similar to: [LLVMdev] How to solve missing srand48/lrand48/drand48?

Morten, have a look at the http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2004-September/002235.html thread... On Oct 19, 2004, at 2:40 PM, Morten Ofstad wrote: > These calls are in ExternalCalls.cpp, they are platform dependent > calls, so maybe llvm should consider including it's own implementation > of a random number generator? For the time being I just replaced with > calls

Please, take a look on the discussion from Reid and Chris: http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2004-September/002243.html >From: Morten Ofstad <morten at hue.no> >Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 14:40:17 +0200 > >These calls are in ExternalCalls.cpp, they are platform dependent calls, so >maybe llvm should consider including it's own implementation of a random >number

> Hi, > > There's no HAVE_RAND48 symbol provided by autoconf. You'll have to add > the appropriate check to autoconf/configure.ac before we can take this > patch. Sorry I forgot to mention I didn't make any changes to the configure script. The problem is that I can't test these things since I'm not on a Unix platform, and I'm not even using the

Morten Ofstad wrote: >> Hi, >> >> There's no HAVE_RAND48 symbol provided by autoconf. You'll have to >> add the appropriate check to autoconf/configure.ac before we can take >> this patch. I installed autoconf with cygwin now and I think I've managed to do this right now -- there are some strange problems with running the AutoRegen.sh script, so I

Here I am again... I missed that in the previous diff, they are the usual missing <algorithm> and the std:: namespace missing in sort, find, make_pair. Alkis can you please give them an eye when you have time? The next major problem is that VC has only int rand(void) void srand( int seed ) So I donno how to compile the ExecutionEngine/Interpreter/ExternalFunctions.cpp that refers to the

Hmm, I guess I need a sys::Math::getRandom() function that uses a "good" random number generator on the given platform. I'll make a note of this and tuck it away for future implementation. Reid. Chris Lattner wrote: > On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Paolo Invernizzi wrote: > > >>The next major problem is that VC has only >> >>int rand(void) >>void srand(

On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Paolo Invernizzi wrote: > The next major problem is that VC has only > > int rand(void) > void srand( int seed ) > > So I donno how to compile the > ExecutionEngine/Interpreter/ExternalFunctions.cpp that refers to the > drand48 srand48 lrand48 etc series... > For now I hacked them, like > > double drand48(void) { return (float) rand() /

-------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: diff.txt URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20041025/d290c6e0/attachment.txt>

On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > > On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Paolo Invernizzi wrote: > >>The next major problem is that VC has only > >> > >>int rand(void) > >>void srand( int seed ) > >> > >>So I donno how to compile the > >>ExecutionEngine/Interpreter/ExternalFunctions.cpp that refers to the > >>drand48 srand48

On Oct 25, 2004, at 3:41 AM, Morten Ofstad wrote: > Index: lib/ExecutionEngine/Interpreter/ExternalFunctions.cpp > =================================================================== > RCS file: > /var/cvs/llvm/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/Interpreter/ > ExternalFunctions.cpp,v > retrieving revision 1.78 > diff -u -r1.78 ExternalFunctions.cpp > ---

On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, Henrik Bach wrote: > when building the llvm cfe (3.4 derivative), for the mingw platform, I get > this error: 'error: there are no arguments to `lrand48' that depend on a > template parameter, so a declaration of `lrand48' must be available'. Hi Henrik, We haven't modified the GCC configure script or build system, so I don't know what

This sounds suspiciously like the problem I ran into with VC++, whose std implementation also includes _Distance. Could mingw have copied VC++ too closely? The fix with VC++ was to add a "using std::_Distance" line (or just "using namespace std". Chris Lattner wrote: > On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, Henrik Bach wrote: > >> when building the llvm cfe (3.4 derivative), for

Hi, when building the llvm cfe (3.4 derivative), for the mingw platform, I get this error: 'error: there are no arguments to `lrand48' that depend on a template parameter, so a declaration of `lrand48' must be available'. ------------------------ make[3]: Entering directory `/C/projects/build/MinGW/llvm-gcc-1-1/i686-pc-mingw32/libstdc++-v3/testsuite'

-fcommon is not default anymore, with GCC 10 you get the following failure without it: KLIBCLD usr/klibc/libc.so ppc-linux-ld: usr/klibc/globals.o:/root/packages/klibc-2.0.7/usr/klibc/../include/unistd.h:15: multiple definition of `environ'; usr/klibc/__shared_init.o:/root/ldb_base/ofl/packages/klibc-2.0.7/usr/klibc/libc_init.c:42: first defined here ppc-linux-ld:

Hi All, I am first time trying build CLANG+LLVM using cmake+ninja build system. I updated all my CLANG+LLVM sources to current trunk, and I successfully built it using classic *make* build system. But, trying to build the same with cmake+ninja build system resulting in following build failures for compiler-rt sources. Am I missing something basics here? ==================== cmake command used:

I'm seeing this too. CC'ing the author ubsan stuff. Richard, I know you were OK with only supporting Clang-bootstraps, but I don't think that's terribly viable here. We should be able to build ubsan's runtime with standards conforming code unless there is some fairly extreme reason not to... On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Mahesha HS <mahesha.llvm at gmail.com> wrote:

I use latest cmake+ninja which are built from latest sources. ================================= > cmake --version cmake version 2.8.9.20121011-g2876 ================================= -- mahesha On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Mahesha HS <mahesha.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > I am first time trying build CLANG+LLVM using cmake+ninja build > system. I updated all

On Oct 25, 2011, at 6:09 AM, Marcello Maggioni wrote: > Hi, I'm trying to compile the latest clang/llvm SVN versions and I get > this error on multiple systems : Linking, not compiling, but still. I am getting a similar error when building this morning. > Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: > "clang::Sema::checkPseudoObjectRValue(clang::Expr*)", referenced

On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > I'm seeing this too. CC'ing the author ubsan stuff. > > Richard, I know you were OK with only supporting Clang-bootstraps, but I > don't think that's terribly viable here. Just out of curiosity - why isn't that viable? I'd sort of hope to treat optional sanitizer runtimes

I am building a package that makes a simple visualization. A part of the code is in C++, and utilizes the functions srand() and rand() for purposes not related to statistics (introducing random noise in the visualization). The package compiles without problems on my workstation(s), but when I submitted it to the winbuilder service, I got the following weird message: * checking compiled code ...