similar to: [LLVMdev] Final Visual Studio Patches

On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 10:25:39 +0100 "Henrik Bach" <henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com> wrote: > I've come over an open source script which should be able to convert unix > (gnu?) like makefiles to nmake. However, It possible needs some changes to > work with the llvm makefile framework. I'm very doubtful this utility is of any use. nmake is useless compared to gnu

Jeff Cohen wrote: > On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 10:25:39 +0100 > "Henrik Bach" <henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com> wrote: > > >>I've come over an open source script which should be able to convert unix >>(gnu?) like makefiles to nmake. However, It possible needs some changes to >>work with the llvm makefile framework. > > > I'm very

I've come over an open source script which should be able to convert unix (gnu?) like makefiles to nmake. However, It possible needs some changes to work with the llvm makefile framework. Until then, I strongly suggest a repository for the msvc project files until we'll come with a lasting solution. It is natural that we, msvc guys, should keep these files in shape. Henrik.

>From: "Henrik Bach" <henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com> >Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 18:10:29 +0200 > >>From: Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> >>Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 07:25:11 -0700 >> >>On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 12:46:31 +0200 >>"Henrik Bach" <henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> > >From: Jeff Cohen

>From: Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> >Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 07:25:11 -0700 > >On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 12:46:31 +0200 >"Henrik Bach" <henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com> wrote: > > > >From: Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> > > >Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 21:24:47 -0700 > > > > > > > > >But there are some

I agree completely with you, Jeff. However, I think it somehow would be nice, if you guys could tell comming users that the win32 solution is geared toward VC++ 7.1 (and hence use of other tools are at their own risk). And, I think it also would be really cool, if you guys come up with a solution how to handle multiple VC++ x solutions/projects from the same source, possibly ranging from VC

On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 12:46:31 +0200 "Henrik Bach" <henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com> wrote: > >From: Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> > >Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 21:24:47 -0700 > > > > > >But there are some issues with System I'm going to have to take care of > >besides using Win32. There appears to be some Unix assumptions like the

>From: Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> > >Uh... shouldn't a Win32 port use the Win32 API? > Well, as I see it LLVM contains only tools that are perfectably manageble through a shell. And in this respect, I see the win32/mingw port perfectably achieves this at the moment. >On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 02:11:51 +0200 >"Henrik Bach" <henrik_bach_llvm at

>From: Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> >Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 15:26:56 -0700 > >Yes. You need to link with dbghelp.lib and psapi.lib. There are >pragmas to force this, but not surprisingly gcc does not honor Microsoft >pragmas. I can't find the above libs. Where are they located on your system? Are there any dll pendants? Henrik

>From: Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> >Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:05:16 -0700 > >They are part of the Platform SDK from Microsoft, part of Visual Studio. >They correspond to Window system DLLs dbghelp.dll and psapi.dll in Arrrggg, I forget this relation... >\winnt\system32. If you do not have these libs, then you are out of >luck. Mingw should have provided them

On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 19:59:01 +0200 "Henrik Bach" <henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com> wrote: > >From: Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> > >Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 10:35:36 -0700 > > > > >What's a "compiling mesh?" > > What I meant, was that there are some implicit defines in mingw (like __GCC) > and vcX (like _MVC) but

I think the $HOME and /etc assumptions are very limited in nature. Most of us who use LLVM every day here at UIUC don't need to bother installing anything in $HOME or /etc, and so they shouldn't be considered a major stumbling block for building a version of LLVM that runs on Windows, no matter how it is done or what libraries it is linked with. Making it possible to build LLVM on

Hi Jeff, We need to get getDirectoryContents and renameFile implemented from Unix/Path.cpp in Win32/Path.cpp, otherwise I can't get llvm-ar linked. Henrik. ============================================================= Henrik Bach Open Source Developer e-mail: henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com ============================================================= Got Freedom? Software Freedom Day

Hi Chris and Vikram, Thank you for your acknowlegdement of my and the other external contributors work, in your latest presentation of LLVM on Compiler Research Infrastructures: "The LLVM Compiler Framework and Infrastructure Tutorial", albeit we have done a little (except Reid) compared with you true unsung heroes at the LLVM team. Henrik

Hi, To link gccld it needs this patch to Path.cpp, too. Henrik. ============================================================= Henrik Bach Open Source Developer e-mail: henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com ============================================================= Got Freedom? Software Freedom Day 2004 - 28th of August http://www.softwarefreedomday.org/

I successfully build llvm from cvs using vs2005 and stlport. I also had a couple of issues, but most were due to outdated project files. I also had to implement code for the alloca instruction. On 3/10/07, Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> wrote: > > The recent issues concern the head revision, post 1.9. As no one has > ever submitted patches to fix 2005 problems with the 1.9

llvmdev-request at cs.uiuc.edu wrote: >Send LLVMdev mailing list submissions to > llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > llvmdev-request at cs.uiuc.edu > >You can reach the person managing the list at

Can Microsoft Visual Studio be a good tool for making a backend for an architecture? Thanks, Seung ---- Original message ---- >Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:44:48 -0700 >From: Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> >Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM with Microsoft Visual Studio >To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > >Andreas Fredriksson wrote: >>

>From: Reid Spencer Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:23:49 -0800 > >Nope, unless "make" is an alias for "make -j 4" (like I have) make is make for me. > >Could you try using TOOL_VERBOSE=1 with make to get more output ? I've attached an output. Henrik. >Did you try just running the llvm-ar command by itself ? >If not, could you and give it the V (capital

============================================================= Henrik Bach LLVM Open Source Developer e-mail: henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com ============================================================= 'Nothing is impossible; The impossible just takes longer time :)' - Inventor of a new energy saver light bulp from Denmark. No software patents - Thank you Poland: