Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] dejagnu tester"
2005 Nov 12
2
[LLVMdev] building LLVM 1.6 on Debian unstable ...
Marco Matthies wrote:
>> make[2]: Entering directory `/home/sameerds/data/llvm-1.6/tools/llc'
>> llvm[2]: Linking Debug executable llc
>> `.gnu.linkonce.t._ZNK4llvm14TargetLowering12getValueTypeEPKNS_4TypeE'
>> referenced
>> in section `.rodata' of
>> /home/sameerds/data/llvm-1.6/Debug/lib/LLVMSelectionDAG
>> .o: defined in discarded
2005 Apr 10
1
Fwd: Re: [LLVMdev] new IA64 backend
Does anybody know if there is some tool to convert from WHIRL to LLVM? maybe some project under
development? a similar project?
Thanks
>
> --- Duraid Madina <duraid at octopus.com.au> wrote:
> > Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 12:45:54 +0900
> > From: Duraid Madina <duraid at octopus.com.au>
> > To: ahs3 at fc.hp.com, LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at
2005 Mar 17
4
[LLVMdev] new IA64 backend
Hi everyone,
I've just checked in an IA64 backend to LLVM! Be warned, it's pretty
rough right now. Here are some of the known defects:
- No varargs
- No alloca
- No instruction scheduling/bundling of any sort
...or in other words, it breaks often and when it does work, it's a
dog. On the plus side, it _does_ have a tasty new pattern instruction
selector. :) Beyond fixing the
2005 May 11
3
[LLVMdev] LLVM 1.5 Release Plan
Oleg Smolsky wrote:
> I've just tried building CVS/HEAD of llvm using gcc 4.0.0 that I have
> installed to /opt/gcc
... then you should either add /opt/gcc/lib to /etc/ld.so.conf and rerun
ldconfig, or add /opt/gcc/lib to your LD_LIBRARY_PATH . However, GCC 4.x
definitely has issues building LLVM, at least on ia64. If you want to
use LLVM in anger, I'd stick with 3.4 for now.
2005 Mar 18
2
[LLVMdev] new IA64 backend
Andrew Lenharth wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 05:04 +0900, Duraid Madina wrote:
>> - No varargs
>
> What are your issues here? Or are they simply at the "not implemented
> so I don't know" stage?
The two bugs I mentioned (no varargs, no alloca) are pretty much two
sides of the same coin: I'm ignoring the IA64 stack frame layout (for no
good reason), so
2005 Mar 17
0
[LLVMdev] new IA64 backend
On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 05:04 +0900, Duraid Madina wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've just checked in an IA64 backend to LLVM! Be warned, it's pretty
> rough right now. Here are some of the known defects:
>
> - No varargs
What are your issues here? Or are they simply at the "not implemented
so I don't know" stage? Namely, I am working on some varargs
2005 Mar 17
0
[LLVMdev] new IA64 backend
On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 05:04 +0900, Duraid Madina wrote:
> I've just checked in an IA64 backend to LLVM!
Woo hoo! And There Was Much Rejoicing in IA64 Land :-).
--
Ciao,
al
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Al Stone Alter Ego:
Linux & Open Source Lab Debian Developer
Hewlett-Packard
2005 May 11
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM 1.5 Release Plan
Hello Duraid,
Duraid Madina wrote on Wednesday, 11 May 2005:
>> I've just tried building CVS/HEAD of llvm using gcc 4.0.0 that I
>> have installed to /opt/gcc
> ... then you should either add /opt/gcc/lib to /etc/ld.so.conf and
> rerun ldconfig, or add /opt/gcc/lib to your LD_LIBRARY_PATH .
> However, GCC 4.x definitely has issues building LLVM, at least on
> ia64.
Oh,
2005 Nov 12
0
[LLVMdev] building LLVM 1.6 on Debian unstable ...
Sameer D. Sahasrabuddhe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Tried to build the 1.6 release on Debian unstable, but ran into link
> problems for some utils ...
>
> Copying the messages when building llc, the same error occurs for lli,
> llvm-db and some of the examples. Is this a problem with the compiler
> version? LLVMSelectionDAG.o itself builds correctly.
>
> make[2]: Entering
2005 May 18
0
[LLVMdev] Testing Release 1.5
> Itanium
Everything checks out as expected. :)
Duraid
2005 Nov 12
2
[LLVMdev] building LLVM 1.6 on Debian unstable ...
