similar to: [LLVMdev] A few beginner level questions..

On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 23:19, Abhijit Ray wrote: > 1. If we run a few passes in a sequence ..is the bytecode file > transformed after each pass in sequence i.e > > if we have > a) opt -pass1 -pass2 -pass3 < in.bc > out.bc > b)opt -pass1 -pass2 < in.bc > tmp.bc > opt -pass3 < tmp.bc > out.bc > > are the above two equivalent ? Yes, they're

Hi, I have been trying to randomize blocks in a program and modified "BasicBlockPlacement.cpp" for the purpose but getting segmentation fault.I am not able to determine the problem.Can anyone please decrypt these error messages or suggest what might be the possible cause of failure? -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The various intrinsic assert/crashes should all be fixed on mainline CVS (they are PR733, which I just fixed). The only ones that I'm wary of are: XPASS: /proj/llvm/build/../llvm/test/Regression/CFrontend/2004-02-20- StaticRedeclare.c.tr FAIL: /proj/llvm/build/../llvm/test/Regression/CFrontend/2005-12-04- DeclarationLineNumbers.c: In the former case, I would guess that the test isn't

I just updated again (both llvm and llvm-gcc). The only thing that changed was: P test/Regression/CFrontend/2005-12-04-DeclarationLineNumbers.c The regression test below was done *with* your llvm-gcc changes to llvm- expand.c. I don't know what the failures are all about, but I will try it again. If its the same, I'll let you know. Reid. On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 16:20 -0500, Chris Lattner

On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Tanu Sharma wrote: > I have been trying to randomize blocks in a program and modified > "BasicBlockPlacement.cpp" for the purpose but getting segmentation > fault.I am not able to determine the problem.Can anyone please decrypt > these error messages or suggest what might be the possible cause of > failure? I'd be happy to fix this, but I need

I got the following error in 1.5 release. As far as installation is concerned, everything went fine. llc hello.bc -o hello.bs llc((anonymous namespace)::PrintStackTrace()+0x17)[0xd435f1] llc((anonymous namespace)::SignalHandler(int)+0xbd)[0xd437ff] /lib64/tls/libc.so.6[0x3ff522e410] llc(llvm::Type::isFirstClassType() const+0x13)[0x8fc38d] llc(llvm::FunctionType::FunctionType(llvm::Type const*,

Here's what's left on Linux (GCC 4.1.0), after all updates that went into the branch: Running /proj/llvm/build/../llvm/test/Regression/CFrontend/dg.exp ... FAIL: /proj/llvm/build/../llvm/test/Regression/CFrontend/2004-02-12- LargeAggregateCopy.c.tr: gccas: /proj/llvm/build/../llvm/lib/VMCore/Function.cpp:266: unsigned int llvm::Function::getIntrinsicID() const: Assertion `0 &&

Thanks a lot for replying Chris, I m trying to randomize the blocks in a program.I generate a random number( between the current "InsertPos" and the last block), and then iterate through the list of basicblocks , picking up block with position equal to that of the random number and place it into the current InsertPos and increment InsertPos. Running it like this:

OK, I noticed a few problems with my previous email, so I will boil the question down: What I want to do is compile for x86 and ia64 from darwin. I also want to load my own passes into opt and llc. Should I be using llvmc at all here, or should I be doing something like llvmgcc -> gccas -> opt -> llc ? I've given up on the filetype=obj argument, so now the problem is that llc is

>> Is attached patch acceptable? > > Looks great, applied, thanks! > http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20050131/023931.html Thanks! >> Also I have in Makefile.rules (but not include in patch) some >> modification for simplify used common Makefile.rules in LLVM projects and >> non-LLVM project (guarding some LLVM specific parts by ifdef

On Thu, 13 Apr 2006, Reid Spencer wrote: > I just updated again (both llvm and llvm-gcc). The only thing that > changed was: > P test/Regression/CFrontend/2005-12-04-DeclarationLineNumbers.c > > The regression test below was done *with* your llvm-gcc changes to llvm- > expand.c. I don't know what the failures are all about, but I will try > it again. If its the same,

Hi, Now, I've build the tools and the cfe. However, 'make check' gave me the attached results. Summarized as follows: # of expected passes 1081 # of unexpected failures 26 # of expected failures 32 I configured llvm with following options: '--prefix=/home/hb/llvm/ --enable-targets=host-only'. I used gcc version 3.4.2 to build the tools and cfe. The cfe is version:

Branches have been created. You are free to checkin to cvs head again. I'll send mail once I have the prerelease tar balls up. Please continue to review and revise the documentation. I can fold this into the release later. Thanks, Tanya On Thu, 13 Apr 2006, Tanya Lattner wrote: > > I will be creating the release branch at 1:00pm PDT. Please refrain from > checking in from

I will be creating the release branch at 1:00pm PDT. Please refrain from checking in from 1:00-1:30pm. I will send email once I am done. Thanks, Tanya

Hi, Thank Brian Gaeke so much. Following TraceBasicBlocks.cpp, I modified the code as below and could insert instruction or function I need into anywhere in Module. But it works well without BB->getInstList().push_back(InstrCall), and if I add the BB->getInstList().push_back() following new CallInst(), I got error information when runing opt. What is the reason for it? And is it necessary

Hi, I'm having some problems cross-compiling from ppc (OS X) to x86 object files and to ia64, at all. I'd appreciate some advice as to whether or not I'm actually supposed to be able to do this, and what's wrong if so. Here's how I configured it: ../llvm-darcslocal/llvm/configure --with-llvmgccdir=$LLVMGCCDIR --prefix=$HOME/Documents/hpcl/LLVM/install The results work fine

Cyrille Mescam wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 11:02:10AM -0500, John Criswell wrote: > >>Cyrille Mescam wrote: >> [snip] > > In fact, i am using the CFE build procedures. I am on instructions 5. > > cyrille > Okay, I took a closer look at your output. I was correct in that gccas is attempting to assemble a native PPC assembly language file. However,

Hi Henrik, You don't have the latest C/C++ Front End Source code. Please update from CVS to get the fix for the 2005-06-15-ExpandGotoInternalProblem.c test. Note the date of the test (5 days ago). Reid. On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 18:42 +0200, Henrik Bach wrote: > Hi, > > Now, I've build the tools and the cfe. However, 'make check' gave me the > attached results.

On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 11:02:10AM -0500, John Criswell wrote: > Cyrille Mescam wrote: > >Hi, > > > > > >When compiling the cfrontend for Linux/PPC architecture on a powermac > >G5, i got > >the following error : > > I hate to ask a silly question, but are you using "make bootstrap" to > build the cfrontend? Your output looks like gccas

Hi Reid, Now, I've removed the file and updated the source tree with this command: cvs -z3 -d :pserver:anon at llvm-cvs.cs.uiuc.edu:/var/cvs/llvm update -PdR llvm However, the file still exits. Henrik. >From: Reid Spencer >Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 10:57:54 -0700 > >Hi Henrik, > >You don't have the latest C/C++ Front End Source code. Please update >from CVS to get