similar to: [LLVMdev] Re: questions about LLVM

Hi Shuo, I am CCing your questions to the LLVM developers list so others can reply or correct me. >I have a few questions about LLVM: >(1) The LLVM tutorial says LLVM can be used in architecture research. If >I want to run my program on an instruction set defined by myself, is LLVM >a right tool to do that? > I don't think so. >In this aspect, is LLVM similar to

Shuo Chen wrote: >Prof. Adve, > >The idea is to develop a memory model where each byte is extended with >3 extra bits. Programs are running on this memory model. >Load/store instructions, including those in LibC functions, >needs to deal with the extra bits in a certain manner. Basically, my >questions are: >(1) Is it feasible to implement the memory model where each

Prof. Adve, The idea is to develop a memory model where each byte is extended with 3 extra bits. Programs are running on this memory model. Load/store instructions, including those in LibC functions, needs to deal with the extra bits in a certain manner. Basically, my questions are: (1) Is it feasible to implement the memory model where each byte is extended with 3 extra bit? (2) Is there a

On Mar 12, 2007, at 10:34 AM, Fabian Scheler wrote: > After playing around a bit with LLVM, I > decided to use LLVM, because of its great documentation, its clean and > straight-forward design and it because it seems to be easily > applicable also for beginners. A gratuitous plug for a recent research project: If you use LLVM, you can also get a compiler called SAFECode that (a)

Here's some stuff that may be useful for your papers n stuph: * Analyze has a pass "-instcount" written by Dinakar, which will tell you things like the number of functions, basic blocks, and instructions are in a program. It will even classify the instructions into different opcodes, if you want to report things like #loads+#stores or something. * Most of the olden

On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, Chris Lattner wrote: > > Yes, this makes a tremendous amount of sense. Do you think you could > prepare some patches to make this happen? If you have any questions, feel > free to ask :) Ok, a patch[1] is attached. I didn't care to coerce the offset, since I assume that it is an uint, but maybe I should? Hopefully I've understood the llvm source

Shuo, >> I have a few questions about LLVM: >> (1) The LLVM tutorial says LLVM can be used in architecture research. >> If I want to run my program on an instruction set defined by myself, >> is LLVM a right tool to do that? What kind of instruction set do you have in mind? The closer it is to one we already target, the easier this is, but it is quite possible to

Hi, Thanks for the replies in the mailing list. I made some progress in building LLVM, but I still have a problem about ELF class. I am working with LLVM on a sparcv9 machine, while the gcc is configured to emit 32-bit binary by default. After executing "configure --with-llvmgccdir=... --enable-jit", I modified Makefile.config so it contains CXX = g++ -mcpu=v9 -m64 CC := gcc -mcpu=v9

Ok, here's the new patch. (Please tell me if I shouldn't mail patches directly on the mailing list.) While I was editing LowerGC.cpp I made a little test (not part of this patch, but the diff with LowerGC.cpp in cvs is attached). I've added a new intrinsic called llvm.gcroot_value(sbyte*, sbyte*), which takes a pointer directly instead and transforms it into an alloca. The idea is the

Hi, I am working with llvm 1.3 on a sparcv9 machine. I have successfully built llvm and llvm-gcc frontend. I can run many tools including llvmgcc, llvm-dis, and llc. After using /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc to assemble .s file into a program binary, I can run the binary correctly as well. I am interested in the JIT compiler (lli). When I directly run the LLVM bytecode using interpretation ("lli

Hi Everyone, Sorry for the long overdue status update, as you might guess, the holidays have been busy for everyone. :) Here's your periodic dose of updates on the progress of LLVM, which takes us from the LLVM 1.4 release until present CVS. I appologize if I forgot anything! Big Things: 1. Brian contributed a new SparcV8 backend, which (unlike the SparcV9 backend) uses the

On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 06:22:34PM -0400, Shukang Zhou wrote: > I am working with llvm 1.3 on a sparcv9 machine. I have successfully > built llvm and llvm-gcc frontend. I can run many tools including > llvmgcc, llvm-dis, and llc. After using /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc to > assemble .s file into a program binary, I can run the binary correctly > as well. > > I am interested in the

Some wheird problem, Target/X86 builds okay now. But there seems to be another problem with the Cygwin build :- make[4]: Entering directory `/usr/build/llvm/lib/Target/SparcV9/ModuloScheduling' llvm[4]: Compiling ModuloSchedulingSuperBlock.cpp for Debug build /usr/src/llvm/lib/Target/SparcV9/ModuloScheduling/ModuloSchedulingSuperBlock.cpp : In member function `virtual bool

hi list this is as probably more of networking problem than an icecast problem but it is related - hope people don't mind. I've been running tests for a project that starts 20 August. I'm sending stream from my audio software to a local icecast server, then relaying this to a commercial shoutcast service. Initially i was using 7000 for the relay port. Worked fine. Then one morning

Hi, I attempted to build v3.3 using Sun Studio 12, but it failed right out of the gate. It looks like it can't find the standard libraries, but according to the make output, it's looking in the right places. Would someone please clue me in as to what I'm missing? Thanks. -John Using FLAGS = -I/opt/heimdal/include -I/usr/sfw/include/openssl -g -xs -xtarget=ultraT1

I found 179 more *.{c,cpp,h} files with tabs. Unfortunately, the tabs stops used vary so blindly expanding them messes up alignment in many cases :( Index: examples/BFtoLLVM/BFtoLLVM.cpp Index: include/llvm/AbstractTypeUser.h Index: include/llvm/GlobalVariable.h Index: include/llvm/InstrTypes.h Index: include/llvm/IntrinsicInst.h Index: include/llvm/ADT/PostOrderIterator.h Index:

Overall the build process for dovecot is very clean. I did however run into a significant problem when it came to locating the mysql libraries, especially when building a 64 bit executable but similar problems occured building a 32 bit executable. I am describing the 64 bit build issues below since that is the worst case scenario. Fixing the 64 bit build will automatically fix the 32 bit

I recently patched my Solaris server and suddenly my Samba service is not working correctly. When Anyone accesses a samba share the samba daemon panics and shuts down. Solaris than restarts the system, unless there are multiple panics simultaneously than the service is placed in maintenance mode. The SAMBA server is a stand alone supporting a dozen end users for a large file store behind the

I recently patched my Solaris server and suddenly my Samba service is not working correctly. When Anyone accesses a samba share the samba daemon panics and shuts down. Solaris than restarts the system, unless there are multiple panics simultaneously than the service is placed in maintenance mode. The SAMBA server is a stand alone supporting a dozen end users for a large file store behind the

Hi, I am trying to compile R-2.2.1 on Solaris 2.9 with a 64-bit build. Following the instructions in "R Installation and Adminstration", I changed the following settings in "config.site": CC="gcc -m64" F77="g77 -64" CXX="g++ -m64" LDFLAGS="-L/usr/local/lib/sparcv9 -L/usr/local/lib" But I got the following error messages: