Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Building llvm and cfrontend under cygwin"
2004 Dec 05
1
[LLVMdev] Building llvm and cfrontend under cygwin
Hi there,
I'm trying to build llvm under cygwin running under windows xp, and have
struck the following problem:
-- llvm: tools-only built ok
-- cfrontend: built ok
-- llvm: full build failed at the following point:
make[3]: Entering directory
`/cygdrive/d/3rd-party/llvm/runtime/GCCLibraries/crtend'
Compiling crtend.c to bytecode
Compiling listend.ll to bytecode
Linking comp_main.bc
2004 Aug 16
1
[LLVMdev] Re: [llvm-announce] LLVM 1.3 Release!]
Misha Brukman wrote:
>On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 01:07:39PM +0200, Robert Feldt wrote:
>
>
>>However, when I go back to rebuild llvm, reconfigure, setting the
>>CFEINSTALL dir, then make it can build the tools ok but not the
>>runtime:
>>
>>
>[snip]
>
>
>>Compiling crtend.c to bytecode
>>Files/ATI: not found
>>
>>
2004 Dec 10
1
[LLVMdev] Building llvm and cfrontend under cygwin
Hi Chris,
> Also note, LLVM 1.4 will be released in the next few days, so if
waiting is
> an option, you might choose to do so.
Alright, I've got llvm and llvm-gcc from RELEASE_14 cvs and tried
building it under cygwin.
1) The first problem is with llvm in SysUtils.c:
int executeProgram(const char *filename, char *const argv[], char *const
envp[])
{
................
execveTy
2004 Aug 16
3
[LLVMdev] Re: [llvm-announce] LLVM 1.3 Release!]
Chris Lattner wrote:
>On Sun, 15 Aug 2004, Robert Feldt wrote:
>
>
>
>>However, I wonder if someone supplies pre-built cfrontend binaries for
>>cygwin?
>>
>>
>
>Nope, we don't have one yet, sorry.
>
>
>
>>I followed the instructions and tried to build them myself but get
>>when building the cfrontend. Any ideas?
>>
2004 Aug 19
0
[LLVMdev] Can't get llvmg++ to work
On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 22:14, Jeff Cohen wrote:
> I'm another new person to LLVM.
Hi Jeff. Welcome.
> I can't successfully compile and
> execute a simple C++ program. The compiler seems to work, as it
> produces a.out and a.out.bc files, but I get a whole bunch of warnings:
>
> WARNING: Found global types that are not compatible:
>
2004 Aug 19
1
[LLVMdev] Can't get llvmg++ to work
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 08:45:23 -0700
Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote:
> > I'm running FreeBSD 5.2.1 with gcc 3.3.3. I had some problem starting
> > the build as I had to get linux binary emulation to work. (The problem
> > here is that FreeBSD can be made compatible with 5 different distros,
> > and not all of them work with LLVM. I used linux_base-8;
2004 Aug 19
4
[LLVMdev] Can't get llvmg++ to work
I'm another new person to LLVM. I can't successfully compile and
execute a simple C++ program. The compiler seems to work, as it
produces a.out and a.out.bc files, but I get a whole bunch of warnings:
WARNING: Found global types that are not compatible:
"struct.std::messages<wchar_t>"* %_ZN9__gnu_cxx10messages_cE
[16 x sbyte]*
2004 Dec 22
0
[LLVMdev] More on Cygwin
Privet,
> > Unfortunately, at the end of the process I got the following
> > configure: WARNING: ***** llvm C/C++ front end was not
> > found, or does not appear to be working.
> Yes, Reid changed the CFE build instructions to add
> "--program-prefix=llvm" to the end of the configure line, but
> autoconf and Makefiles are not yet updated with that change.
2004 Aug 20
2
[LLVMdev] Can't get llvmg++ to work
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 08:45:23 -0700
Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote:
>
> Also, as a general note, make sure you follow precisely the steps for
> building the c front end. If you discover any BSDisms that aren't
> documented, we'd love to hear about them.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Reid.
>
OK. I've built the front end without any heartaches, but I did
2004 Jul 21
0
[LLVMdev] GC questions.
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, Chris Lattner wrote:
>
> Yes, this makes a tremendous amount of sense. Do you think you could
> prepare some patches to make this happen? If you have any questions, feel
> free to ask :)
Ok, a patch[1] is attached. I didn't care to coerce the offset, since I
assume that it is an uint, but maybe I should? Hopefully I've understood
the llvm source
2004 Aug 20
0
[LLVMdev] Can't get llvmg++ to work
Hi Jeff,
On Fri, 2004-08-20 at 08:07, Jeff Cohen wrote:
> OK. I've built the front end without any heartaches, but I did
> encountered the following glitches:
>
> The documentation of --with-llvmgccdir is a bit ambiguous. I had to try
> several paths before I got the right one. It should state that the
> directory is <path>/cfrontend/<platform>/llvm-gcc.
