similar to: [LLVMdev] New Library Names (IMPORTANT)

'collect2.exe' is an internal version of 'ld' called by GCC The GCC command line is :- g++ -I/usr/build/llvm-2/tools/llc -I/usr/src/llvm/tools/llc -I/usr/build/llvm-2/ include -I/usr/src/llvm/include -I/usr/build/llvm-2/include -I/usr/src/llvm/incl ude -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -Wall -W -Wwrite-strings -Wno-unused -g -D_DEBUG -v -o /usr/build/llvm-2/Debug/bin/llc.exe

Reid added some nice inter-library dependency data to utils/llvm- config/LibDeps.txt. There are three sets of circular dependencies between LLVM libraries. If you use any library from one of these sets, you may need to pull in the rest: LLVMCodeGen.o LLVMSelectionDAG.o libLLVMAnalysis.a libLLVMTarget.a libLLVMTransformUtils.a libLLVMipa.a LLVMSparcV9.o LLVMSparcV9InstrSched.o

Hi Eric, Its definitely amusing :) About the only thing I can suggest are: 1. Combine LLVMSparc*.o into one LLVMSparc.a. That work is already happening with the new Sparc backend that is being developed. Should be out in 1.7 (Chris?) 2. Combine the JIT/Interpreter/ExecutionEngine into one .a I don't know enough about the codegen/target/analysis/ipa stuff to be able to make any

Reid, Getting the same error again :-( /usr/gcc/gcc-3.4.3/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/3.4.3/collect2.exe -Bdynamic --dl l-search-prefix=cyg -o /usr/build/llvm-2/Debug/bin/llc.exe /lib/crt0.o -L/usr/bu ild/llvm-2/Debug/lib -L/usr/build/llvm-2/Debug/bin -L/usr/gcc/gcc-3.4.3/lib/gcc/ i686-pc-cygwin/3.4.3 -L/usr/gcc/gcc-3.4.3/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/3.4.3/../../..

On Tue, 21 Mar 2006, Reid Spencer wrote: > About the only thing I can suggest are: > > 1. Combine LLVMSparc*.o into one LLVMSparc.a. That work is already > happening with the new Sparc backend that is being developed. Should be > out in 1.7 (Chris?) I wouldn't worry about the SparcV9 backend for your project. > 2. Combine the JIT/Interpreter/ExecutionEngine into one .a

On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Chris Lattner wrote: > > Could someone please add this file to the LLVM docs directory so I can > > submit patches against it? BTW, here's some hints for it: libtransforms.a -> contains only the level raise pass libtarget.a -> contains code generator support for describing target architectures libanalysis.a -> intraprocedural analyses libipa.a

Hi LLVMers, I can't figure out why these errors exits: ------------------------- llvm[2]: Linking Debug executable opt c:/projects/build/MinGW/llvm-4-1/Debug/lib/LLVMProfilePaths.o(.text$_ZN4llvm10BranchInstC1EPNS_10BasicBlockES2_+0x52): In function `ZN9__gnu_cxx13new_allocatorISt13_Rb_tree_nodeISt4pairIKPN4llvm8FunctionEPNS3_5GraphEEEE10deallocateEPSA_j':

Erick, I see the problem. The llvm-config linker options are baked into the ocaml library, which is good. But for the execution engine, that link line includes the full paths to some .o files. Those paths come from llvm-config, and they vary before and after installation. (Before install, they point into the source tree as you're seeing.) You could theoretically get working

In trying to package up LLVM for Debian, it appears that x86_64 is no longer a supported architecture -- so, my first question is, is that correct? Best I can tell, the only thing that's supposed to work for x86_64 is the C backend. For Debian, I need to build everything from scratch. When trying to build llvm-gcc4 from source, though, I get part way through the build and am told that

Hi John, Thank you for the comments. I am addressing some of them bellow. Regards, Samuel 2014-08-11 9:36 GMT-04:00 John Leidel (jleidel) <jleidel at micron.com>: > Sergey [et.al], thanks for putting this proposal together. Overall, this > looks like a pretty solid approach to providing relatively hardware > agnostic omp target functionality. I had several comments/questions

> On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 17:33, John Criswell wrote: > > What would be better yet is to modify the code so that it does not use > > alloca() at all. There seems to be little reason to use it aside from > > convenience (but perhaps I have missed something). > > I think the idea is that alloca can give (probably significant) > performance gains when used properly.

Hi, Would anyone object to my moving the TargetRegisterInfo and TargetInstrInfo classes into libCodeGen? TargetInstrInfo is already halfway there with its TargetInstrInfoImpl class implementing most shared functionality. The lib/Target/TargetInstrInfo.cpp file has two remaining functions that happen to not depend on libCodeGen, but I don't think they serve any purpose as part of libTarget.

On Dec 5, 2013, at 5:14 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote: > Right. On the flip side, some passes should be able to make hard queries against target/subtarget that fail if the driver doesn’t initialize them. I don’t want any way to accidentally run the vectorizer or LSR without

Hi, My recent refactoring of the (machine-dependent) use of <alloca.h> does not attempt to change CWriter's behavior of emitting a #include for <alloca.h>. FreeBSD does not have <alloca.h>, so this would cause trouble. We could change it to emit an #ifndef __FreeBSD__...#endif around #include <alloca.h>. I suggest this because, I'm guessing, whether or not the

Brian R. Gaeke wrote: > Hi, > > My recent refactoring of the (machine-dependent) use of <alloca.h> > does not attempt to change CWriter's behavior of emitting a #include > for <alloca.h>. FreeBSD does not have <alloca.h>, so this would cause > trouble. > > We could change it to emit an #ifndef __FreeBSD__...#endif around > #include

On Nov 27, 2012, at 10:24 AM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk> wrote: > Would anyone object to my moving the TargetRegisterInfo and TargetInstrInfo classes into libCodeGen? > > TargetInstrInfo is already halfway there with its TargetInstrInfoImpl class implementing most shared functionality. The lib/Target/TargetInstrInfo.cpp file has two remaining functions that happen

I keep getting this error upon building: > Linking CXX executable ../../bin/opt > ../../lib/libLLVMTarget.so: error: undefined reference to > 'llvm::TargetInstrInfo::getNumMicroOps(llvm::InstrItineraryData > const*, llvm::MachineInstr const*) const' > ../../lib/libLLVMTarget.so: error: undefined reference to >

On Jun 8, 2012, at 12:52 PM, Marc J. Driftmeyer <mjd at reanimality.com> wrote: > I keep getting this error upon building: > >> Linking CXX executable ../../bin/opt >> ../../lib/libLLVMTarget.so: error: undefined reference to 'llvm::TargetInstrInfo::getNumMicroOps(llvm::InstrItineraryData const*, llvm::MachineInstr const*) const' >>

On Nov 27, 2012, at 11:23 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > On Nov 27, 2012, at 10:24 AM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk> wrote: >> Would anyone object to my moving the TargetRegisterInfo and TargetInstrInfo classes into libCodeGen? >> >> TargetInstrInfo is already halfway there with its TargetInstrInfoImpl class implementing most

I've run into a problem with the ocaml bindings and the jit. It builds fine without the jit, but when I try to include it it tries to use the c object files from the build location, instead of the install location: > llvm-config --libdir --libfiles engine /opt/local/lib /opt/local/lib/LLVMX86.o /opt/local/lib/libLLVMSelectionDAG.a /opt/local/lib/libLLVMCodeGen.a