Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] PR466 & library names"
2006 Oct 30
2
[LLVMdev] Multisource Test Failures?
Hi all,
Is anyone else seeing tests in the Multisource/Applications directory
failing with something looking like this:
/Users/wendling/llvm/llvm.obj/Debug/bin/gccld -L/Users/wendling/llvm/
llvm-gcc4.install/lib/gcc/powerpc-apple-darwin8.8.0/3.4-llvm -L/
Users/wendling/llvm/llvm-gcc4.install/lib Output/siod.linked.bc -lc
-lpthread -lltdl -lm -o Output/siod.llvm
gccld: warning: Cannot
2005 Mar 01
3
[LLVMdev] question about gccld and external libraries
hi,
I'm really new to llvm. I've successfully bootstrapped llvm-14 on my
system and am able to successfully compile c code to llvm.
the problem is now that gccld is complaining that it can't find the
libraries, like "c" or "crtend". [1]
all is fine, if I just use intrinsified functions like printf and
friends, but I want to use the clock_gettime function and
2004 Oct 27
2
[LLVMdev] Some Questions about LLVM
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=GB2312" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Yes, I checked that envvar, and it is set.<br>
The error msg when compiling a .c
2012 Mar 14
2
[LLVMdev] Linking static external library into an LLVM pass library?
This document http://llvm.org/docs/Projects.html says the USEDLIBS should
be used to statically link libraries:
USEDLIBSThis variable holds a space separated list of libraries that should
be linked into the program. These libraries must be libraries that come
from your *lib* directory. The libraries must be specified without their
"lib" prefix. For example, to link libsample.a, you
2006 Dec 10
2
[LLVMdev] How to compile apps to bc files with the new llvm-gcc4?
Chandler/Domagoj,
On Sun, 2006-12-10 at 10:53 -0500, Chandler Carruth wrote:
> Unless I'm missing something, the problem lies directly with the fact
> that you are trying to do a link-stage operation with the GCC
> frontend. GCC, by default, probably runs "ld" or another system
> linker, which grabs the executable from binutils. This linker hasn't
> been modified
2004 Sep 11
0
[LLVMdev] POST MORTEM: llvm-test changes
For the heck of it I tried upgrading to gcc 3.4.2 (from 3.3.3). It
didn't make a difference. So here are the failures for llvm-test. All
diffs are against the "native" output.
===================== MultiSource/Applications/sgefa
cbe failed differently from jit/llc. First cbe:
84c84
< One-Norm(A) ---------- 8.879153e+02.
---
> One-Norm(A) ---------- 8.879156e+02.
2005 Aug 02
0
[LLVMdev] [patch] gccld not passing -export-dynamic to gcc for link
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 05:13:15PM -0500, Nicholas Riley wrote:
> The attached patch fixes this.
...but had tabs in it. Misha kindly reminded me off-list that this
was bad. Try this one instead.
--
Nicholas Riley <njriley at uiuc.edu> | <http://www.uiuc.edu/ph/www/njriley>
-------------- next part --------------
Index: tools/gccld/GenerateCode.cpp
2005 Aug 01
2
[LLVMdev] [patch] gccld not passing -export-dynamic to gcc for link
gccld passes -shared through if it's generating a shared library, but
if you're compiling a program that needs to have its symbols
externally accessible, it doesn't pass -export-dynamic through to gcc
for the final link.
The attached patch fixes this. I've tested with a small test case I
sent Chris, and with Python; both seem to work.
I also fixed some inaccurate comments in
2004 Dec 12
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM_LIB_SEARCH_PATH
Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004, Reid Spencer wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I need to solicit your opinion about something.
>>
>> I'm toying with the idea of getting rid of LLVM_LIB_SEARCH_PATH. Right
>> now the linkers will use this environment variable if it specifies a
>> single directory. It will look in that directory to find
2005 May 05
0
[LLVMdev] Scheme + LLVM JIT
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 03:46:58AM -0400, Alexander Friedman wrote:
> On May 5, Misha Brukman wrote:
> > To the best of my knowledge, this has not been done and no one has
> > announced their intent to work on it, so if you are interested,
> > you'd be more than welcome to do so.
