similar to: [LLVMdev] Compression Stabilization

Hi, Is there a way in which rsync's -z compression (zlib) utility can be benchmarked? I'm trying to compare the compression ratio between rsync and external compression tools like gzip and bzip2. Are there any advantages to using rsync's internal compression mechanism specified with the -z option compared to solely applying external compression i.e. bzip2 to the files and invoking

Hi, I compressed many files using bzip2, but in some cases it crashes. I believe that it is related to dovecot indexes. How to reproduce: Inside a Maildir folder without any indexes yet, compress a message with bzip2 and tryes to access it. At my server is showed the error: Jun 24 00:18:20 maildev dovecot: IMAP(xxx at xxx): FETCH for mailbox Trash UID 1 failed to read message input: No such

Reid Spencer wrote: > On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 20:43 -0800, Wink Saville wrote: > >>> Try passing "-L/opt/llvm-1.6/llvm-gcc/lib/ -lcrtend" to llvm-ld. >>> >> This didn't work for me: >> llvm-ld -o t1.app t1.bc t1.a -L/opt/llvm-1.6/llvm-gcc/lib/ -lcrtend.a >> >> I get two warning's about library 'crtend' missing

Hello, many linux SW is starting to implement new lzma compresson instrad of old zlib (gzip) od bzip2. lzma is default comrpession in very good compression SW 7-zip, which is faster and have higher compression ratio then bzip2 or rar. Currently its probalby the best compressor in therms of compression and decompression speed / compression ratio. In linux there is GNU lzma SW which implements

A while back I promised to provide some feedback on useful extensions to LLVM to better support source language writers (i.e. those _using_ LLVM, not developing it). Below is a list of the ideas I've come up with so far. As I get more of XPL's compiler done, I'll start diving into each of the these areas. I'm posting early in the hopes that discussion will bear some fruit. In

On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 20:43 -0800, Wink Saville wrote: > > Try passing "-L/opt/llvm-1.6/llvm-gcc/lib/ -lcrtend" to llvm-ld. > This didn't work for me: > llvm-ld -o t1.app t1.bc t1.a -L/opt/llvm-1.6/llvm-gcc/lib/ -lcrtend.a > > I get two warning's about library 'crtend' missing > You didn't get the instructions quite right. The option is

Hi, Where can I find the main function of llvm compiler in the source file? Thanks! -- Shuhan

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Sun, 26 Feb 2006, Wink Saville wrote: >> I then do the following in my makefile: >> >> llvm-gcc -c t1.c -o t1.bc >> llvm-gcc -c t1sub1.c -o t1sub1.bc >> llvm-gcc -c t1sub2.c -o t1sub2.bc >> llvm-ar r t1.a t1sub1.bc t1sub2.bc >> llvm-ar: creating t1.a >> llvm-ld -o t1.app t1.bc t1.a /opt/llvm-1.6/llvm-gcc/lib/libcrtend.a

Reid, Click on any of these logs and you'll see the same asm parsing issues. It's been going on for much of the week. http://llvm.org/nightlytest/machines/2006-12-29_05:40:12-Build-Log.txt http://llvm.org/nightlytest/machines/2006-12-29_05:40:12-Build-Log.txt llvm[4]: Compiling stacker_rt.ll to stacker_rt.bc for Release build (bytecode)

Hello, I've closed PR106 (use automake) as WONTFIX. I've already delineated the problems with automake in previous posts but as of now, all the automake related stuff has been removed from the repository. In an effort to start making our makefile system better, I've committed changes to Makefile.rules and a few library Makefiles that nearly double the speed of our compilations. I

As a side effect of bug 178 (Stacker not handling 64-bit pointers on Solaris), I got thinking about a union type for LLVM. Is there any good reason that LLVM shouldn't support unions? This is essentially a structure that has its members all at the same address rather than at sequential addresses. I know there are various issues with unions (alignment, etc.) but wouldn't it make sense to

Reid Spencer wrote: > Yes, that's right! > > In fact, shortly the process of doing that will get easier with the > llvmc (compiler driver) tool that I'm working on. [another newbie delurks] Hi, Reid. Been tinkering with LLVM about 2 weeks now. I've been using the Stacker Compiler as an example so far for my own little project. Is this tool you mentioned coming

Hi, I am dealing with very large datasets and it takes a long time to save a workspace image. The options to save compressed data are: "gzip", "bzip2" or "xz", the default being gzip. I wonder if it's possible to include the pbzip2 (http://compression.ca/pbzip2/) algorithm as an option when saving. "PBZIP2 is a parallel implementation of the bzip2

Hello, Just wondering: Dovecot has gzip/bzip2 compression/decompression support. According to this: http://stephane.lesimple.fr/wiki/blog/lzop_vs_compress_vs_gzip_vs_bzip2_vs_lzma_vs_lzma2-xz_benchmark_reloaded gzip and bzip2 aren't really useful together. While gzip can offer speed and a reasonable amount of compression ratio, bzip2 is slow, especially on decompression, which Dovecot does

On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, Tobias Nurmiranta wrote: > > Hi, I'm thinking out loud, please give me some feedback. > > Regarding llvm.gcread and llvm.gcwrite, wouldn't it be nicer if they are > implemented as: > > llvm.gcread(sbyte** object, uint offset) > llvm.gcwrite(sbyte* data, sbyte** object, uint offset) > > Where you also have the offset into the object. In

On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Reid Spencer wrote: > As a side effect of bug 178 (Stacker not handling 64-bit pointers on > Solaris), I got thinking about a union type for LLVM. Is there any > good reason that LLVM shouldn't support unions? This is essentially a > structure that has its members all at the same address rather than at > sequential addresses. I know there are various

I found 179 more *.{c,cpp,h} files with tabs. Unfortunately, the tabs stops used vary so blindly expanding them messes up alignment in many cases :( Index: examples/BFtoLLVM/BFtoLLVM.cpp Index: include/llvm/AbstractTypeUser.h Index: include/llvm/GlobalVariable.h Index: include/llvm/InstrTypes.h Index: include/llvm/IntrinsicInst.h Index: include/llvm/ADT/PostOrderIterator.h Index:

On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, Tobias Nurmiranta wrote: > > void *llvm_gc_read(void *ObjPtr, void **FieldPtr) { > > return *FieldPtr; > > } > > Hm, but doesn't FieldPtr need to be calculated target-specific in those > cases? For the field pointer, one could use the getelementptr instruction: %pairty = { sbyte, sbyte, int* } %pairPtr = ... %fieldptr = getelementptr

Hi, i am using Rsync for making backups of a MySQL database. The MySQL files can be compressed about 1:10 and i want to make use of this fact. Rsync currently doesn't support saving files in a compressed state. I personally think this should be a feature for the filesystem (in the sense of "synchronised files") but currently there is no such filesystem for Linux available.

Ok, that makes sense :). , Tobias On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, Tobias Nurmiranta wrote: > > > void *llvm_gc_read(void *ObjPtr, void **FieldPtr) { > > > return *FieldPtr; > > > } > > > > Hm, but doesn't FieldPtr need to be calculated target-specific in those > > cases? > > For the field pointer, one