similar to: [LLVMdev] dist-check implemented

If you're on the new Makefile system, you will want to update your Makefile.rules. The patch below provides some important fixes for parallel builds and dependencies. It also adds some new features like the -local targets. For example, you can now build "all-local" to build the local directory without recursing into subdirectories. See the comments below for details of the change.

yue wrote: > hi, > about [LLVMdev] another question > > thanks > > yueqiang One other thing you might want to try is to put your object tree in a directory that is *not* inside of your source tree. Currently, we don't support using separate object trees that are subdirectories of the source tree. In other words: Will work: ========== SRC_ROOT=/home/yue/llvm

Hi John, I have attached my Makefile.config. I noticed that I did'nt have SRC_ROOT and OBJ_ROOT variables defined as such in my environment. But I noticed that this is defined in the Makefile.config by default to the same values. All the same, I tried defining both these variables in my .cshrc, but I still get the same error. The main directory for me is /home/llvm, and I have

Folks, If you're working from CVS sources and have updated recently, you should know that the Makefiles now place the tools in a different directory. This may affect your path. Three changes were made in resolving PR456: 1. $BUILD_OBJ_ROOT/lib/Debug --> $BUILD_OBJ_ROOT/Debug/lib 2. $BUILD_OBJ_ROOT/tools/Debug --> $BUILD_OBJ_ROOT/Debug/bin 3. Example programs are now placed in

Hi, In buildling XPS using LLVM's makefile system, I'm finding that there's a few things lacking in our support for LLVM-based projects. The items below should help but may require changes to project makefiles. I thought I'd check before just going and doing it. 1. Various autoconf generated variables (e.g. abs_top_srcdir) are set in the makefiles but not used. They

Hello, I've closed PR106 (use automake) as WONTFIX. I've already delineated the problems with automake in previous posts but as of now, all the automake related stuff has been removed from the repository. In an effort to start making our makefile system better, I've committed changes to Makefile.rules and a few library Makefiles that nearly double the speed of our compilations. I

The proposed makefile changes have been committed. If you are working from CVS head and you use the LLVM Makefile System in your own project, please make a note of the following: 1. If your makefiles use any BUILD_* variables, they now need to be prefixed with PROJ_ instead of BUILD_. For example, BUILD_SRC_ROOT is now PROJ_SRC_ROOT. 2. There are additional requirements

I found use old BUILD_OBJ_ROOT/BUILD_SRC_ROOT in comment in llvm/Makefile.common and in llvm/projects/Stacker/test/Makefile code. I update it to PROJ_* in attached patches. Vladimir -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Makefile.common.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 1081 bytes Desc: not available URL:

The proposed makefile changes have been committed. If you are working from CVS head and you use the LLVM Makefile System in your own project, please make a note of the following: 1. If your makefiles use any BUILD_* variables, they now need to be prefixed with PROJ_ instead of BUILD_. For example, BUILD_SRC_ROOT is now PROJ_SRC_ROOT. 2. There are additional requirements for projects.

The llvm.cs.uiuc.edu site does not seem to be updating at the moment so it contains the old instructions. If you're looking for the new instructions on the Projects.html page, you can view them here: http://illuvium.net/docs/Projects.html Reid. On Sat, 2005-01-15 at 18:30, Reid Spencer wrote: > The proposed makefile changes have been committed. If you are working > from CVS head and

Hi Reid, just a quick note while you're doing this, a while ago I ran into a problem that the standard makefiles weren't building libraries (like, say, a new pass) correctly on OS X - they were being built as shared libraries and not bundles, so they couldn't be loaded with dlopen. The discussion is in the archives if you want more details... I fixed it locally by doing the following

I have committed changes to Makefile.rules (and others) that will assist in building releases or distributions. The new "dist" target will first perform a "make check" to ensure that all the software builds and that basic sanity checks pass (none have been implemented). If that succeeds, then the directory structure is traversed again for the "distdir" target which

On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, Reid Spencer wrote: > In buildling XPS using LLVM's makefile system, I'm finding that there's > a few things lacking in our support for LLVM-based projects. The items > below should help but may require changes to project makefiles. I > thought I'd check before just going and doing it. ok. > 1. Various autoconf generated variables (e.g.

hi, when i change the OBJ_ROOT and recompile the llvm, it's successful. but run following test, then the error occues: ----------------------------------------------------- [yue at RH9 obj]$ make -C ./test/Programs make: Entering directory `/home/yue/llvm/obj/test/Programs' make[1]: Entering directory `/home/yue/llvm/obj/test/Programs/SingleSource' make[2]: Entering directory

Jeff & others A couple words on how lib/System works that might help you. 1. The configure script identifies the build host and puts it in the $build variable. We use that to determine the basic kind of platform and put it in a variable named $OS. The value of $OS can be: Linux, FreeBSD, Interix, SunOS, Darwin, etc. 2. The platform name is used to create a link from

Hi, In my experiments, I need to disable several linking optimizations. However, bzip2, vortex and eon failed if "-disable-opt" was passed to gccld. I tried the out-of-box llvm and the building process provided by llvm-test. The same problem was observed, when I specified EXTRA_LINKTIME_OPT_FLAGS = -disable-opt on Makefile.program and simplied typed "make" under

Hi all, llvm-test fails on me in the first test (and many subsequent tests, but I hope that fixing the first test will allow me to continue). I see syntax errors from the C compiler and core dumps from llc. Is any of this supposed to happen? This is still on my amd64 machine. However, the build process is using the right incantation to compile (gcc-4.2 -m32 -Wl,-melf_i386). The llvm-gcc

> >  But I got the error message below, > > > > --- > > 2012-04-12 02:39:48: executing test modules > > 2012-04-12 02:39:49: loading nightly test data... > > nt.py:737: fatal error: nightly test failed, no report generated > > --- > > > >  Any idea on how I can figure out what the fatal error is? Thanks! > > Inside the sandbox there will

Hi everyone, sorry to bother you guys. I’m moving a linux application that uses LLVM from version 3.0 to 3.2, and I’m getting a relocation error that I didn’t used to get with the older version of LLVM. I believe that I correctly turned on fPIC, but I’m getting this warning anyway: /usr/bin/ld: /scratch/thirdparty/default/lib/libLLVMBitReader.a(BitcodeReader.o): relocation R_X86_64_PC32

Please ignore, I think this is an issue with an older version of binutils. ________________________________ From: Damien D Neff Sent: 1/4/2013 1:25 PM To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Help with linking llvm 3.2 into an .so Hi everyone, sorry to bother you guys. I’m moving a linux application that uses LLVM from version 3.0 to 3.2, and I’m getting a relocation error that I didn’t used to get