>
> My C++ knowledge is completely non-existant, but so far I've had a
>
2005 Mar 14
2
[LLVMdev] Linking LLVM code with LLVM
Excuse the long post,
Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, Marc Ordinas i Llopis wrote:
>
>> Sorry if this is obvious.
>> I'm trying to link LLVM-generated code with LLVM itself, and don't
>> know how to do it. Just as a little test, I've tried compiling the
>> example HowToUseJIT.cpp using llvm-g++, but I get tons of errors.
>>
>>
2006 Sep 14
1
[LLVMdev] use LLVM to convert C++ code to C code
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Hi,<br>
I am newbie to llvm.<br>
<br>
I am unable to generate
2004 Nov 17
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-test portability failures
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Jeff Cohen wrote:
> I updated my source tree and after putting malloc.h back things look a lot better. Still getting a large number of JIT-only failures. There is now only one assertion failure:
>
> /home/cfe/x86/llvm-gcc/bin/g++ -I/usr/home/llvm/obj/projects/llvm-test/MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city
2004 Nov 17
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-test portability failures
I updated my source tree and after putting malloc.h back things look a lot better. Still getting a large number of JIT-only failures. There is now only one assertion failure:
/home/cfe/x86/llvm-gcc/bin/g++ -I/usr/home/llvm/obj/projects/llvm-test/MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city -I/usr/home/llvm/obj/projects/llvm-test/../../../projects/llvm-test/MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city
2005 Feb 26
0
[LLVMdev] Patch to make gccld link natively, revised and extended... again :)
Here is the latest version of the native linker patch.
This differs from the previous patch in one major way... It no longer takes
the crude hack of screening for 'llvm' in the -L path. Instead, gccld now
actively screens for -L paths that contain bytecode shared libraries or true
llvm bytecode archives. Those -L paths that do contain them are omitted from
the call to the system
2005 May 25
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM Cygwin Run Errors
Hi,
I am wondering whether the bytecode generated by my llvm-gcc is correct?
When I run
$ llvm-gcc hello.c -o hello
What I get is hello.exe.bc, and hello.exe (I can actually llvm-dis the
bytecode file which is hello.exe.bc).
However, I do not get a shell script(named hello) as stated in the
documentation...
Best Regards,
Kiat
On 5/25/05, Aaron Gray <angray at beeb.net> wrote:
>
2003 May 22
1
[LLVMdev] allow gcc .... /full/path/to/libfoo.a
gccld would barf if you tried to specify the full pathname of an archive
on the command line to gcc, (e.g., instead of gcc ... -L/full/path/to -lFOO
you say gcc ... /full/path/to/libFOO.a) which many GNU Makefiles try to do.
This patch fixes that.
Ok to commit?
--
gaeke at uiuc.edu
gccld.cpp:
Fix typo in header.
Add IsArchive static method.
Roll LoadLibraryFromDirectory() into
2006 Apr 26
1
[LLVMdev] LLC fail without gccld optimization on spec2000 int benchmarks
Hi,
In my experiments, I need to disable several linking optimizations. However,
bzip2, vortex and eon failed if "-disable-opt" was passed to gccld. I tried
the out-of-box llvm and the building process provided by llvm-test. The same
problem was observed, when I specified EXTRA_LINKTIME_OPT_FLAGS =
-disable-opt on Makefile.program and simplied typed "make" under
2006 Sep 18
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-g++: Internal error
Hi,
i used CVS to checkout the source of llvm and llvm-gcc, compiled and built
them on my machine successfully.
i tried a c-language hello program, it was OK.
But when i tried a c++-language hello program, i got:
~/project/llvm/examples$ llvm-g++ t3.cc -o t3
gccld:
/developer/zsth/project/llvm/src/llvm/lib/Analysis/IPA/CallGraph.cpp:277:
void
2006 Dec 12
1
[LLVMdev] How to compile apps to bc files with the new llvm-gcc4?
Hi,
On 12/11/06, Scott Michel <scottm at rushg.aero.org> wrote:
> Here's where my issue about DTRT with llvm-gcc (or whatever your prefix
> to llvm tools happens to be) resurfaces. I'm keenly aware that Chris
> thinks that one really ought to be careful with having llvm-gcc emit
> bytecode. But frankly, if that's the case, what's the point of emitting
> byte