2004 Aug 16
0
[LLVMdev] Re: [llvm-announce] LLVM 1.3 Release!]
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 01:07:39PM +0200, Robert Feldt wrote:
> However, when I go back to rebuild llvm, reconfigure, setting the
> CFEINSTALL dir, then make it can build the tools ok but not the
> runtime:
[snip]
> Compiling crtend.c to bytecode
> Files/ATI: not found
[snip]
> I don't understand the error message since I see no reference to
> Files/ATI. Any clues?
Can
2004 Jul 22
2
[LLVMdev] GC questions.
Ok, here's the new patch. (Please tell me if I shouldn't mail patches
directly on the mailing list.)
While I was editing LowerGC.cpp I made a little test (not part of this
patch, but the diff with LowerGC.cpp in cvs is attached). I've added a new
intrinsic called llvm.gcroot_value(sbyte*, sbyte*), which takes a pointer
directly instead and transforms it into an alloca. The idea is the
2006 Jul 30
2
[LLVMdev] Building llvm under cygwin
Hi!
I'm trying to build LLVM under cygwin.
I have the latest version of cygwin and CVS versions of llvm, llvm-test and
llvm-gcc.
make of tools only succeeded.
make of frontend succeeded too
but full make of llvm failed on crtend in llvm/runtime/GCCLibraries with the
following message:
llvm[0]: Compiling crtend.c for Debug build (bytecode)
/bin/sh: -c: line 0: syntax error near unexpected
2003 Oct 26
2
[LLVMdev] redhat 9, compiling llvm-1.0.tar.gz
Hi all,
compilation of package llvm-1.0.tar.gz under redhat 9 is failed with following output:
-------
make[3]: *** No rule to make target `/home/vak/llvm/llvm/runtime/GCCLibraries/crtend/BytecodeObj/C++-Exception.bc', needed by `/home/vak/llvm/llvm/lib/BytecodeLibs/libcrtend.bc'. Stop.
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/vak/llvm/llvm/runtime/GCCLibraries/crtend'
...skipped
-------
2005 Jan 09
1
[LLVMdev] Cygwin build is still broken
Happy New Year all,
I've just updated to the latest CVS version and cygwin port is still
broken. When building full llvm:
llvm[3]: Compiling crtend.c for Debug build (bytecode)
llvm[3]: Compiling listend.ll for Debug build
llvm[3]: Linking comp_main.bc component...
assertion "(Result->isFirstClassType() || Result == Type::VoidTy ||
isa<OpaqueType>(Result)) && "LLVM
2006 Jul 31
0
[LLVMdev] Building llvm under cygwin
If you're building llvm-gcc4, you don't need the runtime libraries, so
I'd just stick with the "tools-only" build and declare success. If
you're building llvm-gcc3, I'd suggest you switch to llvm-gcc4 :)
However, the problem appears to be your PATH variable. In your path you
have the following directory: C:/Program Files/Microsoft DirectX SDK
(June
2003 Oct 26
0
[LLVMdev] redhat 9, compiling llvm-1.0.tar.gz
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, [koi8-r] "Valery A.Khamenya[koi8-r] " wrote:
> compilation of package llvm-1.0.tar.gz under redhat 9 is failed with
> following output:
> make[3]: *** No rule to make target `/home/vak/llvm/llvm/runtime/GCCLibraries/crtend/BytecodeObj/C++-Exception.bc', needed by `/home/vak/llvm/llvm/lib/BytecodeLibs/libcrtend.bc'. Stop.
> make[3]: Leaving
2006 Oct 10
1
[LLVMdev] gccas problem with crtend.ll again
> On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, [UTF-8] Rafael Esp?ndola wrote:
>
> > I am trying to bootstrap the just released gcc 4.0.1 and the cvs
head llvm.
> >
> > I was able to build the llvm tools without a problem.
> > gcc has a small problem (from the apple branch IIRC): libojc is
built
> > unconditionally, so objc must be in the --enable-languages option
for
> > the
2004 Dec 07
2
[LLVMdev] Building llvm and cfrontend under cygwin
Hi Reid,
> 1. Make sure your path now includes <builddir>/Debug/bin instead of
> <builddir>/tools/Debug. This changed a little while back.
Interesting. I don't have llvm/Debug/ after building "tools-only". Is
that a symlink? Do symlinks work under cygwin? (I run xp and both of my
partitions are ntfs)
> If those don't clear the problem, please tell me