Hi,
Tried to build the 1.6 release on Debian unstable, but ran into link
problems for some utils ...
Copying the messages when building llc, the same error occurs for lli,
llvm-db and some of the examples. Is this a problem with the compiler
version? LLVMSelectionDAG.o itself builds correctly.
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/sameerds/data/llvm-1.6/tools/llc'
llvm[2]: Linking Debug
2004 Dec 30
3
[LLVMdev] Primer with LLVM
Hi, everybody:
I am a beginner with LLVM, in fact today was the first day that I use it.
I have several questions about LLVM:
Can I use LLVM to compile several files (bytecode), scripts (char*) and link
them with external libraries generating *only* one executable (all in
memory)?
Can I invoke externals functions from a guest (LLVM generated) code which
exist in the host code (the code that
2005 Feb 14
0
LLVM February Status Update
Hi Everyone,
Sorry for the long overdue status update, as you might guess, the holidays
have been busy for everyone. :)
Here's your periodic dose of updates on the progress of LLVM, which takes
us from the LLVM 1.4 release until present CVS. I appologize if I forgot
anything!
Big Things:
1. Brian contributed a new SparcV8 backend, which (unlike the SparcV9
backend) uses the
2005 May 17
4
[LLVMdev] Testing Release 1.5
Dear All,
I've finished building binaries for the GCC frontends and am now testing
the 1.5 release branch on i386/Linux, Sparc/Solaris, and PowerPC/MacOS X.
I'm looking for volunteers to test LLVM 1.5 on platforms that we don't
have in house. I'm specifically looking for people who can do:
Itanium
FreeBSD/i386
Windows (Cygwin, MingW, etc)
I'm mainly interested in major
2005 Mar 18
0
[LLVMdev] new IA64 backend
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005, Duraid Madina wrote:
>>> - No instruction scheduling/bundling of any sort
>>
>> So this one needs to be coordinated. Next week, I might see about
>> adding MachineInstruction support to the SelectionDAG so you can load up
>> a DAG post-ISel and then spit it back out scheduled.
>
> That would be much appreciated, particularly if it
2005 May 25
2
[LLVMdev] llc -march=ia64 support
Hi,
For the PyPy project ( http://codespeak.net/pypy ) I am working on the
x64-64 support.
I would like to use llc -march=ia64 to generate the assembly but that is
not supported at the moment.
As a workaround I let llc generate C code that gets compiled, but this
unfortunately is not a good way
to show the power of llvm. A understood this ia64 support will be worked
on soon.
First week of july
2005 May 25
0
[LLVMdev] llc -march=ia64 support
Hi there,
The IA64 architecture, which had its 'official' name changed to the
"Itanium Processor Architecture", *is* supported by llc. I am pretty
sure you are talking about the x86-64 architecture, which has also had
its share of unfortunate name changes and is also known as "AMD64",
"EM64T" and all sorts of things in between. x86-64 is *not* currently
2004 Dec 30
0
[LLVMdev] Primer with LLVM
On Thu, 2004-12-30 at 11:14, Francisco Puentes wrote:
> Hi, everybody:
>
Hi Francisco
>
> I am a beginner with LLVM, in fact today was the first day that I use it.
Welcome!
>
> I have several questions about LLVM:
If you haven't already, a good place to start is the Getting Started
Guide, at http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/GettingStarted.html
> Can I use LLVM to
2005 Jan 09
0
[LLVMdev] Version Control Upgrade?
Hi everyone,
Reid said:
> Of the tools available, it seems that only subversion, arch, and
> monotone are suitable for our purposes. But, we'd love to hear your
> thoughts; especially if you have first-hand experience with these tools.
Apart from using CVS as a client (as everyone does), I've only ever used
Aegis (previous employer, for ~3 years) and Perforce (the employer
2005 May 25
3
[LLVMdev] llc -march=ia64 support
You are right, the machine I am on is a AMD Opteron. I could probably
generate working code for x86, but I am testing the implications of
using 64 bits integers. The four weeks is not really important, it's
just that it would be nice to have really fast code to showcase.
Something related to this: to test the effect of 64 bits integers I
replace all reference of int by long in my .ll file.