a[i]^RANDMON; > > } > > If you compile this C code, "global string test" will occur in the program > binary, so you have not obfuscated anything. You can

Thanks Chris, but the method you mentioned is not what I want. Maybe I didn't make it clear. As you said, /runtime/libprofile is runtime library for the following function. llvm_start_func_profiling llvm_start_block_profiling llvm_start_basic_block_tracing llvm_trace_basic_block And those above functions can be inserted into basic block etc for getting profile. However, those

Hi Mitnick, > === Overview === > > The general concept is to replaced void with {}. And 'ret void' is a synonym of > 'ret {} {}.' in a sense the concept is just to delete void and not to replace it with anything in particular. Of course front-ends (clang, dragonegg) need to produce something instead of void, and {} is an example of what they might produce, but they

Thank you Chris, for your hint, but I am still too stupid. I tried two versions asm_arguments.push_back(Type::VoidTy); FunctionType *asm_type = FunctionType::get(Type::VoidTy, asm_arguments, false); Alternatively FunctionType *asm_type = FunctionType::get(Type::VoidTy, std::vector<const Type*>(), false); . Can you give me a snippet of example code, or somebody else?

I've been creating some R tools that manipulate objective functions for optimization. In so doing, I create a character string with R code, and then want to have it in my workspace. Currently -- and this works fine -- I write the code out, then use source() to bring it in again. Example: cstr<-"jack<-function(x){\n cat(\"Silly x:\")\n print(x) \n }\n" write(cstr,

On 5/7/12 10:36 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Mitnick, > >> === Overview === >> >> The general concept is to replaced void with {}. And 'ret void' is a synonym of >> 'ret {} {}.' > in a sense the concept is just to delete void and not to replace it with > anything in particular. Of course front-ends (clang, dragonegg) need to produce >

Hi everyone, My apologies if this isn?t the right place to submit this?I?m new to the R-devel community and still figuring out what is where. If people want to skip my writeup and just look at the code, I?ve made a repository for it here: https://github.com/ahl27/new_dendrapply/tree/master. I?m not quite sure how to integrate it into a fork of R-devel; the package structure is different from

Hello all, I am willing to do "eliminating the void type" project. Is there anyone working on it? === Overview === The general concept is to replaced void with {}. And 'ret void' is a synonym of 'ret {} {}.' === Further Implementation Details === 1. Deleting VoidTyID 2. Deleting LLVMVoidTypeKind (one-to-one relation between VoidTyID and LLVMVoidTypeKind) 3. Use

On Jul 31, 2009, at 5:04 PM, Michael Graumann wrote: > Thank you Chris, > for your hint, but I am still too stupid. I tried two versions > > asm_arguments.push_back(Type::VoidTy); > FunctionType *asm_type = FunctionType::get(Type::VoidTy, > asm_arguments, false); > > Alternatively > > FunctionType *asm_type = FunctionType::get(Type::VoidTy, >

Hi, both versions are working: FunctionType *asm_Ftype = FunctionType::get(Type::VoidTy, std::vector<const Type*>(), false); InlineAsm* Iasm = InlineAsm::get(asm_Ftype,"isync","~{dirflag},~{fpsr},~{flags}",true); How can I insert this InlineAsm, because it is no instruction and this way it will not work: Instruction *pi = bi;

excuse me for bother you again . a little supplement Constant* c = findValue(m,"E1$entry"); Constant* c2 = findValue(m,"E1$str"); I can get string object from c2 string s = cast<ConstantArray>(c2)->getAsString(); but it is not applicable for c string s= cast<ConstantArray>(c)->getAsString(); // Assert Fail because c is ConstantExpr::GetElementPtr

On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, Chris Lattner wrote: >> Any ideas what could be wrong? > > Sorry for the delay, please try this tarball: > http://nondot.org/sabre/2006-03-02-llvm-gcc-4.tar.gz Actually, do to a recent change in CVS, this tarball will probably not work anymore. Please apply the attached (small) patch on top of it in the gcc directory. Worth noting, this front-end only works

Hi all, In several of the transformations I'm working on I need to embed the logical equivalent of puts/printf/etc. calls inline with code. I am having some difficulties getting the transformation code right. As I understand it, I should be creating a ConstantArray based on the string (in this case I'm taking an instruction, 'disassembling' it to an ostringstream then turning

Hi, all: I want to check small files' property(such as date, path, and so on) frequently. The files are stored in netwrok driver and their sizes vary from 2KB to 5KB. I found that Windows 2K outperform Linux/Samba very much after I campared the bench results. I am very confused about it and who can explain it? The computers' configurations are as follows: 1. PC Client It

Hello Duncan, There is a discussion with Chris Lattner: http://old.nabble.com/Eliminating-the-'void'-type-td33726468.html In the discussion, Chris Lattner suggest Type::getVoidTy() should still exist and return {} for API continuity. If VoidTy and isVoidTy() go away, how do deal with the isVoidTy() function call in LLVM source tree? Another issue is: What should ReturnInst constructor

I am writing a pass where I need to make a function deceleration for printf. Below is the code I'm trying to use. ----- bool MyPass::runOnModule(Module &m) { vector<const Type*> args; args.push_back(PointerType::get(Type::SByteTy)); Function* f = m.getOrInsertFunction("printf", FunctionType::get(Type::IntTy, args, true)); ----- When I insert a call

hi I have one llvm program like this : ... ; define ConstantArray "E1$str" = internal constant [3 x sbyte] c"E1\00" ; use getPtrPtrFromArrayPtr to define SByte* from ConstantArray "E1$entry" = internal constant sbyte* getelementptr ([3 x sbyte]* "E1$str", uint 0, uint 0) ... when i want to get std::string object from this declaration in